The Christian Agenda Continues

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]
Run it in your calculator.

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?[/quote]

No, it’s exact.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?[/quote]

No, it’s exact.[/quote]

No, 22/7 is 3.142857143… pi is 3.14159265359…

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?[/quote]

No, it’s exact.[/quote]

No, 22/7 is 3.142857143… pi is 3.14159265359…[/quote]

Damn it! My edits didn’t take. I was wrong. I admit it. Stupid math teachers…

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?[/quote]

No, it’s exact.[/quote]

No, 22/7 is 3.142857143… pi is 3.14159265359…[/quote]

Damn it! My edits didn’t take. I was wrong. I admit it. Stupid math teachers…
[/quote]

My hat is off to a PWI poster that can admit they are wrong :slight_smile:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?[/quote]

No, it’s exact.[/quote]

No, 22/7 is 3.142857143… pi is 3.14159265359…[/quote]

Damn it! My edits didn’t take. I was wrong. I admit it. Stupid math teachers…
[/quote]

My hat is off to a PWI poster that can admit they are wrong :)[/quote]

X2

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?[/quote]

No, it’s exact.[/quote]

No, 22/7 is 3.142857143… pi is 3.14159265359…[/quote]

Damn it! My edits didn’t take. I was wrong. I admit it. Stupid math teachers…
[/quote]

My hat is off to a PWI poster that can admit they are wrong :)[/quote]

X2
[/quote]

Thanks, I was kinda screwed when I actually looked at it. So there was nothing else to do. Can’t argue with hard facts.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?[/quote]

No, it’s exact.[/quote]

No, 22/7 is 3.142857143… pi is 3.14159265359…[/quote]

Damn it! My edits didn’t take. I was wrong. I admit it. Stupid math teachers…
[/quote]

22/7 is an approximation, albeit not very accurate.

Try 355/133 for an better approximation.

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
People over think pi though. The problem with pi isn’t pi itself, it’s the base 10 math system we apply to it. Ouside of that, it’s quite finite. It’s exactly 22/7.[/quote]

No it’s not.[/quote]

Yes it is.[/quote]

Please, show me how pi is 22/7.[/quote]

It is if you round to 3.142 after that they are different. But whose counting?
[/quote]

Rounding… so not exactly 22/7?[/quote]

No, it’s exact.[/quote]

No, 22/7 is 3.142857143… pi is 3.14159265359…[/quote]

Damn it! My edits didn’t take. I was wrong. I admit it. Stupid math teachers…
[/quote]

My hat is off to a PWI poster that can admit they are wrong :)[/quote]

X2
[/quote]

x3

[quote]pat wrote:

Can’t argue with hard facts.
[/quote]

Unless they’re unknowable. :wink:

[quote]pat wrote:
Can’t argue with hard facts.
[/quote]

Unless you are Zep.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
Can’t argue with hard facts.
[/quote]

Unless you are Zep.
[/quote]

or Beans

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
Can’t argue with hard facts.
[/quote]

Unless you are Zep.
[/quote]

or Beans
[/quote]

Dude, straight up, fuck you.

I try and remain civil but you are a douchebag here, so go blow it out your ass.

I didn’t even address you or anyone in this thread in any sort of way. But you bring me up because why?

Simpleton

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
Can’t argue with hard facts.
[/quote]

Unless you are Zep.
[/quote]

or Beans
[/quote]

Dude, straight up, fuck you.

I try and remain civil but you are a douchebag here, so go blow it out your ass.

I didn’t even address you or anyone in this thread in any sort of way. But you bring me up because why?

Simpleton [/quote]

No you can’t fuck me , Fuck Pussy you and he make a great couple :slight_smile:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
Can’t argue with hard facts.
[/quote]

Unless you are Zep.
[/quote]

or Beans
[/quote]

Dude, straight up, fuck you.

I try and remain civil but you are a douchebag here, so go blow it out your ass.

I didn’t even address you or anyone in this thread in any sort of way. But you bring me up because why?

Simpleton [/quote]

No you can’t fuck me , Fuck Pussy you and he make a great couple :slight_smile:
[/quote]

Pitt,

Beans is out of your league when it comes to logic and hard facts.

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
Can’t argue with hard facts.
[/quote]

Unless you are Zep.
[/quote]

or Beans
[/quote]

Dude, straight up, fuck you.

I try and remain civil but you are a douchebag here, so go blow it out your ass.

I didn’t even address you or anyone in this thread in any sort of way. But you bring me up because why?

Simpleton [/quote]

No you can’t fuck me , Fuck Pussy you and he make a great couple :slight_smile:
[/quote]

Pitt,

Beans is out of your league when it comes to logic and hard facts. [/quote]

beans is full of shit :slight_smile:

You know , I have talked to him , he dodged the question by answering another question. I think he is disingenuous and thrives on being an accountant .

I understand that probably Rush Limpdick or Bill Orieley said Progressive means Communism , but that is not what the dictionary says . I want some back up . Not this I am an Accountant bull shit . Let’s deal facts

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I understand that probably Rush Limpdick or Bill Orieley said Progressive means Communism , but that is not what the dictionary says . I want some back up . Not this I am an Accountant bull shit . Let’s deal facts [/quote]

Not to speak on Bean’s, or Rush’s, or O’Reilly’s behalf but, does Marx count as an authority on Communism? I mean, it’s in The Manifesto, Communism is the (intended or desired) result of progress(ivism).

I’ll be honest, I’m not sure what the dictionary says, I’d have to check as to whether Marx references the dictionary or the dictionary references Marx.

Tribal life(Primitive Communism)->Slavery->Feudalism->Capitalism->Socialism->Communism it was clearly portrayed as a social progression, I’m curious as to how you missed it?

EDIT: They were even iteratively numbered, First Stage, Second Stage, Third Stage… are you sure you and he/they are talking about the same Communism?