Don’t forget the “subjective measurement” part of my post.
I don’t think much money has been needed to make transgenderism the greatest issue of our time heavy sarcasm intended.
I mean, one apparently doesn’t even need double digit millions to buy influence in the White House; $25 billion is a lot of double digit millions.
(feeling no guilt whatsoever at derailing an Andrew Tate thread, sorry)
“There are no angels in war”
If you were to answer truthfully the following questions:
Are cluster bombs illegal in the US
Are they illegal in Ukraine
Are they illegal in Russia
Has Russia been using said cluster bombs for the last 500 days in Ukraine and 30 years ago in Chechnya
You wouldn’t need a Russel Brand video to tell you that a country is using a legal type of munition according to their laws, supplied by a country where said munition is, you won’t believe this, legal, to fight against armed forces of a country where said munition is, surprise suprise, also legal and which has been using it very extensively literally from the first day of the war, mostly against civilian targets.
So this is dumb leftist bullshit at best, intentional maliciousness at worst. To me Brand videos are equivalent to “menstruating women” crap.
I’m still unclear what this super profound statement is supposed to convey. Not fighting back like the Menonites is the preferred option?
-He has, numerous times, stated he wants everyone to be vegetarian/vegan.
-He also owns the most farmland in the US as a single individual. From my understanding, he has been purchasing animal pastures - not soybean land for this. Forcing his vision via buyout/meat scarcity.
-He also has a very strong interest in atmospheric darkening via chemical spraying to stop global warming.
It’s not quite the same, but he’s not far off.
I’m still unclear what this super profound statement is supposed to convey. Not fighting back like the Menonites is the preferred option?
I believe many Americans look at the premise of war simply as good guys versus bad guys, never thinking that in some cases simply two sides couldn’t get along with or mistreated each other, and no amount or arbitration worked.
Tate is not original in pointing that out, but I don’t think it’s a senseless statement.
dumb leftist bullshit
Wait, I thought it was right wing frat boy dumb fucks like Tucker Carlson that said this stuff.
“menstruating women” crap.
Not very woke of you, is it?
I believe many Americans look at the premise of war simply as good guys versus bad guys, never thinking that in some cases simply two sides couldn’t get along with or mistreated each other, and no amount or arbitration worked.
I understand the helping Ukraine defend itself against an army seeking to overrun the country.
It’s the “offensive” part of the equation that I’m having trouble dealing with.
unclear what this super profound statement is supposed to convey
They’re using cluster bombs, they’re war criminals…
…our offensive needs a boost, it’s time for us to use cluster bombs; they did it first, so it’s no longer a war crime.
What part of that do you not understand?
Kamil Galeev is an independent researcher and a journalist residing in Moscow. His main focus of interest is the identity politics in post-Soviet Russia, the ethnification of Russian nationalism and the crackdown on the ethnic republics.
[
Kamil Galeev | Wilson Center
[image]
Wilson Center
https://www.wilsoncenter.org › person › kamil-galeev
](Kamil Galeev | Wilson Center)
Nationality: Russian
Education: Peking University, University of St Andrews
You’re citing this guy, an “independent” in Russia (oxymoron much???), educated at Peking University, from a site that allows people like this to have an equal voice, due to the fact that said site is now owned by a guy you obsessively despise for some weird reason.
Dude, you need a time out.
They’re using cluster bombs, they’re war criminals…
…our offensive needs a boost, it’s time for us to use cluster bombs; they did it first, so it’s no longer a war crime.
IDK man, the whole idea of “rules of war” seem pretty dumb.
If you’re in a street fight and he pulls out a knife after you two promised it would only be hand combat, would you pull out your knife?
I’m not informed enough on the ukraine/russian war to comment, outside of that I don’t think we needed to give ukraine some 50 billion dollars to fight it.
If you’re in a street fight and he pulls out a knife after you two promised it would only be hand combat, would you pull out your knife?
I sure would, but I’m not going to be the high and mighty guy beforehand either.
To boost my street cred here, because apparently everybody is super bad: back in the day, some street guy wanted to give me a beat down because I was looking at him wrong blah blah, claimed to have a knife blah blah…I didn’t say a word; after trying to walk away, I turned to face the guy, and was 100% focused on my plan of action; the guy turned tail and pretty much ran away w/o me lifting a finger. No, I didn’t chase him to start an offensive.
So, no, I’m not a “menstruating woman” -I know how the world works. And by this point, this war is stupid, and escalation of said war is beyond asinine.
You’re citing this guy, an “independent” in Russia (oxymoron much???), educated at Peking University, from a site that allows people like this to have an equal voice,
Sigh. BTW Galeev fled a while back DC and I chose the screenshot to save some time - he perfectly summed up something I was unable to articulate coherently myself. BTW, I don’t blindly follow people, I follow insights. Like I said, hat dude has a knack for articulating some Russia- and Central Asian central stuff that is partially confirmed by my written experiences.
due to the fact that said site is now owned by a guy you obsessively despise for some weird reason.
I’m sorry, but you’re getting tiresome. What, do you think the guy was banned before the free speech savior bought Twitter?
I didn’t connect the Musk and Tate. There’s a shitload of grifters (see below); crazies and whatnot apparently hero worshipping a pretty weird pantheon.
I know how the world works. And by this point, this war is stupid, and escalation of said war is beyond asinine.
Well, these two sentences are mutually exclusive.
you’re getting tiresome
Because I’m not an idiot you can poke at to have fun with?
Tiresome, yep, that’s pretty apt.
I follow insights
As long as they’re 140 characters or less, on your favorite site, owned by your favorite billionaire.
I didn’t connect the Musk and Tate.
Yes, for me, you did.
these two sentences are mutually exclusive.
Please explain, I’m no polyglot.
a pretty weird pantheon
You know, I think I’m getting triggered (cool kids use this word) by your posts because in these instances, your barbs sound exactly like the crap I occasionally cannot help but be exposed to, from crazy woke leftists in the media.
But when I put forth a leftist, you’re horrified. Damn, I’m going to lounge in my chair, puff on my cigar, and contemplate…
(just pretend I’m castoli of jcp, then I won’t be tiresome)
I remember your posts when the war first started, you 100% believed it would be over in a day or less with your references to dead men walking etc.
What makes you think your “insight” now is better than any one else’s, when there are so many more variables at play? Besides the all encompassing twitter posts you so love to cite.
“There are no angels in war”
No devils either.
No devils either
Putin lover. J’ACCUSE!!!

