Did I say they can’t?!!!
I accepted your answer!
1 Like
Let’s look back at the conversation
I provided an answer, using analogies of bruising and crying.
You made a counterargument
And expressed that polygraphs were inadmissable in court
As a result. I decided to use more extreme analogies of brutality in certain rape cases. I also made a counterarguement re the claim that polygraphs are inadmissable.
This was not to ARGUE… but to provide examples of how rape could be proven without video or audio, as we were going by this thought (not claim).
In no sentence did I exclaim that you were “certain” about your claim.
To which you replied
“I thought it was obvious”
But it doesn’t matter what is obvious or not if we are merely examining a belief/hunch.
Look through ALL of my answers to you. I never said your thought was a claim of certainty… me “continuing to post as if you were certain” is your interpretation. I did nothing of the sort
No I was not! I had to backpedal to show I wasn’t talking about cases that don’t involve what you mentioned, which would likely actually prove that it was beyond a doubt!
I took this and accepted it! I didn’t say you were arguing!
Yeah! That’s what happens in conversations, expansions of a topic! Which I’m fine with!
?
If I was pivoting my messages to adhere to a dynamic where I was posting as if you were arguing. By default i’d have to be engaging in an arguement with you.
Hence my explanation that it was not my intent to argue.
Yeet
Betting websites could make some money from this whole ordeal
- bet on whether he is found guilty
- bet on duration of sentence if found guilty
- bet on how long the case goes on for
Eh, I thought I could have casual, eye-opening conversation about Andrew Tate and whatever else relates to his case, not one in which I have to be examined with utmost scrutiny for every word I take for granted in casual talk, whether I’m flawed or not in doing so. I’m not ever going to speak on here as if I’m in front of an academic board defending a Phd thesis or testifying in court.
Have a good day.
2 Likes
At least you’re being objective here
1 Like
What do you think about Tate?
As a role model for young men, as an individual etc.
What do you think about the whole hustlers university thing?
I think he’s right about a lot of things he says, but says them in ways intended to cause hurt. I do not know who he is nor have I interacted with him, so it’s hard for me to judge anything else about this man… he’s lived an unrecognizably different life than I.
Yes and no. Young men are being raised by single women and never learn how to be a man - which is why you can see the over-feminization of the last couple generations of ‘men’. Tate is very clearly masculine and makes some much needed points about what it is to be a man. Does that make him right about everything? No.
I think him running a webcam service with women in an almost pimp-style fashion is strange, but I’ve never done webcam stuff, nor engaged with any of the sort. I can be judgemental of this, but frankly I don’t feel qualified. If these women are indentured servants of some sort, or it is a REAL pimp-prostitute type situation which ends with the abuse of the women - I find this ugly (but I don’t know if that’s what this is).
No clue. It’s a good way to make money while making money, and I tend to not feel bad for the buyer’s remorse of mentally capable individuals. Let’s not forget that actual companies exist on this business model (Amway, Mary Kay, Primerica, Herbalife, Etc.) - but we don’t care about these… why? 
1 Like
Is this really something new?
Is he though? He just seems like an egocentric asshole.
What has he said exactly?
New? no. Increasing? Yes.
Would you like me to summarize his thousands of hours of content into a neat little package, or are you playing dumb? I think the latter, because I’m not doing the former.
1 Like
Just asking for a little evidence to back up your claim. Shouldn’t be that hard since there are thousands to choose from.
From the article you posted:
“Solo mothers – those who are raising at least one child with no spouse or partner in the home – no longer dominate the ranks of unmarried parents as they once did.”
While unmarried parents have increased, solo mothers have decreased due to cohabitating parents.
He looks gay to me. Feminine facial features, no chin. Like a gay man performing a parody of what a straight male behaves.
I think he’s a women beating (that’s not debatable, because he apparently beat up a woman with a belt buckle while being a contestant on UK’s Big Brother) asshole because of the whole closeted self-loathing thing.
5 Likes
Are you really arguing that the number of children being raised by a single mother is equal or less prevalent now that it has historically been? Fuck outta here with that.
His rhetoric is that of responsibility (something this world is woefully under-saturated with). I’m not doing more than a 5 minute youtube search to argue with your contrarian bullshit.
I don’t get why yall are coming out of the woodworks acting as if I’m some andrew tate defender.
2 Likes
1 Like
I think that is what the article you posted claims. But I didn’t read all of it to be honest.
2 min would suffice.
To me, he looks like someone with a lot of insecurities. I haven’t seen his content, or know much about him. Just seen pictures mostly.
I am not against someone trying to be fashionable. But it looks to me that his choices in fashion / grooming are to basically all an effort to look masculine, and wealthy. It is weird to me that grown men wear skin tight shirts. Like if you actually are muscular you are going to look built with a looser shit. IDK, I’d assume women see through that type of pea-cocking?
His grooming looks like it requires too much effort for it to be manly IMO. The 5 o’clock shadow beard at all times must require a daily trim? IDK what women think about that type of stuff TBH?
The wealth signalling stuff seems odd to me. Like I see that stuff and usually assume it is just a person that isn’t very good with money (because they are willing to spend thousands of dollars on sunglasses and a watch). I think I am a bit odd in this regard. Maybe wealth signalling does work on most people? It just seems like a ton of work / money to impress women. I guess I am more the type to down play material success. I don’t think much good comes from trying to impress others with possessions.
4 Likes