Thank God, Finally

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Yes, thank goodness we are in the process of closing Gitmo - all we have to do now is figure out how criminal procedure works in the hills of Afghanistan when irregulars are shooting at our soldiers.

Do soldiers have to “knock and announce” before entering a cave?

Do they have to read Miranda rights to irregulars they swarm?

What kind of evidence is used at their non-Gitmo trial? to sustain habeas corpus challenges?

What do we do with the current inmates?

After the sentimentalism of “closing Gitmo” subsides, we face hard choices, and our options might be worse than keeping Gitmo open. Just don’t tell the Hope and Change crowd - who get sleepy and start rubbing their eyes when the hard questions come out.[/quote]

They’re valid questions that need to be answered.

However it ends up, its still better than having a prison in Cuba where you get whisked away to when you’re captured, never to have a trial. That’s simply not the right thing to do to someone. Just because they aren’t American doesn’t mean they’re not human. I think some of you people forget that… especially the “Kill’em All” crowd that wasn’t sleepy unfortunately, and got us into all of this shit.

[quote]pat wrote:

I can’t fucking wait 'til he jacks my taxes out the fucking ass too to pay for all those abortions…[/quote]

You’re an idiot.

[quote]snipeout wrote:
lixy wrote:
Standard Donkey wrote:
thank God…

God knows the only kind of good baby is a dead one

annnnnnd… I LOVE paying for other people’s shit

I don’t hear you complain about the BILLIONS of dollars worth of weaponry that go to Israel, Egypt or any such oppressive state.

Thats because they PAY for the weapons they buy. This just in, local extremist takes a shot at Israel and zionism in a thread about Gitmo, stem cells and US backed foreign abortions.

Don’t care about Gitmo as long as they are detained somewhere, I have seen enough articles on breitbart about released terrorists from gitmo jumping right back on the Qaeda bandwagon.

Stem cells are something that need to be researched and funded federally as long as we aren’t harvesting live embryo’s from mothers, which last time I checked we weren’t.

Foreign abortions paid for by the US? I am totally not for abortion, but it’s legal here. If we are already funding these people does it matter where the money goes as long as it isn’t some warlords pocket?

All in all not much news to me, maybe the stem cell funding is a positive, but who cares about Gitmo and other countries abortions. I hope the one ting this guy can do is pull back from all foreign obligations and make us stronger DOMESTICLY. Finish out what needs to be finished then strengthen from the inside out.[/quote]

Very well stated!

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

They’re valid questions that need to be answered. [/quote]

Correct, and to your problem…

…the kinds of “answers” to the valid questions ultimately require the kinds of trade-offs you categorically outlaw as “inhumane”.

You want the detainees to have a trial once captured - fine. So you can’t have one until you resolve the questions I presented above. So, what to do until you resolve those problems? Let them run free? Or hold them?

Guess what - we are back to square one with a Gitmo situation.

Not liking Gitmo isn’t a legitimate wartime policy. The Left hasn’t offered an alternative, nor do any of the Hopenchangers even have an idea of how to remedy this - which is why, of course, President Obama merely issued an executive order “preparing” Gitmo to be closed within a year.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Oh, as far as Gitmo goes, I bet he just shuffles detainees off (after an initial mass release) to a nice big prison in Afghanistan.[/quote]

This is true. As a matter of priciple, the closing of Guantanomo is (arguably) a good thing. But as a matter of practice, people will just be tortured and receive no due process completely under the radar in foreign countries.

Thanks god on the stem cells. That was always the most ludicrous and moronic policy. The embryos these cells are harvested from are created but not used in in vitro fertility treatments. They were to be destroyed or stored for long periods of time, way past viable storage use. There is absolutely no way for these embryos to ever become living humans. The only life-supporting use is for stem-cell research. People against embryonic stem cell research are against life.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
This blood isn’t on my hands. I didn’t vote for the man.[/quote]

But the blood that is on your hands for voting for Bush?

He is responsible for killing real, live, innocent women and children.

EDIT
So is Obama now:

Thieves! All of you.

[quote]1000rippedbuff wrote:
The research hasn’t been done on stem cells due to it being illegal. The uses are not entirely known yet.[/quote]

Stem cells have been found to be quite useful. It’s embryonic stem cells that are the problem. And they have been studied just in limited supply. They have not found any use for them yet, just potential. They have found use in other types of stem cells.
I have nothing against studying them provided the means of getting them are by natural means. I am against farming human embryos just to get the stem cells. That’s just kinda sick.

[quote]
What do we do with the current inmates?[/quote]

Let them go on the east coast, preferably near DC. There’s plenty of mosques in northern Virginiastan where they can feel right at home.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
pat wrote:

I can’t fucking wait 'til he jacks my taxes out the fucking ass too to pay for all those abortions…

You’re an idiot.[/quote]

He wants to raise my taxes and use that money to pay for abortions. Shit, it was a campaign promise.
If that’s cool with you then you’re the idiot.

I didn’t vote for the socialistic cocksucker so don’t blame me.

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:

What do we do with the current inmates?

Let them go on the east coast, preferably near DC. There’s plenty of mosques in northern Virginiastan where they can feel right at home. [/quote]

I say we send them to Europe with their friends.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Yes, thank goodness we are in the process of closing Gitmo - all we have to do now is figure out how criminal procedure works in the hills of Afghanistan when irregulars are shooting at our soldiers.

Do soldiers have to “knock and announce” before entering a cave?

Do they have to read Miranda rights to irregulars they swarm?

What kind of evidence is used at their non-Gitmo trial? to sustain habeas corpus challenges?

What do we do with the current inmates?

After the sentimentalism of “closing Gitmo” subsides, we face hard choices, and our options might be worse than keeping Gitmo open. Just don’t tell the Hope and Change crowd - who get sleepy and start rubbing their eyes when the hard questions come out.[/quote]

Well said.

The Gitmo issue was always nonsense and “sentimentalism” as Thunder put it. I believe it stems from an absolute and total lack of understanding of the nature of the threat. In my experience, the urgency to close Gitmo is part of a larger set of beliefs about the radical Islamic terrorist that are completely false. Specifically, I am referring to perceptions like the jihadist’s grievances stem from Western imperialism and there exists some pathway of diplomacy that will lead to us sitting down with them at a table and working all of this out. That is a Disneyland view of the problem, at least when we are talking about the type of people that Gitmo houses.

Nobody is quite sure what to do with these people. There is in fact some guidance about the handling of these maniacs in US history(look up the Nazi spies captured in the US during WW2).

Seriously study the enemy and spend some time with someone who has fought against them(I have). I think you may reach the same conclusions that I have. A military prison on a far away island, surrounded by Marines, mines and sharks is exactly where they belong. If you are using empathy to put yourself in the terrorists shoes, as I suspect many left-leaning folks do, stop now. You are very, very different than they are. Don’t take my word for it. Read “Terror at Beslan”, complete with the rape and random shooting of 6 year olds, and your perceptions will be changed forever.

Our own sentimental weakness will be our undoing.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
pat wrote:

I can’t fucking wait 'til he jacks my taxes out the fucking ass too to pay for all those abortions…

You’re an idiot.[/quote]

Irish, you fail to understand that, whether or not abortion is legal or not legal, some (myself included), do not want public money funding these endeavors. Is this so hard to understand?

IMHO, this is an immoral application of public funds.

[quote]JD430 wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
Yes, thank goodness we are in the process of closing Gitmo - all we have to do now is figure out how criminal procedure works in the hills of Afghanistan when irregulars are shooting at our soldiers.

Do soldiers have to “knock and announce” before entering a cave?

Do they have to read Miranda rights to irregulars they swarm?

What kind of evidence is used at their non-Gitmo trial? to sustain habeas corpus challenges?

What do we do with the current inmates?

After the sentimentalism of “closing Gitmo” subsides, we face hard choices, and our options might be worse than keeping Gitmo open. Just don’t tell the Hope and Change crowd - who get sleepy and start rubbing their eyes when the hard questions come out.

Well said.

The Gitmo issue was always nonsense and “sentimentalism” as Thunder put it. I believe it stems from an absolute and total lack of understanding of the nature of the threat. In my experience, the urgency to close Gitmo is part of a larger set of beliefs about the radical Islamic terrorist that are completely false. Specifically, I am referring to perceptions like the jihadist’s grievances stem from Western imperialism and there exists some pathway of diplomacy that will lead to us sitting down with them at a table and working all of this out. That is a Disneyland view of the problem, at least when we are talking about the type of people that Gitmo houses.

Nobody is quite sure what to do with these people. There is in fact some guidance about the handling of these maniacs in US history(look up the Nazi spies captured in the US during WW2).

Seriously study the enemy and spend some time with someone who has fought against them(I have). I think you may reach the same conclusions that I have. A military prison on a far away island, surrounded by Marines, mines and sharks is exactly where they belong. If you are using empathy to put yourself in the terrorists shoes, as I suspect many left-leaning folks do, stop now. You are very, very different than they are. Don’t take my word for it. Read “Terror at Beslan”, complete with the rape and random shooting of 6 year olds, and your perceptions will be changed forever.

Our own sentimental weakness will be our undoing.

[/quote]

Well said, both of you!

I will plug the book again: Lee Harris, The Suicide of Reason.

[quote]JD430 wrote:
Our own sentimental weakness will be our undoing.
[/quote]

I agree, and often wonder if the US is losing it’s stomach for battle.

[quote]bigflamer wrote:
FightinIrish26 wrote:
pat wrote:

I can’t fucking wait 'til he jacks my taxes out the fucking ass too to pay for all those abortions…

You’re an idiot.

Irish, you fail to understand that, whether or not abortion is legal or not legal, some (myself included), do not want public money funding these endeavors. Is this so hard to understand?

IMHO, this is an immoral application of public funds.[/quote]

I disagree, but that’s a fair point.

[quote]JD430 wrote:
thunderbolt23 wrote:
Yes, thank goodness we are in the process of closing Gitmo - all we have to do now is figure out how criminal procedure works in the hills of Afghanistan when irregulars are shooting at our soldiers.

Do soldiers have to “knock and announce” before entering a cave?

Do they have to read Miranda rights to irregulars they swarm?

What kind of evidence is used at their non-Gitmo trial? to sustain habeas corpus challenges?

What do we do with the current inmates?

After the sentimentalism of “closing Gitmo” subsides, we face hard choices, and our options might be worse than keeping Gitmo open. Just don’t tell the Hope and Change crowd - who get sleepy and start rubbing their eyes when the hard questions come out.

Well said.

The Gitmo issue was always nonsense and “sentimentalism” as Thunder put it. I believe it stems from an absolute and total lack of understanding of the nature of the threat. In my experience, the urgency to close Gitmo is part of a larger set of beliefs about the radical Islamic terrorist that are completely false. Specifically, I am referring to perceptions like the jihadist’s grievances stem from Western imperialism and there exists some pathway of diplomacy that will lead to us sitting down with them at a table and working all of this out. That is a Disneyland view of the problem, at least when we are talking about the type of people that Gitmo houses.

Nobody is quite sure what to do with these people. There is in fact some guidance about the handling of these maniacs in US history(look up the Nazi spies captured in the US during WW2).

Seriously study the enemy and spend some time with someone who has fought against them(I have). I think you may reach the same conclusions that I have. A military prison on a far away island, surrounded by Marines, mines and sharks is exactly where they belong. If you are using empathy to put yourself in the terrorists shoes, as I suspect many left-leaning folks do, stop now. You are very, very different than they are. Don’t take my word for it. Read “Terror at Beslan”, complete with the rape and random shooting of 6 year olds, and your perceptions will be changed forever.

Our own sentimental weakness will be our undoing.
[/quote]

Save your book recommendations. That people do terrible things is not a revelation, nor has it anything to do with what country they come from.

Americans committed various atrocities and slaughters during the Indian Wars including the killing of women and children. Hell, we even massacred are own at Fort Pillow, but no one put Forrest in jail, or any of the generals from the Indian Wars. Hell, they got promoted.

The fact is, this nation is not a nation of secret military prisons. If you’re giving child molesters and mass murderers trials, then apparently the brutality of the crime has nothing to do with whether or not there’s a trial.

I don’t “Put myself in a terrorists shoes”. But if you’re going to execute these people for crimes against humanity, then have a trial and execute them. If you have nothing on them, then let them the fuck go.

This is not a country that should have soldiers kicking down doors in foreign nations and putting black bags over their heads, and certainly not one that imprisons them for years without trials.

That Americans defend this is amazing to me.

Anyone who condones government intervention in any way, shape, or form might as well be both a murderer and a thief.

[quote]snipeout wrote:
Thats because they PAY for the weapons they buy.[/quote]

What are you? Stupid? It’s called AID for a reason.

It’s a handout you moron!