Test and Tren and Several Misc. Questions

I already posted a few days ago my cycle I am starting next week after a 6 month layoff due to medical issues. I have lost size and gained BF and test crashed hard because I was blasting and cruising for several years. Hey I am 43 so I can do that lol. I already have my first bulking cycle planned and I will start cruising after but I am planning out my second cycle. I have done one Test C/Tren A cycle a couple years ago and I was able to handle the sides.

I then did a Test/Ten E/Mast cycle that was awesome so I have some experience with Tren.

My question is there are so many people that dont agree on Test and Tren amounts or which to run more. This board is by far the best but I dont see the older vets on here that I use to talk with. Where are you ALL lol.

My stats 43 6’6 currently 270 at around 12% BF. Way higher than its been because of last 6months. I will eventually run a T3/Clen cycle after I bulk and the cut some BF the good ole fashioned cardio way lol.

Anyway can someone please answer the following and tell me if I have the right info?

  1. Test and Tren compete for same receptors and Tren always wins? True/False?
  2. You should run test/Tren on a 1:1 or 2:1 ratio? I ran it on a 2:1 ratio like Tren E at 600 and test at 300. Should I look to do a 1:1 ratio? or am I dead wrong and run Test higher?
  3. Best addition to this stack? EQ for bulking and Mast for cutting?
  4. Would Test/EQ be just as good a cycle without Tren?
  5. Would a low dose T3 be beneficial for any cycle? I was told by someone on a different board that it would be beneficial for most cycles but I dont see it a whole lot so I doubt that advice.

I get with these compounds its about Diet as far as cutting/Bulk. I am just in planning phase and doing my research so I can obtain the products I decide on.

Was the medical issue related to heart troubles, cholesterol or a stroke, if so, stay off the sauce
Answers

  1. I’m not sure, the steroid receptors competing thing is a myth, there is no medical literature to support the idea
  2. Test to tren ratio is personal preference, some people like tren higher than test, some like test higher and some like a 50/50 split, It does seem low test high tren is the most popular though
  3. Sure
  4. Test/EQ I would think carries far less health risks than tren, it’ll have to be run longer due to the ester. Test/EQ is also a versatile solid cycle that could be used as a cut or a bulk
  5. Personal preference, I personally wouldn’t mess around with my thyroid unless I was a competitive bodybuilder.

Also you have some seriously impressive stats

1 Like

So the T3 question…
How much is a low dose? Assume your body “makes” ~25mcg a day, your dose would have to be enough above that level for you to have noticeable positive benefits. So a low dose would be 50mcgs? I agree with Unreal, messing with the thyroid is not on my radar and thus I can’t give you any empirical evidence of what’s good or bad. But just knowing that your body has/uses a certain amount each day naturally, you’ll need to add an exogenous amount that is sufficient to make a material difference. Does that make sense?

Makes sense to me Iron. The little I have read about it and those that add it in do exactly that, they just do 25mcg a day so I get what you and saying and I havent read enough on it to get me to do it but enough to get me curious and research a little more.

Thanks Unreal for the input as well. I’ve read the same thing on peoples preference on test and tren. I have enough tren and I actually am starting to consider adding tren to my first cycle with test/EQ. I have just had some good results with it.