Teenager Assaulted at Gym for "Deadlifting Too Loud"

I applaud your effort here guys. I don’t think it will pay off.

9 Likes

I don’t agree with this, though. If there is no choice, that means you don’t have control of your actions during the act. Then you cannot be a terrible person since you would not be responsible for the act.

Give the first 2 minutes of this a watch - or all of it, as it’s fascinating - and decide for yourself if this girl has any choice about the way she feels.

2 Likes

Yeah fair enough, I worded that very poorly. Having that sort of mindset being brought on by abuse and a failure to get help/or for others to realize that you need help isnt a choice, but acting on that mindset to hurt others is definitely a choice.

1 Like

A gym I used to deadlift at with Tee Cummins had a Fantastic Sams Hair Salon connected to it. The deadlifting was rattling pictures off their walls. The owner used to come over pissed off all the time. It only made us deadlift harder, heavier, and louder. Good times.

I also deadlifted at a more commercial gym and had the head trainer there tell me I was being too loud and scaring his clients. There is no real good way to set down over 600 lbs for sets to failure easily and quietly. He caught me on a bad day and got a tirade of choice words from me as I was trying to catch my breath. He was like 5’6 155 lbs soaking wet so…

1 Like

This discussion has taken a strange turn and doesn’t really belong in the PL section, but regardless of that the above logic doesn’t make a lot of sense. No, it isn’t morally acceptable to abuse others after yourself being abused but it does happen that way. Aside from the pedophile thing, it is common knowledge that kids who are beaten by their parents are much more likely to go on to beat their own kids, and boys who witness their father beating their mother are more likely to go on to beat women. A lot of people take out their frustrations on others, this is just another example.

@dt79 @theonecamko attraction to kids can’t be proven in the court of law. Unless a crime has been committed, there’s nothing that can be done. I agree with this fully.

However, the ones attracted to kids are likely to offend and are a risk to society. It’s weak and spineless as hell to condone and victimize that shit as if it can’t be helped. If somebody is attracted to kids or wants to defend people attracted to kids, they need to keep it to themselves. The punishment for that should be social stigma and there’s nothing ignorant about that

How can you prove this? Ignorant statement.

Thats the thing, its like being gay(attracted to the same sex), its not a choice. You cant just flip a switch and suddenly not be gay anymore. Same goes for being attracted to children. As long as pedophiles do not act on there attraction.

They have the same rights as everyone else, there is no reason they should be punished for something beyond their control. They should only be punished if they choose to go after kids/have child porn, cause that is within their control. Again, you are making a very ignorant statement.

Edit: A pedophile isnt a child molester, and a child molester isnt always a pedophile.

Cut the crap.

He was responding to this post by duke because duke obviously thought the word “pedophile” means “someone who has commited the act of fucking a child”.

He explained that there are people who are attracted to kids, either through biology or otherwise, but do not commit the act.

These people are pedophiles.

Which means pedophiles should not be given the “death penalty” along with “rapists, sex traffickers and serial killers.” unless they have committed the act.

For this, you called a 17 year old kid a pedophile.

Prove it.

No one has victimized them. You are inferring what you want to infer. If they were being victimized, there would be a recommendation that prior abuse should be a mitigating factor when being tried for the ACT.

It depends on what they are being defended from. What about the death sentance for doing nothing?

1 Like

@dt79 @theonecamko Prove it? Well every child molester has been attracted to children. Maybe if they weren’t attracted to children they wouldn’t have molested them? But way to tell the world you sympathize with potential sex offenders.

Here’s a guy who raped and killed both a woman and her infant. Turns out he had a history of watching child porn before he actually struck:

A simple google search will yield tons of results of men who raped and/or murdered children, and happened to have a history of viewing child porn. These are the guys you’re defending.

A 17 year old kid can still be a pedophile. You mean to tell me he’s not if he’s preying on elementary school kids?

Im out. I dont think anything more can be said.

Every male rapist has been attracted to women. What should we do?

I believe people are innocent until proven guilty. My beliefs do not change just because the subject does.

Nope.

YOU could be a pedophile. How do I know you’re not just virtue signalling to hide this?

I’m not the one saying that it’s okay to have feelings of attraction.

There was more virtue signaling in the obscure hunger games scenario.

Being attracted to women isn’t going to result in rape 100% of the time of acted upon, same with homosexuality and support of recreational drugs. However, being attracted to children will 100% lead to child molestation if acted upon.

Ok, below is a pretty basic, easy to understand article to get some insight into the psychology behind this. It would literally take a huge amount of time and commitment to find, cite and teach someone who has limited knowledge on mental illnesses. It’s so vaste and is precisely why psychiatrists, psychologists, researchers etc go to school and learn about it for a long time…and are still learning.

I feel like this topic, here in this context, is like trying to show a person the different aspects of the night sky while they are looking through a plastic kaleidoscope…it’s just not going to work.
We are going around in circles and discussing various different mental health problems at the same time ie: child molesters, ptsd, murderers etc.

But here’s one more go…

“Not all paedophiles are child sex offenders, and conversely not all child sex offenders are paedophiles. Some people who sexually abuse children are not preferentially attracted to children at all. The abuse is a matter of opportunity: the child is a sexual surrogate for an unavailable adult or the abuse represents a need to dominate and control another human being.”

2 Likes

Nor did anyone else. Stop making things up.

What was said was “It’s not okay to punish people who have not committed an illegal act”.

And this was in reference to dukes original post about “pedophiles should get the DEATH SENTENCE”.

And the reply was DEFINING a pedophile as “someone who has an attraction to kids”, not just “someone who has fucked a kid”.

So you only have mild pedophilic tendencies while the other guy has more?

Come on, you can’t just accuse someone of being a pedophile without any evidence if you don’t like what they have written.

The parents of the child will have to do their duties. There are signs, behavior patterns that indicate something is not right with a person. There will be people talking about that person. They need be step up the vigilance, take precautions and not leave the child alone with him/her.

This is all you can do without violating the rights of another person who has not committed any crime.

N = 1.

I’ve known a kid since he was born. After going to college, moving around, etc. the family recently came back into my life. I found out that the kid ended up in juvey at 13 for molestjng his little sister and brother. He’s now 15, but it was discovered that his uncle who lived with them for a few years had molested him when he was 7-9. The kid is sociopathic now, but if this hadn’t happened to him at such a young age, who knows how he would have ended up.

1 Like

How would we ever find out if people like @SOUL_FIGHTER get outraged and call us pedophiles even when we’re not directly discussing the issue?

You’re the one who’s upset that people suggest social stigma against people who declare attention towards children

Being against pedophilia is the social norm. Are you implying that everybody who hates pedophiles is just “virtue signaling”?

And to add, there are plenty of victims who don’t become offenders. This guy just pulled this story out of his ass as a random excuse to justify what he did.

What the fuck is wrong with you? You have misrepresented EVERY SINGLE WORD I HAVE WRITTEN.

1 Like

Then stop making these people out as victims of something they can’t help? I don’t know about you, but I remember a time that people didn’t try to make excuses for this.