Swift Boat Veterans for Truth

Thank you for this thread. You raise extremely important questions.

Do you know why Kerry’s Vietnam record is relevant? John Kerry has made it one of the centerpieces of his campaign. How can you fault us for saying, “Ok, if you think your Vietnam service entitles you to the Presidency, why not examine it in detail?”

I think many of us are uncomfortable with the overwhelming majority of his comrades saying everything from he is “deceiving” to he is “lying.” We are uncomfortable with him filming his own “exploits” while in country. To many of us, this reeks of political opportunism. Most of us wonder how a man who admits to committing atrocities could have the moral authority to punish the people involved in Abu Gharib.

Lumpy, why bring George Bush into this discussion? We are talking about John Kerry. If your candidate was so wonderful, you should not need to try to divert attention away from him. If you believe in him, stick up for his record. Leave Bush out of this.

JeffR

http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesuite.net/unfit_video_wmv.html

Use an IE browser to view this page. It is a very powerful message. I hope to see this on TV soon. Truth.

[quote]biltritewave wrote:
Lumpy…thats from Kerry’s own ‘comrades’. I cant wait for their book to come out. [/quote]

NONE of these guys served on the same boat as John Kerry!

These attacks are coming from the same people who also attacked John McCain’s service record in Viet Nam.

Didn’t McCain just say that this was a bunch of bull shit. Kind of the same thing the Bush people did to him.

McCain Condemns Anti-Kerry Ad
McCain Calls Ad Criticizing Kerry’s Military Service ‘Dishonest and Dishonorable’
The Associated Press
WASHINGTON Aug. 5, 2004

Republican Sen. John McCain, a former prisoner of war in Vietnam, called an ad criticizing John Kerry’s military service “dishonest and dishonorable” and urged the White House on Thursday to condemn it as well.

The White House declined.

“It was the same kind of deal that was pulled on me,” McCain said in an interview with The Associated Press, comparing the anti-Kerry ad to tactics in his bitter Republican primary fight with President Bush.

The 60-second ad features Vietnam veterans who accuse the Democratic presidential nominee of lying about his decorated Vietnam War record and betraying his fellow veterans by later opposing the conflict.

“When the chips were down, you could not count on John Kerry,” one of the veterans, Larry Thurlow, says in the ad. Thurlow didn’t serve on Kerry’s swiftboat, but says he witnessed the events that led to Kerry winning a Bronze Star and the last of his three Purple Hearts. Kerry’s crewmates support the candidate and call him a hero.

The ad, scheduled to air in a few markets in Ohio, West Virginia and Wisconsin, was produced by Stevens, Reed, Curcio and Potham, the same team that produced McCain’s ads in 2000.

“I wish they hadn’t done it,” McCain said of his former advisers. “I don’t know if they knew all the facts.”

Asked if the White House knew about the ad or helped find financing for it, McCain said, “I hope not, but I don’t know. But I think the Bush campaign should specifically condemn the ad.”

McCain, chairman of Bush’s campaign in Arizona, later said the Bush campaign has denied any involvement and added, “I can’t believe the president would pull such a cheap stunt.”

White House spokesman Scott McClellan declined to condemn the ad. He did denounce the proliferation of spending by independent groups, such as the anti-Kerry veterans organization, that are playing on both sides of the political fence.

“The president thought he got rid of this unregulated soft money when he signed the bipartisan campaign finance reform into law,” McClellan said. A chief sponsor of that bill, which Bush initially opposed, was McCain.

In 2000, Bush’s supporters sponsored a rumor campaign against McCain in the South Carolina primary, helping Bush win the primary and the nomination. McCain’s supporters have never forgiven the Bush team.

McCain said that’s all in the past to him, but he’s speaking out against the anti-Kerry ad because “it reopens all the old wounds of the Vietnam War, which I spent the last 35 years trying to heal.”

“I deplore this kind of politics,” McCain said. “I think the ad is dishonest and dishonorable. As it is, none of these individuals served on the boat (Kerry) commanded. Many of his crew have testified to his courage under fire. I think John Kerry served honorably in Vietnam. I think George Bush served honorably in the Texas Air National Guard during the Vietnam War.”

Retired Adm. Roy Hoffmann, head of the Swift Boat group, said they respected McCain’s “right to express his opinion and we hope he extends to us the same respect and courtesy, particularly since we served with John Kerry, we knew him well and Sen. McCain did not.”

McCain himself spent more than five years in a Vietnam prisoner of war camp. A bona fide war hero, McCain, like Kerry, used his war record as the foundation of his presidential campaign.

The Kerry campaign has denounced the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, saying none of the men in the ad served on the boat that Kerry commanded. Three veterans on Kerry’s boat that day Jim Rassmann, who says Kerry saved his life, Gene Thorson and Del Sandusky, the driver on Kerry’s boat, said the group was lying.

They say Kerry was injured, and Rassmann called the group’s account “pure fabrication.”

Hoffmann said none of the 13 veterans in the commercial served on Kerry’s boat but rather were in other swiftboats within 50 yards of Kerry’s. The group claims that there was no gunfire on the day Kerry pulled Rassmann from a muddy river in the Mekong Delta and that Kerry’s arm was not wounded, as he has claimed.

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Politics/ap20040805_1092.html

[quote]Lumpy wrote:

Retired Adm. Roy Hoffmann, head of the Swift Boat group, said they respected McCain’s “right to express his opinion and we hope he extends to us the same respect and courtesy, particularly since we served with John Kerry, we knew him well and Sen. McCain did not.”

[/quote]

I think your article said it best.

All those veterans line up for Bush

"Thursday August 05, 2004–A Rasmussen Reports survey shows that military veterans prefer George W. Bush over John Kerry by a 58% to 35% margin. Those with no military service favor Kerry by ten percentage points, 51% to 41%.

The potential grassroots impact of the war issue is highlighted by the fact that 48% of Americans say they know someone who is currently serving in Iraq or Afghanistan. Among these voters, Bush currently has a ten-point advantage in the poll. Fifty-four percent (54%) of veterans know someone serving in these war zones.

When it comes to perceptions of the situation in Afghanistan and Iraq, it is likely that information from family and friends has a bigger impact than news coverage.

Overall, 47% of voters believe that Bush would make a better Commander-in-Chief than John Kerry. Forty-five percent (45%) take the opposite view and say Kerry would do a better job. This closely reflects the overall voter preference in the race for the White House (on the nights of this survey, Kerry attracted 48% of the total vote to 45% for Bush).

Veterans prefer Bush as Commander-in-Chief by a 60% to 33% margin. Fifty-four percent (54%) of veterans give the President good or excellent ratings for handling the situation in Iraq. Overall, just 43% of voters give the President such positive ratings on Iraq"

Thought you might find this transcript of a CNN interview of a Swiftboat guy and a pro-Kerry Viet Nam vet interesting.

CNN Reports, You Decide:

[If you follow the link, it’s about half way down]

http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0408/05/ip.01.html

WOODRUFF: We’ve been reporting on the debate between Vietnam veterans for and against John Kerry. With me now, two central figures in this debate. Larry Thurlow, he’s with me here in Washington. Like John Kerry, he commanded a swift boat in Vietnam. He appears in that anti-Kerry television ad that we showed you a little earlier.

In Eugene, Oregon, is Jim Rassmann. He served under John Kerry’s command and he credits Kerry with saving his life. Rassmann, you may remember, spoke at last week’s Democratic convention.

Larry Thurlow, I want to – I want to begin with you. You essentially, as I understand it, you, too, won a Bronze Star, like John Kerry did. The incident in which John Kerry pulled Jim Rassmann out of – out of the river…

LARRY THURLOW, APPEARS IN ANTI-KERRY AD: Yes? WOODRUFF: … in Vietnam, Kerry says that this happened under enemy fire, that Rassmann had been knocked in the water, he went back and was the first to get to Rassmann and pulled him out of the water. You essentially said that’s not what happened. What are you saying?

THURLOW: My recollection of that day is still pretty vivid after all these years. And what I remember, Judy, is that the incident involving Mr. Rassmann, five boats had come out of the river after running an operation up in the canal earlier that day. Three boats were going through a fishing weir on the left side of the river that had put in place between the time we entered and when we were leaving.

I’m the third boat in that column left. In the column right, there are two boats. The lead boat is John Kerry’s.

He’s going through a rather small opening on the right bank that (ph) had been left in his boat. The boat leading our column, as it goes through that small opening almost simultaneously, is blasted completely out of the water by a command detonated mine.

WOODRUFF: This is another boat?

THURLOW: This is a 3-boat (ph) – this is on the opposite side of the river of John Kerry’s boat. At this point, John Kerry speeds out of the area, I assume to clear the kill zone. The rest of the boats, however, went to the aid of the 3-boat (ph), which was completely disabled. Two members of that crew are in the water, the rest are badly wounded and basically incapacitated on board that boat.

WOODRUFF: You’re basically saying he fled when there was…

(CROSSTALK)

THURLOW: I am saying he fled the area on the explosion under the 3-boat (ph).

WOODRUFF: All right. Well, before – and let me ask Jim Rassmann about that part of the story before we ask what happened to him.

Jim Rassmann, what – what do you say happened that day in March, 1969?

JIM RASSMANN, KERRY SUPPORTER: Well, first, I was not part of John Kerry’s command. I was a Special Forces officer who happened to be on his boat at that time.

Mr. Thurlow’s recollection of what occurred is not accurate. We had the boat hit the mine to our left. And John immediately had his driver, Del Sandusky (ph), turn to the left and head towards it.

And it was at that time that our gunner on the bow got his gun knocked out and he started screaming for another weapon. I ran another weapon up to me, and we hit something or something hit us. There was an explosion, and I was blown off the boat to the right.

WOODRUFF: And you ended up in the water how?

RASSMANN: I was blown into the water, and I had boats coming up behind me. So, I went to the bottom of the river.

WOODRUFF: Now, as I understand it, Larry Thurlow, you have a different version of how Jim Rassmann was in the water.

THURLOW: Yes, I do. My thought is that since no mine was detected on the other side of the river, no blast was seen, no noise heard, there’s two things that are inconsistent with my memory.

Our boats immediately put automatic weapons fire on to the left bank just in case there was an ambush in conjunction with the mine. It soon became apparent there was no ambush.

The rescue efforts began on the 3-boat (ph). And at this time, the second boat in line, mine being the third boat on the left bank, began to do this.

Now, two members in this boat, keep in mind, are in the river at that time. They’re picked up. The boat that picks them up starts toward Lieutenant Rassmann at this time, that’s the 23-boat (ph). But before they get there, John does return and pick him up. But I distinctly remember we were under no fire from either bank.

WOODRUFF: Jim Rassmann, what about that? You hear Mr. Thurlow saying there was no enemy fire at that point.

RASSMANN: Mr. Thurlow is being disingenuous. I don’t know what his motivation is, but I was receiving fire in the water every time I came up for air. I don’t recall anybody being in the area around us until I came up maybe five or six times for air and Kerry came back to pick me up out of the water.

WOODRUFF: Disingenuous. He says you are being disingenuous in not recalling what happened.

THURLOW: Let me ask Mr. Rassmann this question: I also ended up in the water that day during the rescue efforts on the 3-boat (ph). And my boat, the 51-boat (ph), came up, picked me up, business as usual. I got back on board, went about the business at hand.

I received no fire. But the thing I would like to ask is, we have five boats now, John’s returning, and four boats basically dead in the water, working on the 3-boat (ph). If we were receiving fire off the bank, how come not one single boat received one bullet hole, nobody was hit, no sign of any rounds hitting the water while I was in it?

WOODRUFF: What about that, Jim Rassmann, quickly?

RASSMANN: There were definitely rounds hitting the water around me. If Mr. Thurlow feels that what his story is purported to be was the case, he had ample opportunity 35 years ago to deal with it. He never did, nor did anyone else. John Kerry did not tell this story. I told this story when I put him in for a Silver Star for coming back to rescue me. The Navy saw fit to reduce it to a Bronze Star for valor.

That’s OK with me. But If Mr. Furlow had a problem with that, he should have dealt with it long, long ago. To bring it up now, I think, is very disingenuous. I think that this is partisan motivation on his part and for the part of his whole organization.

WOODRUFF: Mr. Thurlow, why didn’t you bring this up earlier?

THURLOW: For one thing, I did not know that John had been put in for a Bronze Star, a Silver Star or, for that matter, a Purple Heart on that day. I did not see the after-action report, which, in fact, was written by John. And as the years went by, John was not running for the highest office in the free world.

WOODRUFF: What about Mr. Rassmann’s point that he thinks you’re doing this for partisan purposes?

THURLOW: Well, this is not true because, the fact of the matter is, I have not been active in any political party since I got out of the service. In fact, I basically turned my back on politics because of my experience in the service.

WOODRUFF: But this – you feel strongly enough about this to be out?

THURLOW: I certainly do. My point is, is that John Kerry, because of the actions he’s taken, and then the fantastic stories he made up about this, when many people beside myself know this not to be true, negates him being the leader he claims to be. And I would hate to have him be the commander-in-chief over my grandchildren.

WOODRUFF: Jim Rassmann, you want to respond to that?

RASSMANN: I sure do. I have two wonderful kids. They’re very bright, they’re compassionate people. I’m here today not just because John Kerry pulled me out of that water. I’m here today because if those two kids of mine were in the military, I would want John Kerry to be the commander-in-chief, not George Bush.

I think that Mr. Thurlow has a very unusual recollection of the events. I think that it’s important to note that even today John McCain has come out and called this ad that they have produced dishonest and dishonorable. And I think I would have to agree with him.

WOODRUFF: Well, gentlemen, we are going to have to leave it there. Mr. Jim Rassmann, we thank you for joining us from Eugene, Oregon.

Larry Thurlow, we thank you for joining us here in Washington. We know you’re from Kansas. We appreciate it.

And I have a sense we’re going to continue to hear more about this story in the days and the weeks to come. Gentlemen, thank you very much.

THURLOW: You’re welcome.

WOODRUFF: We appreciate it.

Well, both Senator Kerry and President Bush are on the road this afternoon. We’re going to catch up with the campaigns in a minute. We’re also going to talk dollars and cents as we look at what each candidate is promising to do for business.

Thank you BB for helping expose Kerry and his disingenuous, revisionist history of his involvement in the Vietnam War. Many officers were ticket punchers in Vietnam who had no shame in requesting medals for themselves for acts that did not measure up to the requirements. If we look at Kerry’s behavior after the war and his voting record in the Senate, we can deduce what his real purpose was during the Vietnam War; he is no hero, but he is a Socialist, and along with his Socialist, European wife they will ruin this country if elected.

Honestly, I don’t know how politically effective these ads will be – I know that the group running them absolutely despises Kerry, and I know that they are visually, viscerally powerful. However, they might provoke a backlash if Kerry handles them properly. Properly, in this case, would mean intelligently, and would entail calm rebuttal, dismissal, and using them in a Clintonian manner to provoke sympathy among undecided voters who don’t care about Viet Nam (which describes the majority of undecided voters).

However, Kerry is not handling this properly thus far. He’s sicced his lawyers on stations that are thinking of running the ad, which makes him look like the bully who can’t face the contentions.

See this letter, sent by his attorneys to threaten stations who run the ad:

http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesuite.net/unfit_pdf.html

As I said on another thread, it brings to mind Tallyrand’s description of Napolean’s assassination of one of his enemies. To paraphrase: It’s not just wrong, it’s a mistake.

" Florida state Sen. Dexter Lehtinen, a Vietnam veteran and the U.S. Attorney who convicted Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega."

-I hope Lehtinen then prosecutes the man who helped Noriega rise to power, and former head of the CIA, Bush Sr.

Here’s some more on the letter from Kerry’s lawyers above:
[no permalink available – from The Kerry Spot on www.nationalreview.com]

KERRY THREATENS TV STATIONS OVER SWIFT BOAT AD [08/05 05:13 PM]

Human Events reports that the DNC and the Kerry campaign are writing to television stations, stating that the Swift Boat ads is is “false” and “libelous” and that “your station may not responsibly air this advertisement.”

At least one of their points in the letter is an obvious lie: “The advertisement contains statements by men who purport to have served on Senator John Kerry’s SWIFT [sic] boat in Vietnam and one statement by a man pretending to be the doctor who treated Senator Kerry for one of his injuries.”

Horsepucky.

Every vet in the ad says, “I served with John Kerry,” but not one of them claims to have been in his boat. Most of the men are other swiftboat captains. They’ve been open and clear in their statements that they served in other swift boats operating within 50 yards on Kerry’s side, and their statements are their observations on serving alongside him, not under him.

NR’s own Byron York had the scoop on Louis Letson, the doctor, months ago.
http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200405041626.asp
The Kerry letter insists that Letson is a “phony” because he didn’t sign Kerry’s sick call sheet.

The Los Angeles Times looked at the who-signed-the-form controversy back in May:
[note: link provided is from the original post, and it is to a Seattle Times article]

"Meehan questioned Letson's role, saying a J.C. Carreon signed Kerry's medical report of the wound. "This gentleman is not the man who is on the report," he said.

Letson said that Carreon, a lower-ranked "hospitalman," was "present at the time and he, in fact, made the entry into Lt. Kerry's medical record."

Bad move, Team Kerry. The letter from the lawyers turns this into a bigger story, and the argument that these men are “phony” doesn’t seem all that strong

““If we look at Kerry’s behavior after the war and his voting record in the Senate, we can deduce what his real purpose was during the Vietnam War; he is no hero, but he is a Socialist””

-So Kerry was fighting on the side of the Vietnamese? He was anti-America? His real purpose was to assist the enemy?

Or are you saying his purpose to enlist in the war was to fake injuries and award himself bogus medals so when he made a run for office he would have those to look like a hero?

You don’t really think that, I know you don’t. (And if you do, why did he re-enlist if he had already done his tour of duty?)

“and along with his Socialist, European wife they will ruin this country if elected.”

  • You hate people from other countries, huh? You hate people different from yourself, too? Or just “Europeans”?

You should remember that everyone in the US except for native Americans came from other countries at some point.

-His wife has been Republican for most of her life, even when she married John, and only changed to Democrat recently

-So Kerry will ruin the country.

Yes, he could put the US into the biggest deficit in the history of this country, $374 billion, the highest ever in dollar terms.

-He could ruin our country’s image further in the Arab world, and put strains on the relationships with many of our allies

-he could start an unnecessary and expensive war based on non-existent WMD where our soldiers are dying for nothing and where the people of the country we liberated now hate us more than before we invaded

Oh wait, that’s w that did that.

You can’t request a medal for yourself. Maybe you think the Navy are a bunch of pussies who award themselves medals every time they break a fingernail?

Today, one of the the Swift Boat Vets (George Elliott) retracted his statements against Kerry:

Veteran retracts criticism of Kerry
By Michael Kranish, Globe Staff
August 6, 2004

WASHINGTON - A week after Senator John F. Kerry heralded his wartime experience by surrounding himself at the Democratic convention with his Vietnam ''Band of Brothers," a separate group of veterans has launched a television ad campaign and a book that questions the basis for some of Kerry’s combat medals.

But yesterday, a key figure in the anti-Kerry campaign, Kerry’s former commanding officer, backed off one of the key contentions. Lieutenant Commander George Elliott said in an interview that he had made a ''terrible mistake" in signing an affidavit that suggests Kerry did not deserve the Silver Star – one of the main allegations in the book. The affidavit was given to The Boston Globe by the anti-Kerry group to justify assertions in their ad and book.

Elliott is quoted as saying that Kerry ''lied about what occurred in Vietnam . . . for example, in connection with his Silver Star, I was never informed that he had simply shot a wounded, fleeing Viet Cong in the back."

The statement refers to an episode in which Kerry killed a Viet Cong soldier who had been carrying a rocket launcher, part of a chain of events that formed the basis of his Silver Star. Over time, some Kerry critics have questioned whether the soldier posed a danger to Kerry’s crew. Crew members have said Kerry’s actions saved their lives.

Yesterday, reached at his home, Elliott said he regretted signing the affidavit and said he still thinks Kerry deserved the Silver Star.

''I still don’t think he shot the guy in the back," Elliott said. ''It was a terrible mistake probably for me to sign the affidavit with those words. I’m the one in trouble here."

Elliott said he was no under personal or political pressure to sign the statement, but he did feel ''time pressure" from those involved in the book. ''That’s no excuse," Elliott said. ''I knew it was wrong . . . In a hurry I signed it and faxed it back. That was a mistake."

The affidavit also contradicted earlier statements by Elliott, who came to Boston during Kerry’s 1996 Senate campaign to defend Kerry on similar charges, saying that Kerry acted properly and deserved the Silver Star.

The book, ''Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry," is to be published next week. Yesterday it reached number one on the bestseller list on Amazon.com, based on advance orders, in part because of publicity about it on the Drudge Report.

The book seeks to undermine one of the central claims of Kerry’s campaign – that his Vietnam War heroism would make him a good commander in chief.

While the Regnery Publishing yesterday declined to release an advance copy of the book, Drudge’s website quotes it as saying, ''Elliott indicates that a Silver Star recommendation would not have been made by him had he been aware of the actual facts."???

Meanwhile, a television advertising campaign began yesterday featuring many of the anti-Kerry veterans who are quoted in the book, including Elliott. In the ad, Elliott says, ''John Kerry has not been honest about what happened in Vietnam."

Asked to supply evidence to support that statement, the anti-Kerry group provided a copy of Elliott’s affidavit. Elliott said the same affidavit had been used in the production of the book.

It is unclear whether the work contains further justification for the assertion, beyond Elliott’s statement.

Kerry won the Silver Star for his action on Feb. 28, 1969, in which he shot a Viet Cong soldier who had been carrying a rocket launcher and running toward a hut. All of Kerry’s crewmates who participated and are still living said in interviews last year that the action was necessary and appropriate, and it was Elliott who recommended Kerry for the Silver Star.

In an interview for a seven-part biographical series that appeared in the Globe last year, Kerry said: ''I don’t have a second’s question" about killing the Viet Cong. ''He was running away with a live B-40, and, I thought, poised to turn around and fire it."

Asked whether that meant that he had shot the guerrilla in the back, Kerry said, ''No, absolutely not," adding that the enemy had been running to a hut for cover, where he could have destroyed Kerry’s boat and killed the crew.

The forthcoming book is coauthored by Jerome R. Corsi and John O’Neill, a former Vietnam naval officer who in 1971 debated Kerry on the Dick Cavett show, challenging Kerry’s assertion that US atrocities had been widespread in Vietnam. O’Neill met with then-President Richard M. Nixon for an hour before debating Kerry, and his efforts were encouraged by Nixon’s aides.

O’Neill could not be reached for comment yesterday. President Bush’s campaign denied working with O’Neill on the book or with the producers of the television advertisement.

Meanwhile, Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona, urged Bush yesterday to disassociate himself from what he called a ''dishonest and dishonorable" attack. In response, the White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, said, ''We have not and we will not question Senator Kerry’s service in Vietnam."

The Associated Press reported yesterday that Houston home-builder Bob J. Perry, a major Republican donor, gave at least $100,000 to the organization sponsoring the ad, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

The Kerry campaign spokesman, Michael Meehan, said none of those in the ad had served on a boat with Kerry. ''Some of these men defended John Kerry’s honor on his military record in 1996 and so they were either lying then or lying now," Meehan said. ''Either way, it is gutter politics."

The book also raises questions about the action of March 13, 1969, for which Kerry was awarded a Bronze Star and his third Purple Heart, according to an advance chapter of the book.

The anti-Kerry group provided three affidavits from veterans on nearby boats questioning aspects of the award.

On that day, Kerry rescued James Rassmann, who went overboard as a result of an explosion. Rassmann appeared by Kerry’s side during the Iowa caucus campaign and at last week’s Democratic National Convention, telling the story of how Kerry pulled him out of the water while his boat was under fire.

As in the case of the Silver Star, it was Elliott who recommended Kerry for the Bronze Star. According to the recommendation signed by Elliott, a mine exploded under a boat accompanying Kerry’s craft.

''Almost simultaneously, another mine detonated close aboard [Kerry’s] PCF-94, knocking First Lieutenant Rassman [sic] into the water and wounding Lt. JG Kerry in the right arm."

Elliott then described how Kerry ''managed to pull Lt. Rassman aboard despite the painful wound in his right arm." Elliott concluded that Kerry had been ''calm, professional, and highly courageous in the face of enemy fire."

Elliott, in the interview yesterday, said that based on the affidavits of the veterans on other boats, he now thinks his assessment about the Bronze Star and third Purple Heart may have been based on poor information.

In one affidavit, for example, Van O’Dell, who said he had been in a boat near Kerry on that day, declared that Kerry had ''lied" about what happened on that day and said that Rassmann was not under enemy fire when Kerry pulled him aboard.

Elliott, asked about the contradiction between his recommendation and his new questioning of Kerry’s third Purple Heart, responded, ''It makes me look kind of silly, to be perfectly honest."

But he said: ''I simply have no reason for these guys to be lying, and if they are lying in concert, it is one hell of a conspiracy. So, on the basis of all of the information that has come out, I have chosen to believe the other men. I absolutely do not know first hand."

Naval documents said that Kerry ''received shrapnel wounds in left buttocks and contusions on right forearm when a mine detonated close to PCF 94 while engaged in operations on river. Condition and prognosis excellent. Result of hostile action."

Rassmann, reached by telephone yesterday, said he has never had any question that Kerry deserved the Purple Heart. He said there were two separate events: One was earlier in the day, when he and Kerry blew up a rice cache, and the explosion caused some of the rice to hit Kerry, and perhaps some weapon fragments as well. The second involved a mine explosion as Kerry and Rassmann were on patrol. The explosion, Rassmann said, knocked him overboard and threw Kerry against the pilot house, injuring his arm.

Rassmann said that he has always believed that Kerry got the third Purple Heart solely for the injury to his arm as a result of the explosion in the water.

''If he got fragments in the buttocks due to the mine, that is new information to me," Rassmann said.

''I would say there is confusion. Maybe they did lump it together. It was my understanding he got it for the wound being thrown across the pilot house."

Either way, Rassmann said, Kerry deserved the third Purple Heart because such awards are given for injuries incurred in combat, and Kerry’s arm injury qualified. He also stood by his recollection that he was under fire when rescued by Kerry.

Those questioning Kerry’s medals, Rassmann said, are ''angry about John speaking out against the [Vietnam] war."

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/08/06/veteran_retracts_criticism_of_kerry/

Kerry Gets Hero of Socialist Labor Title and Medal

Our Politbureau unanimously voted today to award Comrade Kerry the title of Hero of Socialist Labor for his selfless achievements in space exploration for the good of all humanity. This title and medal are given to those who selflessly kill themselves with work for little or no pay.
According to the established tradition, capitalist space explorers who get paid astronomical salaries are labeled disdainfully “astronauts.” At the same time, socialist space explorers who selflessly toil in space for no or minimum pay are known among the masses by their affectionate name, “cosmonauts.” Thus, Kerry has become the first American Cosmonaut. Congratulations, Comrade, and best regards!

The bourgeois demagogues of the so-called “free press” paint John Kerry as being “soft” on communism. What an understatement! We couldn’t have had a better comrade in our effort to speed up the downfall of world capitalism!

See examples of John Kerry being a useful idoloclast:

Our Comrade Kerry is not liked by many in the Imperial American Military.

The good comrade teaches the lessons of propaganda: “The convention is orchestrated as a big show, [there are] a large number of participants, they use the stage for propaganda,” Kerimli [chairman of the Azerbaijan Popular Front Party’s reformist wing] said. “The convention itself does not decide anything because all decisions have already been taken. The convention simply illustrates the will of the candidate to win, the presentation of his team, of his program – this was of particular interest to me.”

Comrade Kerry supports comrade Sandinista junta leader Daniel Ortega

Comrade Kerry honored at a Ho Chi Minh City museum

Comrade Kerry proud of pro-Hanoi activism

Communist Party USA supports Comrade Kerry

Imperialist soldiers denounce former brother. Nobody loves Hanoi Jane better.

Just go to this website:

Catholics see red when Comrade Kerry is mentioned

Comrade Kerry does not bow down to US capitalist pig laws

Comrade Kerry above the law in this imperialist state

Comrade Kerry uses POWs as tools for his message

Comrade Kerry says France a good spot to meet fellow Reds

Communist paper The Daily Worker praises Hanoi John

Comrade Kerry chooses Red Poetry as campaign theme.

North Korea supports a Kerry Regime

KERRY: A USEFUL IDOLOCLAST

The bourgeois demagogues of the so-called “free press” paint John Kerry as being “soft” on communism. What an understatement! We couldn’t have had a better comrade in our effort to speed up the downfall of world capitalism!

Just go their website you will see all of this and more. Very scary it is:

http://communis.server296.com/

Socialists Urge Support for Kerry
Despite substantial disagreements America socialists plan to work for Kerry’s election.

Joe

The following statement from Swift Boat Veterans for Truth is in response to an article appearing in the morning edition of the Boston Globe (?Veteran Retracts Criticism of Kerry?) which implies that one Vietnam Veteran wishes to retract an affidavit he signed regarding John Kerry?s actions during and after Kerry?s time in Vietnam. The signed affidavit can be seen below.

"Captain George Elliott describes an article appearing in today?s edition of the Boston Globe by Mike Kranish as extremely inaccurate and highly misstating his actual views. He reaffirms his statement in the current advertisement paid for by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, Captain Elliott reaffirms his affidavit [see below] in support of that advertisement, and he reaffirms his request that the ad be played.

?Additional documentation will follow. ?The article by Mr. Kranish is particularly surprising given page 102 of Mr. Kranish?s own book quoting John Kerry as acknowledging that he killed a single, wounded, fleeing Viet Cong soldier whom he was afraid would turn around.

?Swift Boat Veterans for Truth has more than 250 supporters who are revealing first hand, eyewitness accounts of numerous incidents concerning John Kerry?s military service record. The organization will continue to discuss much of what John Kerry has reported as fact concerning his four-month tour of duty in Vietnam.?

http://humaneventsonline.com.edgesuite.net/unfit_aff.html

Hey Lumpy,

Don’t suppose the author of that article Kranish has a bit of conflict of interest do you?

BOSTON GLOBE ‘REPORTER’ COMMISSIONED TO WRITE OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN BOOK FOREWORD – WHILE COVERING KERRY

BOSTON GLOBE journalist Mike Kranish has been commissioned to write the foreword of the Kerry-Edwards campaign book – just as he is covering the campaign in an official capacity as a journalist for the BOSTON GLOBE!

Kranish made waves on Friday by reporting in the GLOBE how a key figure in the anti-Kerry vet ad campaign, Kerry’s former commanding officer, “backed off one of the key contentions.”

But Captain George Elliott claims the Kranish article is “extremely inaccurate” and highly misstated his actual views.

[TV Station WTVG 13-ABC, Toledo, Ohio dropped the anti-Kerry vet ad on Friday after the Kerry campaign used the GLOBE/Kranish story to convince the station’s management the ad was false.]

Developing…

Hey Lumpy,

Don’t suppose the author of that article Kranish has a bit of conflict of interest do you?

BOSTON GLOBE ‘REPORTER’ COMMISSIONED TO WRITE OFFICIAL CAMPAIGN BOOK FOREWORD – WHILE COVERING KERRY

BOSTON GLOBE journalist Mike Kranish has been commissioned to write the foreword of the Kerry-Edwards campaign book – just as he is covering the campaign in an official capacity as a journalist for the BOSTON GLOBE!

Kranish made waves on Friday by reporting in the GLOBE how a key figure in the anti-Kerry vet ad campaign, Kerry’s former commanding officer, “backed off one of the key contentions.”

But Captain George Elliott claims the Kranish article is “extremely inaccurate” and highly misstated his actual views.

[TV Station WTVG 13-ABC, Toledo, Ohio dropped the anti-Kerry vet ad on Friday after the Kerry campaign used the GLOBE/Kranish story to convince the station’s management the ad was false.]

Developing…

Kerry must feel awful that so many of his former comrades in arms think so poorly of him.

Personally, I thought he was a war hero until I read their account of what really happened, now I am wondering. I wonder if the electorate is having second thoughts as well? And that was one of his strong points too…shame.

SNOPES is a website that debunks bullshit internet rumors and urban legends.

See what they say about Kerry’s Viet Nam service: