Superman vs Thor

[quote]Pootie Tang wrote:

I need some help from my fellow comic geeks. I read the main arc of Marvel Civil War, and never got to see the return of Thor. I hear that Thor came down and fucked up iron man for the BS he pulled during the Civil War arc. Can someone direct me to the issues that takes place in. Also the issues where Thor gets the Odinforce. I must analyze this info and give a serious answer to the question.

Wolbarret is a Comic book guru but a bias bastard. If we said Superman vs Punisher he would say the punisher would win. So I need to do my homework in order to to answer this question. There are some versions of Superman that are past godlike like Superman Prime, or the Superman that flew through the sun and was uberpowerful but lost his humanity. I mean Thor fights a bunch of Construction workers (The wrecking crew) and has a hard time dealing with them. So I need some hard evidence.[/quote]

Superman would be a cool character if:

  1. They chose a set list of powers and STUCK TO IT!
  2. They those a set list of weaknesses and STUCK TO IT!!!
  3. They let other super heroes save the world without Superman being the key factor.
  4. Stop basing end boss villains around Superman. For example: Superman Prime

What sense does it make to have 3 different Supermans? “Ok guys, I’ll have Superman Prime be the villain. None of the heroes in the DC universe can beat him…until Superman shows up. But even that Superman can’t beat him. So that means we’ll bring in 2nd Superman and he’ll beat him!”

In the meantime, you have legit heroes like Martian Manhunter, Firestorm(RIP), Captain Atom, Wonder Woman, Captain Marvel/Shazaam, and Orion sitting their with dicks in the hand thinking “Why the fuck did I even join the JLA…Superman is the only superhero the world needs”

Dude, I would never say Punisher beats Superman. And Batman could never Superman. He can plan all he wants. Superman will simply run up to him, smash his brains in, and the fight is over.

Also, I don’t mention Silver Age Superman because I feel no need to mention people who can move planets simply by pushing them.

Silver Age Superman = Fuck logic

It’s comics, logic does not apply and if you want it to your dumb. Of course in a real world Batman would get owned by Supes, however this is comics where rich bilionaires can be vigilantes at night and all sorts of crazy shit can happen. Logic go do math or something and stop reading comics.

[quote]drewh wrote:
It’s comics, logic does not apply and if you want it to your dumb. Of course in a real world Batman would get owned by Supes, however this is comics where rich bilionaires can be vigilantes at night and all sorts of crazy shit can happen. Logic go do math or something and stop reading comics.[/quote]

Good stories require a suspension of disbelief and a logic inside the diagesis. Otherwise the story could just be chaos set in a world without rules. It’s detrimental to the discussion to pipe up with stuff like that because it’s very easy to say “Comics aren’t real anyway”.

Comics = Literature

Literature = Thought

[quote]RTJenforcer wrote:
drewh wrote:
It’s comics, logic does not apply and if you want it to your dumb. Of course in a real world Batman would get owned by Supes, however this is comics where rich bilionaires can be vigilantes at night and all sorts of crazy shit can happen. Logic go do math or something and stop reading comics.

Good stories require a suspension of disbelief and a logic inside the diagesis. Otherwise the story could just be chaos set in a world without rules. It’s detrimental to the discussion to pipe up with stuff like that because it’s very easy to say “Comics aren’t real anyway”.

Comics = Literature

Literature = Thought[/quote]

It’s early, but I’m going to go ahead and cook my burgers over the charred remains of drewh.

Would be horrible to let such a powerful burn go to waste.

Just wanna add that I love these superhero threads. As long as there are ppl like wol and others who can discuss and educate (in my case) its a very interesting read.

[quote]WolBarret wrote:
ComixGuy wrote:
Already happened in a George Perez crossover between the JLA and Avengers. Supes beat Thor, but said he was the single toughest opponent he had ever fought. After the rest of the Avengers look over from their battles and see that he beat Thor, they all jump Superman and stomp him to the ground. The villians in the story that dupe them into fighting each other are Kronos (DC) and Gamesmaster (Marvel). This is classic Supes vs classic Thor.

Look it up.

So why is it that Superman is weak against magic and kryptonite, but when he’s about to get smashed by one of the most powerful mystical items in the Marvel Universe(Mjolnir), Superman grabs it flat side and holds it. Superman is vulnerable to Magic just like any normal human being. So he would have taken that hit like any normal human being. He should have died.

If George Perez actually used the weakness to magic trait that Superman has, the Hammer would have smashed through him and broke Supes in half.

Also, at the end of the crossover, you have Superman holding Wonder Woman’s Lasso, Thor’s Hammer, and Captain America’s shield. It shouldn’t have been called “JLA vs Avengers”, it should have been called “Fuck comic book history, Superman will win regardless if it makes sense or not”

A pure one on one brawl: Thor wins. Better fighter, same stats as his opponent, and a Hammer plays into the opponents WEAKNESS to magic.[/quote]

Wol,

I admire your commitment towards one hero, but you are forgetting a couple of things. 1) Marvel, who has a much greater vested interest than your allegiances, agreed to this. So I think we should not dismiss this so readily. 2) You and others have stated the problem with Superman is his powers have changed over time. Thor’s powers have changed as well. Initially, Thor could not really fly. He threw his hammer and held on to it. It was one-way only and one-direction only. The only way he could levitate was to spin the hammer really fast. Now he controls his flights, ie turns in midair, stops in midair without using the hammer to do so. He also gained dimensional powers that werenâ??t originally shown. He also had to spin the hammer to block bullets, other projectiles and explosives that now he can withstand with just his body. He also has gained strength from his initial inception. And he has his own deus ex machina - a beserker rage. By the way, I am not talking about skyfather Thor or anything else, just classic.

As far as the magic thing, yes I think DC has repeatedly handled that one poorly and I have never really understood its implications nor do I think they do. I mean what is to stop someone from magically teleporting something super hard and dense, or a rock of kryptonite, inside Supes brain? Or the same thing done to the Hulk, or Thor. Or just teleporting their brains out of their bodies. No one survives that one. I hate magic in comics it f***s everything up.

Exactly Oden Force Thor and you want to complain about Superman. Burned that response shows this person has never read a comic. The writer decides diegesis so he can write whatever the fuck he wants even if it defies logic, logic decided by a previous writer. So your point is…

[quote]drewh wrote:
Exactly Oden Force Thor and you want to complain about Superman. Burned that response shows this person has never read a comic. The writer decides diegesis so he can write whatever the fuck he wants even if it defies logic, logic decided by a previous writer. So your point is…[/quote]

You’re right, the writer decides diagesis and all the rules it contains. These rules determine the logic of the world created. Without that logic to dictate events within that world, suspension of disbelief fails and everyone thinks the story is a pile of wank. My point is that a certain kind of logic does apply in comics, as in all literature.

If you think I’ve never read a comic you may want to look at some of my other posts.

you guys talking siegel and schuster superman, JLA superman, post-crisis, pre-crisis, superman 1 million orrrrr superman prime!!!

you do realize there’s a BIIIIG difference between them all?

[quote]tribunaldude wrote:
you guys talking siegel and schuster superman, JLA superman, post-crisis, pre-crisis, superman 1 million orrrrr superman prime!!!

you do realize there’s a BIIIIG difference between them all?[/quote]

That’s the problem, theres no consistency in how powerful people believe Superman to be in this discussion. However, this is irrelevant; even the most powerful incarnations of Superman are still vulnerable to magic, and thus would still be bested by the God of Thunder.

[quote]RTJenforcer wrote:
tribunaldude wrote:
you guys talking siegel and schuster superman, JLA superman, post-crisis, pre-crisis, superman 1 million orrrrr superman prime!!!

you do realize there’s a BIIIIG difference between them all?

That’s the problem, theres no consistency in how powerful people believe Superman to be in this discussion. However, this is irrelevant; even the most powerful incarnations of Superman are still vulnerable to magic, and thus would still be bested by the God of Thunder.

[/quote]

There has been inconsistency with Thor’s powers as well. Read previous post on how his powers have changed over the years. Supes isn’t the only one where they played around with powers and such. Plus, what about the other versions of Thor that have been out there? Beta-Ray Bill Thor? Sif Thor? Billy Masterson Thor? Cap Thor (yes Cap is able to pick up Mjolnir)? Frog Thor? I even remember a kid Thor at one time.
Suffice to say it but Marvel allowed their character to get beat up by DC’s character without any extenuating circumstances. - no gimmicks like souped up powers, mind-control, etc… And it was classic Thor against a classic Superman

It is their universe(s) and their rules. Crying unfair under the guise of it being inconsistent is petty and one-sided. Especially, when both companies and characters have not been consistent over time with the portrayal of their powers and sometimes characters.

I’ll respond Comic guy, just busy at the moment.


^
|
|
I guess DC/Marvel crossovers are legit

[quote]ComixGuy wrote:
WolBarret wrote:
ComixGuy wrote:
Already happened in a George Perez crossover between the JLA and Avengers. Supes beat Thor, but said he was the single toughest opponent he had ever fought. After the rest of the Avengers look over from their battles and see that he beat Thor, they all jump Superman and stomp him to the ground. The villians in the story that dupe them into fighting each other are Kronos (DC) and Gamesmaster (Marvel). This is classic Supes vs classic Thor.

Look it up.

So why is it that Superman is weak against magic and kryptonite, but when he’s about to get smashed by one of the most powerful mystical items in the Marvel Universe(Mjolnir), Superman grabs it flat side and holds it. Superman is vulnerable to Magic just like any normal human being. So he would have taken that hit like any normal human being. He should have died.

If George Perez actually used the weakness to magic trait that Superman has, the Hammer would have smashed through him and broke Supes in half.

Also, at the end of the crossover, you have Superman holding Wonder Woman’s Lasso, Thor’s Hammer, and Captain America’s shield. It shouldn’t have been called “JLA vs Avengers”, it should have been called “Fuck comic book history, Superman will win regardless if it makes sense or not”

A pure one on one brawl: Thor wins. Better fighter, same stats as his opponent, and a Hammer plays into the opponents WEAKNESS to magic.

Wol,

I admire your commitment towards one hero, but you are forgetting a couple of things. 1) Marvel, who has a much greater vested interest than your allegiances, agreed to this. So I think we should not dismiss this so readily. 2) You and others have stated the problem with Superman is his powers have changed over time. Thor’s powers have changed as well. Initially, Thor could not really fly. He threw his hammer and held on to it. It was one-way only and one-direction only. The only way he could levitate was to spin the hammer really fast. Now he controls his flights, ie turns in midair, stops in midair without using the hammer to do so. He also gained dimensional powers that werenâ??t originally shown. He also had to spin the hammer to block bullets, other projectiles and explosives that now he can withstand with just his body. He also has gained strength from his initial inception. And he has his own deus ex machina - a beserker rage. By the way, I am not talking about skyfather Thor or anything else, just classic.

As far as the magic thing, yes I think DC has repeatedly handled that one poorly and I have never really understood its implications nor do I think they do. I mean what is to stop someone from magically teleporting something super hard and dense, or a rock of kryptonite, inside Supes brain? Or the same thing done to the Hulk, or Thor. Or just teleporting their brains out of their bodies. No one survives that one. I hate magic in comics it f***s everything up.

[/quote]

Initially, Superman was strong enough to stop a train, but nothing more. He was faster than a speeding bullet, but not faster than the speed of sound or light. He could leap over tall buildings, but he couldn’t fly. So eventually, Superman had his powers amped up.

I can understand heroes being de-powered or given extra power through logical storylines. For example, when one of Thor’s villains from Asgard placed a curse on him so that his bones were brittle, he had to wear a special suit of Armor to withstand damage and not break every bone in his body. Or when Wolverine had all his adamantium ripped off and his healing factor was working at 100 percent capacity since it didn’t have to work so hard to keep him alive. This all makes sense.

But I disagree with Superman being a given a force field for concrete reason. I disagree with giving Superman a healing factor for concrete reason(this happened recently in a Superman/Batman comic where Supes got stabbed with a kryptonite, Bats pulled it out, and then Supes healed within seconds, stating “My healing factor kicked in and saved me”.

Thor’s power upgrades make sense. He’s the next in line to be Sky Father when Odin dies. Once that happens, he’ll be granted additional powers and he will be upgraded it. It makes sense.

His Hammer always had dimensional powers.

Thor by himself
-Strength
-Durablity
-Speed
-Combat experience
-Agility
-Warrior Madness(a better version of Beserker rage. I’m pretty sure Thor did this before Wolverine ever did. Probably around the early 80’s)
-Control over the elements of the storm(lightning, thunder, wind, rain, etc) he’s the God of Thunder for a reason. If Storm can manipulate the weather to help her fly, Thor can do it 10 time better and with less work

Thor’s Hammer Mjolnir
-Flight
-Opening Dimensional portals(Yes, he used to do this)
-Energy blasts
-I can’t describe this in words, but this is something he did to beat Juggernaut in a comic in the late 80’s. Juggernaut had a force field around his body which made it difficult for Thor to hurt him. Juggs beat Thor the first fight. But in the second fight, Thor threw his hammer to sky and circled either the planet or Cytorak(Juggs Power source) to block off the force field power that he was receiving. Thor had 60 seconds to beat Juggs ass barefisted. And that’s exactly what he did. Thor beat his ass and even punched off his helmet. And then he used Mjolnir to carry Juggs to a distance asteroid and left him there.
-There are other mystical powers that the hammer has, but I can’t remember them all. I’ll ask my friend what else Thor’s Hammer could do Pre-SkyFather upgrade. And he has the comics in his book shelf to prove it.

Classic Thor/Superman: Late 1970’s to 2003. That’s the version I’m talking about. Also, I AM NOT INCLUDING SILVER AGE SUPERMAN OR EARTH 3 SUPERMAN OR RED SUN SUPERMAN OR THE ANY OTHER SUPERMANS. I’m speaking about the normal continuity Superman from Post Crisis 1986-2003 Supes.

One last thing about Superman’s power( I’m basing this on the 1986-2003 Superman, which I consider classic)
-Flight
-Strength
-Speed
-Durablity
-Heat laser eyes
-Freezing breath
-Hurricane breath
-Solar Absorbtion

He’s a bad ass. But he also has weaknesses

-Kyrptonite
-Magic
-Red Sun

If any of these three hit him, he should be fucked up. Just like if Martian Manhunter fell into a bonfire, he is fucked up. Just like if Batman actually got shot, he should be fucked up. In the JLA/Avengers crossover, Superman grabbed a mystical hammer(Mjolnir) that had the force of someone as strong as him behind it(Thor). He should have died. Give me a sledgehammer that’s made of fire and I’ll let you grab it open handed while I swing at you. And at the end of that comic, all the super heroes went down and the last one to fight the boss was Superman carrying Mjolnir, Cap’s shield, and Wonder Woman’s lasso. Bullshit. I may be wrong about the lasso, though.

[quote]WolBarret wrote:

Initially, Superman was strong enough to stop a train, but nothing more. He was faster than a speeding bullet, but not faster than the speed of sound or light. He could leap over tall buildings, but he couldn’t fly. So eventually, Superman had his powers amped up.
[/quote]

HAHA flaw in your argument… a bullet is faster then the speed of sound :stuck_out_tongue:

I think it is unfortunate that you have to put it in such uncertain terms to get your point across Wol. I predict you’re still going to get people arguing with you. Oh well, we tried…

[quote]RTJenforcer wrote:
I think it is unfortunate that you have to put it in such uncertain terms to get your point across Wol. I predict you’re still going to get people arguing with you. Oh well, we tried…[/quote]

This is better than the “Thor vs Wolverine” discussion I had in real life.

And discussing this is better than the faggy cat obsession going on in the "Ever Feel Like A " thread.

[quote]WolBarret wrote:
RTJenforcer wrote:
I think it is unfortunate that you have to put it in such uncertain terms to get your point across Wol. I predict you’re still going to get people arguing with you. Oh well, we tried…

This is better than the “Thor vs Wolverine” discussion I had in real life.

And discussing this is better than the faggy cat obsession going on in the "Ever Feel Like A " thread.[/quote]

I <3 cats.

[quote]imhungry wrote:
WolBarret wrote:
RTJenforcer wrote:
I think it is unfortunate that you have to put it in such uncertain terms to get your point across Wol. I predict you’re still going to get people arguing with you. Oh well, we tried…

This is better than the “Thor vs Wolverine” discussion I had in real life.

And discussing this is better than the faggy cat obsession going on in the "Ever Feel Like A " thread.

I <3 cats.[/quote]

This is why we don’t hang out, Hungry. This is why.

[quote]WolBarret wrote:
RTJenforcer wrote:
I think it is unfortunate that you have to put it in such uncertain terms to get your point across Wol. I predict you’re still going to get people arguing with you. Oh well, we tried…

This is better than the “Thor vs Wolverine” discussion I had in real life.

And discussing this is better than the faggy cat obsession going on in the "Ever Feel Like A " thread.[/quote]

THIS we agree on! Maybe we take this conversation over to that thread?

[quote]WolBarret wrote:
I may be wrong about the lasso, though.[/quote]

I think you are but lack the energy to drag the books out.

Anyway, we are going to agree to disagree. Although, there is one final point that I will make. The only way to lengthen a product’s lifecycle is to come out with a ‘newer’ or ‘improved’ or whats in vogue now , ‘retro’ version. And Superman, as is any character, is a product and the more successful the product the harder it is to maintain its lifecycle. So, yes Superman being published 30-40-yrs earlier than Thor and being more mainstream successful has had to have more varations to extend the product life cycle. But you have to give credence that Thor has changed from his inception (newer) and gotten more powerful (improved) and then became ‘skyfather’ Thor (even more improved) and gone back to more classic Thor(retro) since he has given up his odinforce to fix his hammer. I may be wrong at that last one, as I may be behind the times.

Superman is vulnerable to magic and the one thing I have hated since DC messed this up is they have never ever said how vulnerable. A lot of people have assumed it is normal human vulnerable…maybe it isn’t. Maybe it is more like he isn’t invulnerable, but still durable? I am guessing here, so don’t tear it down, needlessly. Besides I hate magic. It totally is the ultimate weapon and really no one can defeat it, unless the magic holder is an absolute idiot.

I tell you the next time I am at comic-con or have a chance to talk to a dc person, I will try and get this clarified.