I read this a while ago and wanted to hear the T-Nation side to this. Greens+ is significantly cheaper, but I have a ton of respect for Biotest, so I wanted I thought their biochem geniuses could probably marshal a pretty solid rebuttal.
Here is Berardi’s comment:
[quote]Hey All,
I’ve gotten a ton of emails about this article so I figured I’d pop over and respond.
-
To begin with, before anyone thinks TC and I are going to war or anything like that, I’d like to remind everyone that TC and I like eachother. We’ve worked together for 8 years. We often agree on things. It’s just that this is one time we don’t. And, I don’t want to speak for TC. But I think that it’s ok by both of us that we don’t agree sometimes.
-
Next, I believe that TC’s claim about acid/base status being a non-issue isn’t accurate according to the research. High grain and high protein diets have been shown to have a detrimental affect on cortisol and acid/base status. This has been measured in more than one study. The fact that a high intake of fruits and veggies (and/or greens+) carries with it an excellent PRAL score suggests that this high intake would be very beneficial in a high net acid diet. If you’re interested in reading more about this, check out the research studies cited in my article here…pay particular attention to the studies cited…even pull them up at your local library if you want to read them.
http://www.T-Nation.com/readArticle.do?id=4602222
- In addition, TC’s notion that a small amount of licorice is testosterone-zapping is also contestable. Check out this article. In it you’ll see that it takes about 10g of licorice to reduce testosterone. Doses in greens+ are much, much smaller (100mg).
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0ISW/is_265-266/ai_n15688809/print
- I’m sure this debate could continue on without TC or I budging with respect to our recommendations so I’ll only note more more thing - perhaps the most important thing. DISCLOSURE ALERT. I occupy an unpaid spot on the research board of Genuine Health (the Canadian distributors of greens+). Again, it’s a volunteer position. And in this position, I’m asked to evaluate the research on their products both published and ongoing. To this end, I’ve been privy to all the research on the product. The research summaries for studies - both published and in the pipeline - are below:
www.johnberardi.com/research_summary.pdf
From this you’ll see some really interesting benefits directly associated with this product - independent of theoretical objections.
I’ll wrap it up here. I hope this helps clarify why I recommend greens products and why I like, in particular, greens+. I haven’t seen any other brands so well researched.
And remember, even though TC and I disagree on this one, this time, that doesn’t mean we’re going to meet in a dark alley in Indiana, or somewhere 1/2 way between Ontario and California, to throw down. Unless the winner takes home 100 bottles of Metabolic Drive. Then, you might see some fisticuffs.
JB [/quote]