Stupid Questions You Were Afraid to Ask

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
hungry4more wrote:
Or maybe they’re just made of equally heavy but stronger metal…oooh the controversy! Now we can never know how much weight we’re actually lifting lol, we’ll have to carry scales with us to gyms to make sure.

And 20 kg is 44 lbs…I don’t think it’s all THAT significant…

why are you getting all girly snippy?

at least the guy asked the question.

This is why folks don’t want to ask questions, some guys get their panties in a wad.[/quote]

Haha it was meant in jest, jeez! Is everyone’s sarcasm detector broken?

[quote]hungry4more wrote:
OctoberGirl wrote:
hungry4more wrote:
Or maybe they’re just made of equally heavy but stronger metal…oooh the controversy! Now we can never know how much weight we’re actually lifting lol, we’ll have to carry scales with us to gyms to make sure.

And 20 kg is 44 lbs…I don’t think it’s all THAT significant…

why are you getting all girly snippy?

at least the guy asked the question.

This is why folks don’t want to ask questions, some guys get their panties in a wad.

Haha it was meant in jest, jeez! Is everyone’s sarcasm detector broken?[/quote]

oh my bad then. It seems like everyone else got your sarcasm but me! Sorry I girlied out on your humor.

back to the humor and my apologies.

[quote]hungry4more wrote:
Or maybe they’re just made of equally heavy but stronger metal…[/quote]

most steel (what bars are made out of) can be made harder by the addition of alloying elements or heat treatment. This would not change the density of the bar (or the resulting weight) but would make them stronger / more ductile and better suited for higher weight.

Sorry, I had too…

A standard squat bar will weigh 55. The Mastodon weighs 65. They both are longer and thicker than standard bars.

Its unlikely that the average commercial gym goer will encounter these specialty bars as they are made to handle heavy weights.

I’ve got mixed feelings about the spirit of this thread. On the one hand I don’t like the inference that any question is ‘stupid’ or that anyone who asks one ought to feel sheepish. On the other, I applaud, loudly, the effort to remove any long-standing, festering areas of ignorance.

I’ve been lifting on and off for 20 years, and only recently found out that calories are sub-sub properties of food, in the way that protein, carbs and fats are sub-properties, where before I thought cals were on the same level, a fourth sub-property. I recently found that out here, and I’m PROUD I added 50Ibs of lean muscle never even knowing this basic nutritional fact.

Anywyay, do I have a question I think will get only stupid, or more likely zero replies? Yep.

What’s the name and address of a Physio/Chiro in NW London with extensive experience in fixing shoulder injuries?

[quote]Jaybee wrote:
I’ve got mixed feelings about the spirit of this thread. On the one hand I don’t like the inference that any question is ‘stupid’ or that anyone who asks one ought to feel sheepish. On the other, I applaud, loudly, the effort to remove any long-standing, festering areas of ignorance.

I’ve been lifting on and off for 20 years, and only recently found out that calories are sub-sub properties of food, in the way that protein, carbs and fats are sub-properties, where before I thought cals were on the same level, a fourth sub-property. I recently found that out here, and I’m PROUD I added 50Ibs of lean muscle never even knowing this basic nutritional fact.

Anywyay, do I have a question I think will get only stupid, or more likely zero replies? Yep.

What’s the name and address of a Physio/Chiro in NW London with extensive experience in fixing shoulder injuries?[/quote]

Have you asked BushidoBadBoy about the chiro? I think he was or is a chiro student so he may have some good suggestions for you.

Here’s a stupid one…

How much weight can a standard 45lb bar withstand on one side with the other side being empty before it tips over? This is a question more related to physics than bb, but I’m curious, nonetheless. I believe the most I’ve ever had on one side, while the other side was empty, was 2 45lb plates. Who dares to go higher?

Stupid questions?? Hmmm… I’ve asked all of mine already…

I could the bar… it’s just known that one plate a side is ‘135’ two is ‘225’ 3 is ‘315’… I figured that was universal… shrugs Guess not… lol :slight_smile:

[quote]kylec72 wrote:
Here’s a stupid one…

How much weight can a standard 45lb bar withstand on one side with the other side being empty before it tips over? This is a question more related to physics than bb, but I’m curious, nonetheless. I believe the most I’ve ever had on one side, while the other side was empty, was 2 45lb plates. Who dares to go higher? [/quote]

I’m pretty sure I’ve had two 45’s and a 25, but the bar was pushed as far right as it could on the rack, which probably saved it from tipping over. I definitely probably wouldn’t do it again, let alone anything higher.

And responding the the first question, I’ve always counted the bar when lifting. I was always taught to, seems wierd not to.

Here are a few of mine.

Why are all the people here (in the gym I used to go to) so fucking fat?

Why are all the people here (in the gym I currently go to) so fucking stupid?

I’m afraid to ask someone who’s benching why they would ever lift their legs in the air for the fear of an answer so retarded I’d die laughing.

Boy I could go on and on.

[quote]kylec72 wrote:
Here’s a stupid one…

How much weight can a standard 45lb bar withstand on one side with the other side being empty before it tips over? This is a question more related to physics than bb, but I’m curious, nonetheless. I believe the most I’ve ever had on one side, while the other side was empty, was 2 45lb plates. Who dares to go higher? [/quote]

depends on the width of the rack, I went to a gym with a narrow rack and 2 20kg plates on one side was enough for it to start to tip.

[quote]kylec72 wrote:
Here’s a stupid one…

How much weight can a standard 45lb bar withstand on one side with the other side being empty before it tips over? This is a question more related to physics than bb, but I’m curious, nonetheless. I believe the most I’ve ever had on one side, while the other side was empty, was 2 45lb plates. Who dares to go higher? [/quote]

Haha, my buddy and I were actually discussing this, I’ve found it depends more on the rack.

Are we supposed to count the weight of our hands in addition to the weight of the bar?

[quote]kylec72 wrote:
Here’s a stupid one…

How much weight can a standard 45lb bar withstand on one side with the other side being empty before it tips over? This is a question more related to physics than bb, but I’m curious, nonetheless. I believe the most I’ve ever had on one side, while the other side was empty, was 2 45lb plates. Who dares to go higher? [/quote]

haha that’s something i always wondered too…the most i go is having 2 45’s on each side

Here’s a stupid question:
If emotional states can effect T-levels, then if you lift while pissed off or horny, would that be more anabolic?

[quote]sen say wrote:
Are we supposed to count the weight of our hands in addition to the weight of the bar? [/quote]

you should also include the weight of your big head

[quote]50_Caliber wrote:
Here’s a stupid question:
If emotional states can effect T-levels, then if you lift while pissed off or horny, would that be more anabolic?

[/quote]

I lift really well if I’m pissed off.

Not so much when the other.

[quote]Cable wrote:
I believe he’s referring to this thread: http://www.T-Nation.com/free_online_forum/sports_body_training_performance_bodybuilding/countingthe_bar
[/quote]

It all makes sense now, lol.

[quote]chimera182 wrote:
kylec72 wrote:
Here’s a stupid one…

How much weight can a standard 45lb bar withstand on one side with the other side being empty before it tips over? This is a question more related to physics than bb, but I’m curious, nonetheless. I believe the most I’ve ever had on one side, while the other side was empty, was 2 45lb plates. Who dares to go higher?

Haha, my buddy and I were actually discussing this, I’ve found it depends more on the rack.[/quote]

Bingo.

The physics are pretty simple: an uneven load on one side or the bar is going to create a torque about the axis of the nearer J-hook. The bar will tip (that is, rotate about that axis) when that torque is greater than the torque exerted by the mass of the (empty) part of the bar on the other side of the J-hook.

Basically, the closer the support is to the loaded side, the larger load it will take to tip the bar.

This will also depend on the weight of the bar (it will take a larger load to tip a heavier bar), and the elasticity of the bar (more elastic means greater load because some of the energy will be spent deforming the bar).

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

you should also include the weight of your big head

[/quote]

How’d you like to include the weight of my other head the next time you step on the scale missy?