[quote]dankid wrote:
Whatever guys, either way you wont catch me doing curls, lat pulldowns, crunches, or leg extensions.
I never judged these guys by their size, other than the fact that if the guy deadlifting 155 needed to use a alternate grip, then he had some seriously weak forearms.
I understand that if something works, people will use it, but people have overcomplicated fitness completely. In my opinion all that matters is,
-
Choosing the “best” exercises to achieve your goals. 9/10 times these are compound
-
Progress from week to week.
-
Put emphasis on rest and nutrition.
-
If something isn’t working as you wished it to, then switch what your doing.
I could just ignore all the ignorance that i have seen in the gym and now on this site, but it effects me in more ways than one. Health is such a problem in the US, and people have been spreading horrible info over the past years, instead of focusing on the basic principles, like those above. Things are getting better though, I see females lifting weights, and more and more people doing O-lifts and such. Luckily the “core craze” seems to be over. I still am pissed at the fact that people think weight lifting makes you gain weight, and cardio makes you lose weight.
Sorry though, I dont know what im talking about cause i dont weight more than 200lbs. Oh wait, theres a lot of 200+ lbs people at mcdonalds, id better go ask them about working out.
Oh, and I would definately disagree that curls are the best bicep exercise. Rows and chinups will always be superior.[/quote]
A few things you may want to consider.
The body is capable of doing compound exercises AND isolation exercises, you don’t actually have to choose.
Do you think that people will want to pay someone who doesn’t even believe that they can improve themselves to help them reach their goals?
Will you be offering refunds to anyone who turns out not to be a genetic freak?
All things being equal would you not expect someone to gain muscle and therefore weight if they are getting stronger (assuming they didn’t start out overweight)?
You mention that you like the authors on this site as they “aren’t scared to use “unconventional” methods” while maintaining that there is only one way to train. Do you not realise that you are being hypocritical?
Aren’t results more important than theories?
Not trying to give you a hard time here but you sound like you could use a little less “knowledge” and a little more experience.