Jeeze you far righties got your paranoid schizophrenic side a really going today.[/quote]
One more of your typical posts attacking the right…from the left.
How long did you think you could do this before others would notice that you’re no more a libertarian than Karl Marx
Not long as long as you thought huh?
[/quote]
Yes, it was definitely an attack from the left by pointing out that the poster was saying Palin wasn’t very manly because she was a woman. Dumbass. Way to put a political connotation on something that has no political backing whatsoever. I guess it’s a liberal thing to call a woman a woman? What the fuck do republicans call them?
Zeb you’re clinically insane.
Tell you what bud. You can think I’m as far left as Karl Marx or as far right as Ayn Rand I don’t really give a shit, but I would appreciate it if you just e-mailed me to bash me instead of clogging up every thread with your rants about me. I can provide you my e-mail that way the rest of the forum doesn’t have to constantly get sidetracked every time I post because you have to follow me up by saying you got me.
The difference between Reagan and Obama is more of a generational gap and not a valid comparison. Why has nobody posted manly pictures of Romney/Ryan yet?
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
The difference between Reagan and Obama is more of a generational gap and not a valid comparison. Why has nobody posted manly pictures of Romney/Ryan yet?[/quote]
Ryan is a P90 xer, and known to be in pretty good shape. I’m not sure Romney has ever sweated in his life.
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
The difference between Reagan and Obama is more of a generational gap and not a valid comparison. Why has nobody posted manly pictures of Romney/Ryan yet?[/quote]
Ryan is a P90 xer, and known to be in pretty good shape. I’m not sure Romney has ever sweated in his life. [/quote]
Yep I’m just waiting for someone to use p90x as an example of being masculine.
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
The difference between Reagan and Obama is more of a generational gap and not a valid comparison. Why has nobody posted manly pictures of Romney/Ryan yet?[/quote]
Ryan is a P90 xer, and known to be in pretty good shape. I’m not sure Romney has ever sweated in his life. [/quote]
What is considered good shape? Being a skinny 40 year old?
[quote]sufiandy wrote:
The difference between Reagan and Obama is more of a generational gap and not a valid comparison. Why has nobody posted manly pictures of Romney/Ryan yet?[/quote]
Ryan is a P90 xer, and known to be in pretty good shape. I’m not sure Romney has ever sweated in his life. [/quote]
What is considered good shape? Being a skinny 40 year old? [/quote]
I have no idea. I’d say Ryan is better off than the average 42 year old though wouldn’t you? Most 40 year olds I know couldn’t dream of doing P90X, a lot of them get tired taking a walk.
Jeeze you far righties got your paranoid schizophrenic side a really going today.[/quote]
One more of your typical posts attacking the right…from the left.
How long did you think you could do this before others would notice that you’re no more a libertarian than Karl Marx
Not long as long as you thought huh?
[/quote]
Yes, it was definitely an attack from the left by pointing out that the poster was saying Palin wasn’t very manly because she was a woman. Dumbass. Way to put a political connotation on something that has no political backing whatsoever. I guess it’s a liberal thing to call a woman a woman? What the fuck do republicans call them?
Zeb you’re clinically insane.
Tell you what bud. You can think I’m as far left as Karl Marx or as far right as Ayn Rand I don’t really give a shit, but I would appreciate it if you just e-mailed me to bash me instead of clogging up every thread with your rants about me. I can provide you my e-mail that way the rest of the forum doesn’t have to constantly get sidetracked every time I post because you have to follow me up by saying you got me.[/quote]
I understand how you could have gotten confused when you were a little tyke.
Liberal is very close to the word Libertarian.
But…I think it’s time that you understood the difference sport. Halloween is over stop pretending.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
LOL Teddy was no conservative. And there’s no such thing as a “progressive” conservative. It’s a contradiction of terms.[/quote]
“Defenders of the short-sighted men who in their greed and selfishness will, if permitted, rob our country of half its charm by their reckless extermination of all useful and beautiful wild things sometimes seek to champion them by saying the ‘the game belongs to the people.’ So it does; and not merely to the people now alive, but to the unborn people. The ‘greatest good for the greatest number’ applies to the number within the womb of time, compared to which those now alive form but an insignificant fraction. Our duty to the whole, including the unborn generations, bids us restrain an unprincipled present-day minority from wasting the heritage of these unborn generations. The movement for the conservation of wild life and the larger movement for the conservation of all our natural resources are essentially democratic in spirit, purpose, and method”
and
“The conservation of natural resources is the fundamental problem. Unless we solve that problem it will avail us little to solve all others.”
He spent a lot of time in the outdoors so he would have a vested interest in protecting it.
And he was a founder of the Progressive Party. Hard to say that he wasn’t a Progressive.
“Defenders of the short-sighted men who in their greed and selfishness will, if permitted, rob our country of half its charm by their reckless extermination of all useful and beautiful wild things sometimes seek to champion them by saying the ‘the game belongs to the people.’ So it does; and not merely to the people now alive, but to the unborn people. The ‘greatest good for the greatest number’ applies to the number within the womb of time, compared to which those now alive form but an insignificant fraction. Our duty to the whole, including the unborn generations, bids us restrain an unprincipled present-day minority from wasting the heritage of these unborn generations. The movement for the conservation of wild life and the larger movement for the conservation of all our natural resources are essentially democratic in spirit, purpose, and method”[/quote]
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
LOL Teddy was no conservative. And there’s no such thing as a “progressive” conservative. It’s a contradiction of terms.[/quote]
“Defenders of the short-sighted men who in their greed and selfishness will, if permitted, rob our country of half its charm by their reckless extermination of all useful and beautiful wild things sometimes seek to champion them by saying the ‘the game belongs to the people.’ So it does; and not merely to the people now alive, but to the unborn people. The ‘greatest good for the greatest number’ applies to the number within the womb of time, compared to which those now alive form but an insignificant fraction. Our duty to the whole, including the unborn generations, bids us restrain an unprincipled present-day minority from wasting the heritage of these unborn generations. The movement for the conservation of wild life and the larger movement for the conservation of all our natural resources are essentially democratic in spirit, purpose, and method”
and
“The conservation of natural resources is the fundamental problem. Unless we solve that problem it will avail us little to solve all others.”
He spent a lot of time in the outdoors so he would have a vested interest in protecting it.
And he was a founder of the Progressive Party. Hard to say that he wasn’t a Progressive.
james
[/quote]
I assumed you meant ‘conservative’ not ‘conservationist.’
