Streetfighting How To?

[quote]WhiteCrow wrote:
Hey guys!

I have a question, although an embarassing one. I have been in some fights in my life.
Most of them were stupid bar fights. Just like last saturday. We were at a party and
I accidentally bumped into a dude. He immediatly pushed me away, HARD. I pushed him back.

Then he stands there taunting me, like “c’mon, I’m right here”. Then I am going over it in
my mind:

“I am probably stronger than him. But wait, he might do MMA or some shit, and I have no fighting experience. Shall I go for it? Shit, if I cant knock him out, it will be a mess. What if he knocks me out? Etc”.

Basically, I have no fighting experience, nor would I know where to start. Swing for his jaw? His throat? Side of his neck?

How would you (experienced) guys handle one to one combat.

P.S I am not asking to pick fights with people, but to just have (train?) for reassurance that I can hold my own agains most people.

Thanks in advance[/quote]

Go to a gunstore buy a gun. Or buy a stolen one from a drugdealer. Next time some fool steps pull it out and pistol whip the dude. No ones gonna talk shit or even think about swinging with a gun in their face. Avoid physical confrontation without looking like a pussy. Sounds like a win to me.

[quote]cycobushmaster wrote:
side note ot this whole discussion…

today at work we had DT training… one, we went over the Force Science Research (look into it if you’re interested) about people remembering jack shit if they fought for 1 min or more…incidententally, most people can’t fight all-out for over 1 minute.

two, we did a drill where tow of our instructors tried to take your gun. one of my friends (who’s prolly 110 lbs and looks uncomfortably like Courtney Cox) soccer kicked an instructor in the balls (and he wans’t pissed because it was the right thing to do), and one other officer “head-hunted” the offenders, which was clearly un-nerving to them. being defensive is okay, but being offensive puts you in the situation to win. the point being, if you’re not in a legally correct situation, then you might not really “win.”

mind set is a huge deal when it comes to fighting. most street thugs will do some serious bullshit, because they don’t care if they go to jail. regular people have problems with that mindset.[/quote]

Cyco, what do you mean when you say the defender “head hunted” his attackers?

[quote]joutmez wrote:

[quote]WhiteCrow wrote:
Hey guys!

I have a question, although an embarassing one. I have been in some fights in my life.
Most of them were stupid bar fights. Just like last saturday. We were at a party and
I accidentally bumped into a dude. He immediatly pushed me away, HARD. I pushed him back.

Then he stands there taunting me, like “c’mon, I’m right here”. Then I am going over it in
my mind:

“I am probably stronger than him. But wait, he might do MMA or some shit, and I have no fighting experience. Shall I go for it? Shit, if I cant knock him out, it will be a mess. What if he knocks me out? Etc”.

Basically, I have no fighting experience, nor would I know where to start. Swing for his jaw? His throat? Side of his neck?

How would you (experienced) guys handle one to one combat.

P.S I am not asking to pick fights with people, but to just have (train?) for reassurance that I can hold my own agains most people.

Thanks in advance[/quote]

Go to a gunstore buy a gun. Or buy a stolen one from a drugdealer. Next time some fool steps pull it out and pistol whip the dude. No ones gonna talk shit or even think about swinging with a gun in their face. Avoid physical confrontation without looking like a pussy. Sounds like a win to me.[/quote]

You don’t want to look like a target, but on the flip-side, you don’t want to be posturing and look like your looking for trouble.

Didnt get a chance to read through all of the responses so apologies if I might be repeating something but here is what I learned from my very limited experience in fights and somewhat limited experience doing self defence stuff.

1 - Avoid places where you think shit might start, that means if you walk into some dive bar and it’s 80% men…get out. A lot of times you can just feel tension in the air…if you feel that get out. I have basically stopped going out to bars because of this but so much the better. I used to live in Australia and it’s a surprisingly aggressive place. Now in Holland and everyone much more chilled out.

2 - If you knock over someones beer or bump in to them…apologise, offer to buy them a beer…5 dollars or however much it costs surely costs less than your life, your health or if you are a star fighter, someone else’s life or health. I have done it before ( the beer buying strategy) and simply said to the guy we can either fight and one of us will be much worse off or we can just keep drinking beer.

3 - If the other dude is very aggresive, apologise loudly but forcefully and keep eye contact all the time. A lot of these guys are bullies and if the get a whiff of weakness they will go for you. Have your hands up with open palms but in a position where you can defend your face. Also open palms and apology will ensure witnesses back you up and say that you were backing away while the guy attacked first, this could be important later in court or with police.

4 - This sounds cowardly but unless some close to you is also involved and you have absolutely no choice but to stand and fight, it’s better to work on your 100m dash. Running fast is a pretty good form of self defence. I would rather run away than be hurt or hurt someone else if there is no other option. These days with knifes and guns involved it’s not a great idea getting into a fight.

5 - if there is no choice…well there are probably heaps of different ways to fight and I am not an expert in any of them probably the guys on this forum will have better advice. Hit hard, hit the face, balls or neck and then make a quick exit if possible, no need to be a hero and try to finish it off, especially if his mates are prowling around.

My 2c

LOL at the video, the dude with no top was clearly a wanker but not a thug. Even though he was posturing I doubt he was going to cause damage. Seems like the other guy hit first and then also went in to finish off. With that said and that kick at the end, it would be more likely that he gets sued for excessive force or assault. Should have just backed out of that one. But clearly he had to prove he was da man

Oh and I forgot to add…

All the stuff you read will immediately disappear from your head as soon as you are in a confrontational situation, once the adrenaline fight or flight shit kicks in, youll have tunnel vision and won’t be making great decisions, your fine motor skills also decrease.

If you really want to learn, pick someone who teaches self defense in a smart way, that should mean they teach 80% situational on how to diffuse a situation, drilling stuff like guys verbally abusing you and pushing you around. And 20% on how to actually fight. The hardest thing is to learn how to control the adrenaline dump at the very start.

[quote]Miss Parker wrote:

[quote]cycobushmaster wrote:
side note ot this whole discussion…

today at work we had DT training… one, we went over the Force Science Research (look into it if you’re interested) about people remembering jack shit if they fought for 1 min or more…incidententally, most people can’t fight all-out for over 1 minute.

two, we did a drill where tow of our instructors tried to take your gun. one of my friends (who’s prolly 110 lbs and looks uncomfortably like Courtney Cox) soccer kicked an instructor in the balls (and he wans’t pissed because it was the right thing to do), and one other officer “head-hunted” the offenders, which was clearly un-nerving to them. being defensive is okay, but being offensive puts you in the situation to win. the point being, if you’re not in a legally correct situation, then you might not really “win.”

mind set is a huge deal when it comes to fighting. most street thugs will do some serious bullshit, because they don’t care if they go to jail. regular people have problems with that mindset.[/quote]

Cyco, what do you mean when you say the defender “head hunted” his attackers?

[/quote]

Miss P,

when we did the rill, most people just defended by moving, sprawling, etc for a minute or so and then the drill trnsitioned to something else. this one guy i mentioned actively went for the KO and takedowns on the “attackers”… not just protecting his gun, but chasing them down with the intent to end it. in watching the drill, i realized that’s an issue that LEO training has a weakness right now. we have to testify that we were “in fear of our life” but training defensivly is not neccessarily the best way to counter threats. i suspect in KM you train offensively instead of defensively, but i could be worng…

Since I keep reading the thread and see some great comments I should add…

If your woman is involved…unless she is crazy and one of those that mouths off to get you into a fight (in which case you should leave her) she will be completely disgusted by aggressive behaviour, it does not make a man more attractive, just more like a fool and a beast even if he completely annihilates the other person. Remember everyone will forget who started the fight and will have much more sympathy for the dude with the broken skull even if he was the one that started it.

So I guess the bottom line is…don’t get into fights. I think that 99% of the time fights are avoidable. Pick the right places to go out, if there is not a right place, don’t go out.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]GorillaMon wrote:
95%+ of the time you should calmly seek to de-fuse the situation as best as you can & walk away.

I’d also say, with regards ‘pushing him back’ DO NOT EVER DO THIS!!! Pushing some neanderthal ‘hard in the chest’ in this type of scenario is almost always a fighting preamble/violence escalator.

In many ways, if you feel as sure as you can be that you are physically stronger than him (though, you aren’t in anyway a trained fighter) it may have been better to actually push him OVER. Send the mother fucker flying & get the hell out of there. The moment you start swinging OR ‘pseudo’-pushing some guy in the chest (in the same manner a drunken teenager might ‘snap’ punch a roadsign to show off in front of his mates) you are basically asking fot trouble.

Push & run if you really have to.

The rest of the time, be cool & remind yourself: Everytime I succesfully circumnavigate this kind of madness, I become 10% stronger!!! Aggression is usually fear masquerading as strength.
[/quote]

Pushing is goofy and worthless and it’s a sign of the untrained. I used to do this when I was a kid, we all used to.

But the formula normally goes one pushes, other pushes back, first guy swings. Well, if I’m getting pushed, you’re getting a verbal warning, and if you move forward a second time, I’m going to hit you.

Now you’re coming at me, and as long as I don’t stomp your head in once I kayo you, I’m probably not going to have a hard time claiming self-defense, especially in combination with the warning and having my hands out in front of me.

A good example is this video, which I posted before. If the dude had just let this guy go once he hits the ground, he would probably be able to claim self-defense and not get crucified. The boot to the ribs, of course, nullifies all that…

[/quote]

Chuckles at ‘goofy’ pushing.

Dude, from an untrained, non-fighters POV, (assuming you are not attempting to push someone over who is much bigger & stronger than you) pushing is a much more efficient means of flawing an aggressor than risking trading blows, going for one big knock out punch etc.

Also, from an legal POV, imagine explaining how you knocked out some guy with one punch because he came at you Vs merely pushing him over & getting out of there. A push OR punch could still do a lot of damage, though any form of heavy punching, kicking etc tends to be seen as more violent (especially if the blows are delivered straight to the head etc).

All forms of self-defence have their place dude.

[quote]GorillaMon wrote:

Dude, from an untrained, non-fighters POV, (assuming you are not attempting to push someone over who is much bigger & stronger than you) pushing is a much more efficient means of flawing an aggressor than risking trading blows, going for one big knock out punch etc.
[/quote]

No, it isn’t. It’s totally pointless. You go to shove someone and you’re immediately off balance, meaning that a sidestep combined with a mild pull on one your outstretched arms puts you on the ground.

And if you “land” your push, what is accomplished? Absolutely nothing. Now, you’re as much the aggressor as he is, and you’re playing directly into what Rory Miller calls the “Monkey Dance,” which is the standard format for trying to prove social dominance.

Now, if you’re physically retreating, hands outstretched, after being shoved once, and you’re warning the guy to “Stay back, I don’t want to fight,” and he comes at you again with the same ill intent, the odds are is that you’re going to be legally safe in hitting him.

You do not have to be swung at first to defend yourself, and if people see you doing all of this, you’re going to have a much better shot at calling it “Self defense” especially if you land your shots, put him down, and then stop attacking.

The second you push back, you’re becoming as much the aggressor as he. And for no benefit either, because a push isn’t going to stop the attacker- it’s simply going to incite him by playing into the Monkey Dance.

“Pushing him over?” What kind of pansy ass homos do you think get into streetfights?

The chances of you “pushing him over” and being able to run away are slim to none, unless you get very, very lucky and the dude catches his foot on a curb or some shit.

It does no damage, and incites more anger and violence.

A punch is an effective, preemptive strike if someone is coming at you though, and the odds of it being legally justified are decent if you’re using it in the right context.

As shown in that video, this dude has taken his shirt off, he’s making threatening displays, he’s verbally threatening the guy, and he’s pushed him. When he comes forward the last time, the guy clocks him.

He’s probably reasonably safe at that point as far as the law.

[quote]
All forms of self-defence have their place dude. [/quote]

What the fuck are you talking about? All forms? Huh?

[quote]cycobushmaster wrote:

[quote]Miss Parker wrote:

[quote]cycobushmaster wrote:
side note ot this whole discussion…

today at work we had DT training… one, we went over the Force Science Research (look into it if you’re interested) about people remembering jack shit if they fought for 1 min or more…incidententally, most people can’t fight all-out for over 1 minute.

two, we did a drill where tow of our instructors tried to take your gun. one of my friends (who’s prolly 110 lbs and looks uncomfortably like Courtney Cox) soccer kicked an instructor in the balls (and he wans’t pissed because it was the right thing to do), and one other officer “head-hunted” the offenders, which was clearly un-nerving to them. being defensive is okay, but being offensive puts you in the situation to win. the point being, if you’re not in a legally correct situation, then you might not really “win.”

mind set is a huge deal when it comes to fighting. most street thugs will do some serious bullshit, because they don’t care if they go to jail. regular people have problems with that mindset.[/quote]

Cyco, what do you mean when you say the defender “head hunted” his attackers?

[/quote]

Miss P,

when we did the rill, most people just defended by moving, sprawling, etc for a minute or so and then the drill trnsitioned to something else. this one guy i mentioned actively went for the KO and takedowns on the “attackers”… not just protecting his gun, but chasing them down with the intent to end it. in watching the drill, i realized that’s an issue that LEO training has a weakness right now. we have to testify that we were “in fear of our life” but training defensivly is not neccessarily the best way to counter threats. i suspect in KM you train offensively instead of defensively, but i could be worng…[/quote]

Oh, ha, I thought headhunting might be some cool drill or techique I could try. We really train both offensively & defensively when weapons are involved. You were training retain your weapon, at my (low) level I’m working on taking away an attacker’s weapon & turning it on him, then deciding if I’m forced to use it against him. I’ve gotten in trouble a couple of times for taking a knife and then automatically stabbing or slicing the attacker’s throat with it.

If an officer is in fear for his life, it would make sense (to me, anyway) that he would neutralize the possibility of further attacks by “headhunting” the bad guy until backup arrives. But I guess the legalities have a lot to do with the community. Austin is in Travis County, very liberal…a guy was recently given probation for cutting a cop’s throat. I’m not kidding. The cop lived, which I’m sure affected the outcome, but now that nutjob is out walking around. Williamson County, adjacent to ours will hang you for looking cross-eyed at a police officer or anybody else.

This vid seems to be security guards in russia versus some thugs but I think it’s a good example of the hidden variables in a real fight. You never know how many buddies of the dude you are going to fight are having a drink at the bar, etc etc. It is also eyeopening just how brutal a real streetfight is.Also in fairness some of these guys seem to have pretty good standup skills.Theyre so damn aggresive.Thoughts?

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]GorillaMon wrote:

Dude, from an untrained, non-fighters POV, (assuming you are not attempting to push someone over who is much bigger & stronger than you) pushing is a much more efficient means of flawing an aggressor than risking trading blows, going for one big knock out punch etc.
[/quote]

No, it isn’t. It’s totally pointless. You go to shove someone and you’re immediately off balance, meaning that a sidestep combined with a mild pull on one your outstretched arms puts you on the ground.

And if you “land” your push, what is accomplished? Absolutely nothing. Now, you’re as much the aggressor as he is, and you’re playing directly into what Rory Miller calls the “Monkey Dance,” which is the standard format for trying to prove social dominance.

Now, if you’re physically retreating, hands outstretched, after being shoved once, and you’re warning the guy to “Stay back, I don’t want to fight,” and he comes at you again with the same ill intent, the odds are is that you’re going to be legally safe in hitting him.

You do not have to be swung at first to defend yourself, and if people see you doing all of this, you’re going to have a much better shot at calling it “Self defense” especially if you land your shots, put him down, and then stop attacking.

The second you push back, you’re becoming as much the aggressor as he. And for no benefit either, because a push isn’t going to stop the attacker- it’s simply going to incite him by playing into the Monkey Dance.

“Pushing him over?” What kind of pansy ass homos do you think get into streetfights?

The chances of you “pushing him over” and being able to run away are slim to none, unless you get very, very lucky and the dude catches his foot on a curb or some shit.

It does no damage, and incites more anger and violence.

A punch is an effective, preemptive strike if someone is coming at you though, and the odds of it being legally justified are decent if you’re using it in the right context.

As shown in that video, this dude has taken his shirt off, he’s making threatening displays, he’s verbally threatening the guy, and he’s pushed him. When he comes forward the last time, the guy clocks him.

He’s probably reasonably safe at that point as far as the law.

[quote]
All forms of self-defence have their place dude. [/quote]

What the fuck are you talking about? All forms? Huh?[/quote]

Shrugs Dude, my POV probably is biased in that I’m nearly 6ft 6 & around 270ILBS, so, for me pushing someone over is relatively easy.

You seem to be looking at this more from the POV of people that really know how to fight as opposed to your average chump that fancies a punch-up because of some ridiculous, minor social injustice he believes he’s suffrered. Most well trained fighters NEVER get into these kind of jams in the first place.

Perhaps, you should go back to your original post & re-consider your position on this. You’ve gone from sounding like a level-headed guy to sounding like the kind of fool that is actually secretly itching to go pop some fool in the face for their unwarranted belligerent.

Boxers can go round after round, after round & NOT knock each other down with attempted & landed punches.

Much easier to land a solid push than a solid punch. Like I said before, ‘pseudo’ pushing is pretty much never a good idea. Actually pushing someone over is a rather different story.

It might sound ‘pansy ass’ to you, but it works <<Which, is ultimately all that matters.

[quote]GorillaMon wrote:

Shrugs Dude, my POV probably is biased in that I’m nearly 6ft 6 & around 270ILBS, so, for me pushing someone over is relatively easy.
[/quote]

It’s definitely biased by that.

I’m looking at it from my point of view. That’s it.

Maybe you should go back to your previous post and consider that although “pushing” might “work” for someone of your size, it’s not going to do shit for the majority of the population, and regardless of that, you STILL become part of the problem once you begin pushing. Good luck claiming self defense at that point.

Ah… GLOVES?

Seriously?

[quote]
Much easier to land a solid push than a solid punch. Like I said before, ‘pseudo’ pushing is pretty much never a good idea. Actually pushing someone over is a rather different story.

It might sound ‘pansy ass’ to you, but it works <<Which, is ultimately all that matters. [/quote]

I don’t think you have any idea what you’re talking about. Just my humble opinion.

“Pushes” don’t do shit unless you’re a huge guy. If you are, congrats. Good for you. That’s meaningless and worthless advice for 90 percent of the population though.

In regards to pushing, obviously size is going to make a difference (a 100 lb woman is not going to send a 300 lb man flying backwards through the air with a push), but there are methods of pushing which most average sized men could make work effectively on other average sized men (even if they were larger).

We have a technique which we call an “impact push” (which we actually use to teach people proper body positioning for throwing straight line punches) which generates a tremendous amount of linear force (especially if you add footwork and body lean into it), can be launched fairly non telegraphically from a “I don’t want any problems” position, and when executed correctly can allow even smaller individuals to literally launch larger people backwards. Because of the “impact” aspect, it can also act much like a double palm smash to the torso so it can knock the wind out of someone as well as push them over.

Environmental factors would also play a significant role. Maybe if you and your would be attacker are in the middle of an abandoned parking lot they might just get thrown backwards and not actually fall over. But, if you can position them so that there is some sort of low line obstacle behind them (bench, curb, front end of a car, low wall, etc…), there is a much higher chance that they will trip over this obstacle and wind up going down. Hopefully giving you enough of a head start to be able to flee the scene.

I agree though that once you engage with such a technique, the fight is on. So, I would recommend trying to use verbal and postural self defense tactics to try to never let it become physical or escalate. None the less, a push could be a very effective tool to gain distance and escape should it become clear that physical violence is unavoidable.

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
In regards to pushing, obviously size is going to make a difference (a 100 lb woman is not going to send a 300 lb man flying backwards through the air with a push), but there are methods of pushing which most average sized men could make work effectively on other average sized men (even if they were larger).

We have a technique which we call an “impact push” (which we actually use to teach people proper body positioning for throwing straight line punches) which generates a tremendous amount of linear force (especially if you add footwork and body lean into it), can be launched fairly non telegraphically from a “I don’t want any problems” position, and when executed correctly can allow even smaller individuals to literally launch larger people backwards. Because of the “impact” aspect, it can also act much like a double palm smash to the torso so it can knock the wind out of someone as well as push them over.

Environmental factors would also play a significant role. Maybe if you and your would be attacker are in the middle of an abandoned parking lot they might just get thrown backwards and not actually fall over. But, if you can position them so that there is some sort of low line obstacle behind them (bench, curb, front end of a car, low wall, etc…), there is a much higher chance that they will trip over this obstacle and wind up going down. Hopefully giving you enough of a head start to be able to flee the scene.

I agree though that once you engage with such a technique, the fight is on. So, I would recommend trying to use verbal and postural self defense tactics to try to never let it become physical or escalate. None the less, a push could be a very effective tool to gain distance and escape should it become clear that physical violence is unavoidable.[/quote]

While I don’t necessarily disagree with the premise of this, if I’m going to get in that deep and make an aggressive move, I’m gonna hit the fucker.

I’m 5’7" man, I don’t have time to fuck around trying to push some dude when I know that I pop him twice and he’s goin down and I can bug out.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
In regards to pushing, obviously size is going to make a difference (a 100 lb woman is not going to send a 300 lb man flying backwards through the air with a push), but there are methods of pushing which most average sized men could make work effectively on other average sized men (even if they were larger).

We have a technique which we call an “impact push” (which we actually use to teach people proper body positioning for throwing straight line punches) which generates a tremendous amount of linear force (especially if you add footwork and body lean into it), can be launched fairly non telegraphically from a “I don’t want any problems” position, and when executed correctly can allow even smaller individuals to literally launch larger people backwards. Because of the “impact” aspect, it can also act much like a double palm smash to the torso so it can knock the wind out of someone as well as push them over.

Environmental factors would also play a significant role. Maybe if you and your would be attacker are in the middle of an abandoned parking lot they might just get thrown backwards and not actually fall over. But, if you can position them so that there is some sort of low line obstacle behind them (bench, curb, front end of a car, low wall, etc…), there is a much higher chance that they will trip over this obstacle and wind up going down. Hopefully giving you enough of a head start to be able to flee the scene.

I agree though that once you engage with such a technique, the fight is on. So, I would recommend trying to use verbal and postural self defense tactics to try to never let it become physical or escalate. None the less, a push could be a very effective tool to gain distance and escape should it become clear that physical violence is unavoidable.[/quote]

While I don’t necessarily disagree with the premise of this, if I’m going to get in that deep and make an aggressive move, I’m gonna hit the fucker.

I’m 5’7" man, I don’t have time to fuck around trying to push some dude when I know that I pop him twice and he’s goin down and I can bug out. [/quote]

I’m definitely not saying that punching is a poor choice. Just saying that if you know how to do it, a good push can be pretty effective too. And at 5’7" you’re easily big enough to make an “impact push” work, unless maybe you were fighting some huge 300 lb defensive lineman (in which case your punches might be equally as ineffective).

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
In regards to pushing, obviously size is going to make a difference (a 100 lb woman is not going to send a 300 lb man flying backwards through the air with a push), but there are methods of pushing which most average sized men could make work effectively on other average sized men (even if they were larger).

We have a technique which we call an “impact push” (which we actually use to teach people proper body positioning for throwing straight line punches) which generates a tremendous amount of linear force (especially if you add footwork and body lean into it), can be launched fairly non telegraphically from a “I don’t want any problems” position, and when executed correctly can allow even smaller individuals to literally launch larger people backwards. Because of the “impact” aspect, it can also act much like a double palm smash to the torso so it can knock the wind out of someone as well as push them over.

Environmental factors would also play a significant role. Maybe if you and your would be attacker are in the middle of an abandoned parking lot they might just get thrown backwards and not actually fall over. But, if you can position them so that there is some sort of low line obstacle behind them (bench, curb, front end of a car, low wall, etc…), there is a much higher chance that they will trip over this obstacle and wind up going down. Hopefully giving you enough of a head start to be able to flee the scene.

I agree though that once you engage with such a technique, the fight is on. So, I would recommend trying to use verbal and postural self defense tactics to try to never let it become physical or escalate. None the less, a push could be a very effective tool to gain distance and escape should it become clear that physical violence is unavoidable.[/quote]

While I don’t necessarily disagree with the premise of this, if I’m going to get in that deep and make an aggressive move, I’m gonna hit the fucker.

I’m 5’7" man, I don’t have time to fuck around trying to push some dude when I know that I pop him twice and he’s goin down and I can bug out. [/quote]

I’m definitely not saying that punching is a poor choice. Just saying that if you know how to do it, a good push can be pretty effective too. And at 5’7" you’re easily big enough to make an “impact push” work, unless maybe you were fighting some huge 300 lb defensive lineman (in which case your punches might be equally as ineffective).[/quote]

I may be having trouble tracking this discussion. I think think FightinIrish and Sentoguy are talking about different things.

It seemed to me that GorillaMon was espousing basically to push harder and posture bigger as a way of handling these things (the I push you, you push me, we jaw at each other, ok now everyone sees that we are tough, push some more, someone throws a punch…). Am I correct?
Basically the answer to a push is, fuck it shove 'em back. Basically what the OP did, but try to be big and strong about it. That is what I thought Irish was railing against, and I am on that page. Or was that not what GorillaMon meant?

I am reading what Sento wrote about using a push, or in this case an “impact push” (which I think is what I might term a drive, basically using a “drop step” to slam your structure into someone at an angle to disrupt their balance and also hurt/injure) to take away someones balance as part of the “fights on”. I am getting this from his mention of using the environment, his likening it to a double palm strike, and his referrance to straight punch mechanics. Am I correct here Sentoguy? This push isn’t a prove your strong thing? It is an assault on someone’s balance, and hence an attack on their ability to be effective with offense or defense? Now, perhaps I am reading too much of my own opinion in your post, but I think I am also agreeing with you. I might go further and say, depending on what you push someone into (traffic, a building, a store front window, any hard object that hits their head, ect.), or off of (tops of hills, tops of stairs, ect.) as push/shove/drive may be the most damaging thing you can do at the moment.

An illustration

So, am I following any of this correctly, or am I too coffee deficient to understand? (Could be both.)

Regards,

Robert A

Regarding pushing - It’s been my observation that if you put most untrained, or moderately trained people into a simulation type training scenario where the aggressor advances directly toward them, faster than they can retreat, arms splayed and mouthing off - typical posturing BS - the palm strike/shove to center chest seems to be the stress reaction “default” setting for the vast majority of people. It is generally not terribly effective the way that most people deliver it, particularly if they are at a size/mass disadvantage. Nonetheless most people go to that first. IMO This is different from either the “Monkey Dance” or the “impact push” mentioned above, although performed well I imagine it more resembles the latter. Most people will attempt to create distance when threatened, in order to allow their eyes to take in as much information as possible and allow their brains to assess as many options as possible before they will throw down. I realize that some of us are wired differently than that, but most people aren’t. IMO this is part of the reason bad guys often win “fights”.

Even people trained in more efficient techniques will generally default to this when pressed in an unexpected manner (i.e. not a repetitive drill where you know what’s coming and deliver a predetermined response). Shoving to establish social dominance IS goofy but this is more of a primal, protective reflex IMO. FTR, I believe that the OP is describing social dominance type pushing, I just find this other thing interesting because it seems to be so universal.

[quote]Robert A wrote:

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
In regards to pushing, obviously size is going to make a difference (a 100 lb woman is not going to send a 300 lb man flying backwards through the air with a push), but there are methods of pushing which most average sized men could make work effectively on other average sized men (even if they were larger).

We have a technique which we call an “impact push” (which we actually use to teach people proper body positioning for throwing straight line punches) which generates a tremendous amount of linear force (especially if you add footwork and body lean into it), can be launched fairly non telegraphically from a “I don’t want any problems” position, and when executed correctly can allow even smaller individuals to literally launch larger people backwards. Because of the “impact” aspect, it can also act much like a double palm smash to the torso so it can knock the wind out of someone as well as push them over.

Environmental factors would also play a significant role. Maybe if you and your would be attacker are in the middle of an abandoned parking lot they might just get thrown backwards and not actually fall over. But, if you can position them so that there is some sort of low line obstacle behind them (bench, curb, front end of a car, low wall, etc…), there is a much higher chance that they will trip over this obstacle and wind up going down. Hopefully giving you enough of a head start to be able to flee the scene.

I agree though that once you engage with such a technique, the fight is on. So, I would recommend trying to use verbal and postural self defense tactics to try to never let it become physical or escalate. None the less, a push could be a very effective tool to gain distance and escape should it become clear that physical violence is unavoidable.[/quote]

While I don’t necessarily disagree with the premise of this, if I’m going to get in that deep and make an aggressive move, I’m gonna hit the fucker.

I’m 5’7" man, I don’t have time to fuck around trying to push some dude when I know that I pop him twice and he’s goin down and I can bug out. [/quote]

I’m definitely not saying that punching is a poor choice. Just saying that if you know how to do it, a good push can be pretty effective too. And at 5’7" you’re easily big enough to make an “impact push” work, unless maybe you were fighting some huge 300 lb defensive lineman (in which case your punches might be equally as ineffective).[/quote]

I may be having trouble tracking this discussion. I think think FightinIrish and Sentoguy are talking about different things.

It seemed to me that GorillaMon was espousing basically to push harder and posture bigger as a way of handling these things (the I push you, you push me, we jaw at each other, ok now everyone sees that we are tough, push some more, someone throws a punch…). Am I correct?
Basically the answer to a push is, fuck it shove 'em back. Basically what the OP did, but try to be big and strong about it. That is what I thought Irish was railing against, and I am on that page. Or was that not what GorillaMon meant?

I am reading what Sento wrote about using a push, or in this case an “impact push” (which I think is what I might term a drive, basically using a “drop step” to slam your structure into someone at an angle to disrupt their balance and also hurt/injure) to take away someones balance as part of the “fights on”. I am getting this from his mention of using the environment, his likening it to a double palm strike, and his referrance to straight punch mechanics. Am I correct here Sentoguy? This push isn’t a prove your strong thing? It is an assault on someone’s balance, and hence an attack on their ability to be effective with offense or defense? Now, perhaps I am reading too much of my own opinion in your post, but I think I am also agreeing with you. I might go further and say, depending on what you push someone into (traffic, a building, a store front window, any hard object that hits their head, ect.), or off of (tops of hills, tops of stairs, ect.) as push/shove/drive may be the most damaging thing you can do at the moment.

So, am I following any of this correctly, or am I too coffee deficient to understand? (Could be both.)

Regards,

Robert A[/quote]

Yeah, you’re pretty much getting what I am saying. This is not a “who’s tougher” type of back and forth pushing like you see so many fights start with. This is an “ok, you’ve expressed the ability, intent, and means to do me personal harm, have ignored my attempts to try to talk you out of fighting, and I now want to put space between us, possibly do damage to you, and hopefully disable your ability to launch an offense or pursue me should I flee” attack.

And yes, the stakes/level of force could be raised substantially depending on what you pushed someone into (moving traffic, down stairs, or through a plate glass window could be potentially fatal). In most cases though, that would probably be seen as excessive force. Just pushing them back, hopefully over something, and possibly knocking the wind out of them in order to buy space/time to flee the scene would be a better choice in lower force situations.