I came across this steroid compound comparison chart online and im wondering if this info is accurate?
1 Like
Drugs/compounds effect everyone differently- from the side effects you’re looking for(good)….to the negative side affects you don’t want(bad). So as long as you realize that….then this is likely an “ok” chart / starting point
Of course, that is the case for every drug, but everyone can agree that mast causes hairloss and dbol causes water retention regardless of the individual, i was more asking about the ratings for the compounds
Hmm, I don’t think everyone can agree that they absolutely cause these side effects.
We can all agree that those are common side effects associated with those compounds. Just not absolute. Many variables at play (dosages / other compounds being used / BF% / etc etc).
Some can take masteron and primobolan and it does not affect hair. Some lose hair on anavar alone.
Arnold and those dudes from the 60/70s used a lot of dbol. Didn’t look like they had too much water retention….Albeit they were extremely lean / low BF% .and likely used much smaller dosages then you see today.
Also, most drugs are probably being taken in conjunction with Testosterone today (likely at high dosages). What role does that play with side effects?
The rankings you see on the chart are not absolute. It’s a relative good ballpark to determine the right tool for the right job. Bu, ranking masteron a 9 for cutting is likely wrong…. It’s a great drug if you’re already cut. Similar to primobolan.
From 1971 through 1976 the ONLY AAS that I used was Dianabol (by CIBA). The most I took were 8 week cycles of 15mg/day. I competed in bodybuilding those years. Water retention was easily addressed with a reasonable minimization of sodium intake.
Thank you for providing more weight to my argument!
Nowadays for whatever reason… “you need to start at least 50mg dbol a day”. Wonder why the negative side effects are so bad?
Drugs work. 15mg of UGL Methandienone is the same as 15mg of pharmaceutical Methandienone. This is not a valid reason for the insane dosages you see today. I don’t remotely believe that is the point you were trying to make …but I wanted tosquash any argument that pharma stuff is “more effective”which is why dosages need to be higher now. Silly
Very cool you got to take the Ciba stuff!
I even bought a light blue T-shirt and wrote “CIBA” in magic marker on the front. It was one of my workout shirts when I was “on cycle.”
1 Like
I suppose if you knew nothing about most anabolics it’s a good starting point. A lot of it simply isn’t factual and if you asked 10 users their ratings on each drug you’d get different answers. Again though good starting point or basis.
1 Like
Yeah i was expecting tren to have a higher mass score but i have never used it so wouldnt know, would be good to get an actual updated accurate chart like thia
1 Like