Bwahahahahaha!!!
Total garbage POV. Reading your posts is like listening to Rush Limbaugh.
To end it but the politicians will cry there is no money for it, all the while they send billions off shore to fund a war. MMT used for evil. The Congress has the power of the purse. If the votes are there, the issue gets funded.
So donāt try. Is that your solution?
Unfortunately Iām relegated to voting as an action point here. Itās not a high enough priority for me to go out campaigning/fundraising/protesting et cetera.
And my vote goes to whichever relevant candidate is proposing to slash or at least slow entitlement programs among other things. This is how voting works, fyi.
1 Like
Such as wars?
Ask not what your country can do for youā¦
Are we throwing darts now? I was glad to see an end to war in addition to peace keeping diplomacyā¦ā¦
Iām not sure what youāre mad at but go yell at the clouds or something.
No, just seeing if youāre as pissed at war spending as you are social programs. A lot of people say they are but are only vocal about being against social programs.
Trump is way more punk than him.
1 Like
Heās more gangster too, more of a man and more of everything except musician and once-relevant contrarian.
Beavis and Buttheadās social commentary was a lot more sophisticated than Mike Judge ever got credit for. He perfectly explains punk rock through the character of Butthead in two simple words in the first 10 seconds of a Rancid video.
1 Like
Heās a relevant contrarian! And willing to take action instead of complain.
The thing about musicians that think their job is to complain about stuff is that if you did what they suggest, theyād be the first to go.
They donāt realize that how lucky they are that their audience is a bunch of lazy middle & upper middle class future thems.
Conservatives are the new punksā¦ liberals and leftists are big state ābootlickersā their favorite termā¦ the most annoying thing about those rejects is their complete lack of self-awareness
3 Likes
Object to whatā¦be specific
I didnāt bother to look up your previous comment so Iām guessing here. Your objection to spending on social programs vs. war.
Yeah I donāt know. I like steak when it fits my needs but I hate kale.
War is a social program.
Depends on the warā¦yes means i have no issue with government spending on the following examples
WWIIā¦yes
Korean Warā¦no
Vietnam Warā¦no
Iraq warā¦no
depends on the social programā¦yes means i have no issue with goverment spending on the following examples
special needs or handicap fundingā¦yes
Artsā¦no
Subsidies for businessesā¦no
college payoffā¦no
Yeah for the defense contractors. Any wonder why we are involved in so many conflicts? But the difference between the military and social programs is often understood in separate contexts.
Collegeās are businesses that happen to teach classes on the side. They get special tax treatments.
And they shouldnāt, but i was talking about student loan payoffs