Stallone Busted in Airport!

Off Topic
121

[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:
mikren wrote:
Roy wrote:
The guy’s a movie star. Why the hell shouldn’t he use GH? He needs to get his old ass in shape as soon as possible for a movie, so he shoots up, who cares? Since when are movies drug tested anyways?

Because its performance enhancing. It will enable him to portray his role more effectively and therefore have a better chance at winning an Oscar, which is therefore unfair to all the other actors. He should be ineligible for a star on the Hollywood walk of fame and should have to pay restitution to other actors/actresses for the amount of lost revenue that people spent watching his unfair, roided up films instead of their flicks.

Hahahaha, please tell me you are joking…[/quote]

lol first time I ever heard anything like that before.

122

[quote]Damici wrote:
Plastic surgery and/or botox? Yes.

GH or androgen face? 'Fraid not.

Learn to differentiate. Again, see the Dick Cheney pics. :slight_smile:

Your lame dick cheney pics dont hold up as proof. THERE IS A BIG difference between a man aging when he is 20 and 50 with some slight larger ears and nose

vs. a mans face that had his entire BONE structure morph over the years like michael jackson.

FORHEAD=GH
JawLINE= heavy androgens
crazy weird veins = mostly GH
HUGE GH BELLY= GH.
Rambotox, machete, tiajuana plastic surgary = his fault
looking like he teams up with mickey rourke and shoot eacy other in the ass =priceless

123

[quote]jsbrook wrote:
Aging is one thing. I don’t want to get in war over whether Stallone’s is natural or not. But do those of you who’ve put on significant weight really look any different? Because I weigh 50 lbs more than I did at my skinniest and my face looks almost exactly the same.
[/quote]

You look much different than you did 30 years ago. That’s the point. These dick weeds are talking out of their collective asses if they think that facial features don’t change over time.

But they are convinced it is all because of drug use.

124

[quote]mikren wrote:
Roy wrote:
The guy’s a movie star. Why the hell shouldn’t he use GH? He needs to get his old ass in shape as soon as possible for a movie, so he shoots up, who cares? Since when are movies drug tested anyways?

Because its performance enhancing. It will enable him to portray his role more effectively and therefore have a better chance at winning an Oscar, which is therefore unfair to all the other actors. He should be ineligible for a star on the Hollywood walk of fame and should have to pay restitution to other actors/actresses for the amount of lost revenue that people spent watching his unfair, roided up films instead of their flicks.[/quote]

The new Rocky sucked. Quit crying. And Oscars are given for ACTING well, not looking good naked.

Besides, he looked like complete absolute 100% grade A shit in the new Rocky.

125

[quote]rainjack wrote:
jsbrook wrote:
Aging is one thing. I don’t want to get in war over whether Stallone’s is natural or not. But do those of you who’ve put on significant weight really look any different? Because I weigh 50 lbs more than I did at my skinniest and my face looks almost exactly the same.

You look much different than you did 30 years ago. That’s the point. These dick weeds are talking out of their collective asses if they think that facial features don’t change over time.

But they are convinced it is all because of drug use.

[/quote]

Has everyone forgotten just how ugly Stalone was BEFORE all of his “Brad Pitt ripped” movies?

GH isn’t the culprit, his parents are.

Or it could have been that accident that messed his voice up.

126

[quote]Roy wrote:

Has everyone forgotten just how ugly Stalone was BEFORE all of his “Brad Pitt ripped” movies?

GH isn’t the culprit, his parents are.

Or it could have been that accident that messed his voice up.
[/quote]

Finally! I was wondering when someone would mention that. Being good looking is something Stallone was never accused of. The plastic surgery hasn’t helped him either.

But, he did/does have a great physique, and I have enjoyed some of his movies.

127

[quote]christine wrote:
Roy wrote:

Has everyone forgotten just how ugly Stalone was BEFORE all of his “Brad Pitt ripped” movies?

GH isn’t the culprit, his parents are.

Or it could have been that accident that messed his voice up.

Finally! I was wondering when someone would mention that. Being good looking is something Stallone was never accused of. The plastic surgery hasn’t helped him either.

But, he did/does have a great physique, and I have enjoyed some of his movies.[/quote]

Bingo with a capital B - the nips and tucks are going to have way more affect than gh use. Hell - look at Kenny Rogers. Motherfucker can’t even blink.

How much gh is required to kill the blink reflex?

128


These were taken approximately a year a part. The one on the right was about a year ago.

The difference is about 45 lbs. I used a pro hormone during that time span but nothing else. TONS of people told me my face changed a lot. Mostly referring to my jawbone.

I made a thread about this a while back and most people agreed it was the masseter muscle growing.

129

[quote]lazyaxus11 wrote:
These were taken approximately a year a part. The one on the right was about a year ago.

The difference is about 45 lbs. I used a pro hormone during that time span but nothing else. TONS of people told me my face changed a lot. Mostly referring to my jawbone.

I made a thread about this a while back and most people agreed it was the masseter muscle growing. [/quote]

It looks somewhat different. How old are you? In college? The facial structure of many people changes in late teens and early twenties.

130

I was about to go back and add that in there. Im 19 so I would imagine Im just growing and changing naturally in that aspect as well.

131

[quote]CC wrote:
dez6485 wrote:
Wendler. he prob does roid.

Which makes the fact that you started this thread all the more amusing.

[/quote]

i can understand what youre saying, but youre drawing a correllation somewhere that you shouldnt.

i dont know a whole lot about Wendler, pretty minimal actually. That pic was in an article he wrote called “the yoke”. i just liked how massive and beast-like he looked. i wouldnt say stallone looks massive and beast-like at all. while i do admire his physique, there are more reasons that i like him than just that.

132

[quote]lazyaxus11 wrote:
These were taken approximately a year a part…[/quote]

Ummm…I guess you are smiling more in the second pic…but I figured that had more to do with the girl that your physical change seems to have fetched you than the physical change itself. Star pic, 'tis.

133

474×600 183 KB

click on the 3rd video down…

looks to be within the last 6 months…

looks Great to me…

http://www.filmspot.com/movie/361567/rocky-balboa/videos/index.html?

134

At first I thought he might have used GH because of his freakishly large forehead. (People with growth disorders caused by excessive GH production tend to have huge foreheads.) But looking at pics from the late 70s, it seems his forehead was always that big. (And finding pics at an angle where you can get a good look isn’t easy.)

Guess I was wrong.

135

[quote]christine wrote:
Roy wrote:

Has everyone forgotten just how ugly Stalone was BEFORE all of his “Brad Pitt ripped” movies?

GH isn’t the culprit, his parents are.

Or it could have been that accident that messed his voice up.

Finally! I was wondering when someone would mention that. Being good looking is something Stallone was never accused of. The plastic surgery hasn’t helped him either.

But, he did/does have a great physique, and I have enjoyed some of his movies.[/quote]

i think this can go either way. i know girls that think he is attractive, and i know girls that think hes not. for instance, i happened to catch a little “demolition man” the other day, with a girl that thought he looked “hot”.

i dont exactly go around asking people “stallone, hot or not?”…but clearly youre a female that doesnt find him attractive, and clearly this girl i was watching with did. so im just saying i think it could go either way.

i think if you took stallone from cliffhanger, demo man, movies like that- where hes actually in his mid-late 40’s, youll find more women saying that he looks good in them vs. maybe rocky 1-2, etc.

i do think he looks good, especially for being 60, but honestly demolition man isnt a movie i own, and i just randomly caught it on tv. i was surprised though at how young he looked, and then you do the math and he was like 46-47. even at that age, he was blowing away the other guys his age, so why not at 60?

136

[quote]dez6485 wrote:
Steel Nation wrote:
dez6485 wrote:
Slyfan wrote:
This one was taken about 5 minutes ago. I didn’t even realize how sickly I looked until now. What I find funny is people comparing pics of Sly from the 70’s to 2006-2007. I think he looks great. He’s 60 fucking years old! Let’s post other pics up here of 60 year olds, and then tell me how he looks.

i think its entirely possible that youre a huge tool.

evidence: your T-Nation name is “Slyfan”, and you took pics of yourself in front of a rocky poster, in an attempt to defend sylvester stallone. overboard comes to mind.

btw- other than facial hair, you look exactly the same. i think you may have even taken the pics in the same day. lame.

Dude, weren’t you the one that was getting all weepy because you thought your childhood hero was possibly getting busted for roids? This dude attempts to support Sly with visual evidence of changing facial appearance with weight change, and you bash him because of his screen name and the fact that he has a poster of Rocky on his wall. I’ll never understand some people.

yea jackass, taht was me crying about stallone. the point was theres virtually no difference in that guys face. in fact, the pics look like they couldve been taken on the same day. any SLIGHT variation in the guys face could be attributed to a different angle.

made no sense…4 months ago this guy happened to just take a BS pic of just his face, and he happened to be right in front of a rocky poster. unbelievable. try to READ. [/quote]

Yeah, I did just happen to take picture of my face to put up on my myspace. And I took the latest one to show my weight loss. And it doesn’t matter where I take the picutre in my apartment, a Sly poster will be in the background.

And people that actually know me say I look like a cancer patient now. It doesn’t really matter what you think. All that matters to me is that I start lifting again April 1. This incident with Sly was made into more than what it was. Let’s get ready for Rambo IV!

137

So it was HGH.

I wonder whether the charge is extraditable or if he can tell the aussies to go fuck themselves.

138

Yup - confirmed as HGH.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/SHOWBIZ/Movies/03/12/stallone.australia.ap/index.html

And for the record - his face looks like it’s been through more than just normal aging. Look at that lantern jaw…

139

did he use micky rourke’s surgeon?

or a lump hammer

He was an excellent specimen in demolition man, but there seem to have been a few strange choices in the last 10 years

140

I’m not too surprised. While I understood the argument by some that people’s faces change as they age, his does appear to have some structural changes.

I don’t think it matters, really. If he’s happier and feels better, then that’s good. If I’m still around, you can bet I’ll probably be looking into some HRT when I am that age.