I am putting out this information out there for whoever is interested to read about it, nobody is putting a gun to your head and making you read this. If its not entertaining enough for you move along.
I can assure you that I find this quite entertaining. What I donāt see is any objective evidence. Did your body composition change any? Did your bloodwork look like dogshit? Did your T levels return to normal post cycle?
You didnāt give any legitimate information, that is what Iām getting at.
1 Like
The first one was taken before i started with the cycle, the second one after a week of bulking.
The next one will come on monday two weeks after the last one with one week bulking and ome week cutting.
3 questions:
Are these bodyfat impedance tests?
Are you doing 1 week cut/bulk cycles?
Why are you so interested in showing information that isnāt a picture of your progress?
1 Like
Iād rather see the labwork
1 Like
Why did you post some papers instead of a selfie?
The fact you cant post a pic, says that there is something really fishy.
1 Like
The results (which come from a machine with not much accuracy), show a 0.4 point in percentage drop in BF, and 2 kg of LBM. These results are within the error range of the machine.
The picture probably isnāt coming because OP is at 25% BF in the scan (which means between about 22-28% BF).
3 Likes
because there is nothing to showā¦
it is super rare for a cocky dude to take boatload of shit, gain good and not stuff it in everyones faceā¦
if that shit worked, we would be seeing all kinds of picsā¦ its like when a girl gets boobs - she wont be hiding them, she will buy a whole new wardrobe to show em offā¦ not a receipt for the surgery, lol.
when a dude gets jacked good, he will be wearing tank tops in winter, if there is someone who would see his arms, lolā¦
5 Likes
this is in like 4 monthsā¦ probably doable natty, heh.
2 Likes
The two documents are 7 days apart.
And for all you who insist on seeing pictures dont bother replying with your photoshopped change in lighting before and after pics, resaults are measured in black and white and i didnt ooen this thread for approved or admiration its strictly so that the info is out there so even if only 1 person in ten years is interested in reading and gathering their own conclusions that was worth the post.
The rest of you fuckers can search another thread 
1 Like
And they will conclude you are a moron who made no gains whatsoever after being warned not to do exactly what you did.
You havenāt provided any fucking evidence except what I imagine to be impedance tests, which are notoriously inaccurate. but keep on finding excuses not to post a before/after picture though!
2 Likes
Christ youāre stupid.
3 Likes
All of your questions have been answered, read thouroghly
No, they havenāt. I asked about your bulk/cut info, your bloodwork, and your body composition progress.
Impedance tests arenāt accurate, so whatever shit youāve sent is irrelevant.
Who wouldāve thought that someone who took a shitload of SARMs wouldnāt have understood the value of objective evidence? The irony is killing me
1 Like
Get lipids checked
@berserker87 , I have been curious about SARMS. Iāve used AAS for some time now, done my research, had labs, know how I subjectively feel on different compounds etc. SARMs just donāt have the length of history AAS does, so data is subjective at best and limited. I know what you are trying to do here and understand what you think you are saying, but if I wanted to know about SARMs, I canāt get it from your post. So, if you are doing this for others interested in SARMs themselves, and not just posting notes for yourself, some of the things people are asking you for are to help you write the post you want to. You have too many SARMs at once to know what is even making an impact. My advice to you, if I was to follow your use and progress in the future, is to pick one substance, post some prior stats, progressive stats, and ending stats, as well as how it subjectively impacted you, and I would find that very useful. I donāt care about your pics and honestly donāt need to see them as long as you post objective measures.
2 Likes
This is what Iām figuring, yep. He had no problem posting before/after pics during his clen/dnp cycle last year.
No doubt heās just self-conscious about being in worse shape than his previous before pic.
1 Like
Love how the after pic is after a motorcycle crash
This makes sense. I would front load with a bunch of Tren E, maybe 1000mg a week for 4 weeks. I wouldnāt worry much about a test base tho as it seems you have all bases covered.
1 Like