[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Also, hitting a dog is pointless and counterproductive. We’ve taken in abused dogs who cower and piss themselves everytime you raise your voice, hand or pick up something like a newspaper or stick. Some recovered, some never did.[/quote]
Classical correlation/causation fallacy above.
The biggest problem with animal husbandry as it concerns dogs is the pet market, which perpetuates poorly bred animals and the biggest problem is not “physical beauty”, because that’s all most breeders breed for - the problem is one of poor nerves. And this has infected the “working dog” market too such that’s it difficult with some working breeds to get a specimen that will actually perform adequately .
The dogs you describe could have had bad nerves and been a nightmare for any owner hence, “some recovered, SOME NEVER DID”. I’ll say it again (and I have a long working dog background), PROPER physical corrections have their place, but “proper” is usually “sparingly” and “surgical”.
A proper physical correct to a working dog can be the difference between LIFE AND DEATH. For example, you don’t break your hunting dog from chasing cattle, and you will have a dead dog because some farmer WILL shoot your dog, and he’ll be in his legal rights to do so.
Some people confuse physical corrections with a training methodology itself as opposed to a tool in your toolbox if training methods. Some people use harsh physical corrections every time a dog does something objectionable, or doesn’t follow a command. Of course, this is incorrect.
Physical corrections (and there are a wide range of “physical corrections”, ranging from a sharp tug on the leash to restricting air by that same leash) are a tool in your training tool box. With some breeds, there is no room for error when it comes to some behaviors, and therefore “harsh” corrections have their place as well.
It was once said by a very famous and successful trainer that one good harsh correction (when necessary) is less cruel than a lifetime of “nagging” corrections and I agree.
You have described (to the extent your correlation fallacy was accurate) abuse, not proper training, and not proper physical corrections. A properly administered harsh physical correction is not abuse.[/quote]
You’re talking about using a choker collar. I’m talking about people who regularly bash their dogs till they have broken broken bones and internal injuries. One of our dogs lost an eye from a beating she had taken.
Not sure what you mean by ‘poor nerves’ infecting the breeder market. Poorly bred mongrels infect the pet market. Poorly bred(i.e. selected for appearance) thoroughbreds have been a problem for centuries. The modern bulldog is a classic example. When it was no longer used in bull baiting breeders began selectively breeding for appearance.
See comparison in wikipedia between a working bulldog from 1790(oil painting) and a modern bulldog.[/quote]
No, I’m not limiting my comments to “using a choke collar”.
I agree that “regularly bash their dog” is counterproductive and abusive.
And I don’t need bulldog lesson
I collect that art and have many etchings, prints, etc. of bulldogs, terriers and other hunting dogs from the 1800’s.
When I say poor nerves, I mean that too many dogs do not respond well to stress. Stress can be anything from new surroundings, loud noises, children - whatever the trigger. Like a person, you don’t really know your animal until you’ve seen it under stress.