Easy there, Nostradamus, you didnt predict it, you said it was already here… before it happened. Thats like saying “the world ran out of chocolate!” 20 years before cacao stops growing, then saying “See? I told you!”
But yeah.
Vitriol tends to happen when someone makes a false accusation. In this case, both individuals sorted it out like grown men. I liked both comments before you made this comment, because seeing people make ammends makes me happy.
Since when are PWI threads entirely void of vitriol?
Oh no. I’m saying it directly. Take the biggest Marshal Mathers wanna be douche bag, or what ever the contemporary version of that is, and march that idiot through the center of town.
By the time he gets from one side to the other it will look like a parade of idealistic chicks who can “fix him” with their codependent vaginas.
On the other hand, women are attracted to men who are willing to take risks, strong, confident, etc. There are some though that misidentify the traits of pill popping, criminally active, bitch smacking jagoffs as the traits of a man who was built to overcome challenges and succeed in life.
All I know is that a good deal of single moms want to increase their fitness levels, and that’s good for my business as well as guys that like fit chicks
I saw a guy training a smoking hot girl today. Had her doing some effed up type GHR with a kettle bell while I was rocking 125# squats. The trainer was a troll. The guy in the squat rack next to me was doing sidebends with kettlebells.
Actually, this is potentially interesting for me as someone who is interested in studying online communities.
It’s in a platforms best interest to spark engagement. Could users like @Andrewgen_Receptors who create divisive, but highly engaging threads a net benefit?
I haven’t looked yet, but if there’s not existing research on it (highly unlikely) this might be a good project at some point
As mentioned, maybe in a later comment, I disagree with the legal advantage women have in controlling the outcome. It’s a three way decision, with the mute voice standing to lose the most.
The framing in your scenario is off, though. Women are left with the pregnancy in most cases. A pregnancy they were not alone in creating.
While there are exceptions, how many men would you expect to see beating down a pregnant flings door and fighting for custody? Do all men, even in committed relationships & even marriages stand up like they should?
Did the pregnancy require the man to participate? Is it really fair to expect the woman to bear the brunt of responsibility as a deadbeat or non-existent dad who may becourt ordered to pay a little child support at best?
Choice is and should be legally recognized as a two way street. If you were the one who stood to leave pregnant with an absentee partner (partner in the sense that it took two to make the baby), would you want control over the outcome?
Are you willing to give the 50/50 partnership required to redefine process? Are the majority of men engaging in casual sex or loosely committed relationships?
No. Instead they start bullshit YouTube channels and try to convince an audience that being a piece of shit and expecting someone else to carry the water is just the way it is, with a little bit of a projected victim mentality thrown in. It’s a pussy way to be, honestly.
Forget feminism/red pill and whatever other categorized and packaged messaging is out there and think about it objectively.
Do women sometimes misread intent? Yeah. Is this a surprise? A character flaw? Does it negate men being 50% responsible for the creation of offspring?
Do men ever misread intent and get led on by women, maybe with a different end consequence? Are people sometimes disappointed by those they thought they could trust? Is this a problem or a green light to be a dipshit?
Maybe I’m not understanding the backdrop of your premise.