I see that as reasonable. If the end is in sight and they both know it, she knows she’s going to need somewhere to land.
So why doesn’t the husband do the same?
Why does the husband try to keep the family together (even if it’s NOT in his own best interest)?
Why does the wife look to see what’s best for her (even if it’s NOT what’s best for her children)?
Yes, that’s part of it.
So that sounds more like biological imperative than whimsical emotional brain taffy.
Largely… liberals hate everything to include men, the family unit, traditional morals and values, the patriarchy, children in the womb, themselves
2 Likes
In that context it’s sensible. I mean she needs somewhere to live. But why is she running off with another man instead of working on her family for no valid reason? Women can commit adultery in this country, run off with another guy, and collect payments from the ex-husband.
1 Like
I should add I think she should be free to leave. But if there was no fault of the man, she should awarded nothing, not even custody. Same for men that want to run off with a secretary.
They are exactly the same lol.
This guy is my best option and I’ll be completely loyal to him!
(5 minutes later)
This guy is better than that old loser I was just with so I’ll be completely loyal to new guy!
Now add the internet and a 50-mile radius in a densely populated city.
1 Like
Who says they do?
Are men some pillar of virtue? Stats don’t tell the whole story man.
Is this some philosophical “natural state” construct we’re talking about or real life?
I actually think there is zero problem with hypergamy. It’s necessary. And if women aren’t hypergamous, they bed down with scum (at very young ages), which destroys society. But… once she makes a choice in monogamous marriage, the hypergamy is terminated. Like Devlin said, we cannot tolerate rotating polyandry.
2 Likes
My ex is not particularly liberal, but I think there is a strong connection. Marxist critique directly led to modern feminist ideas about oppression and the patriarchy, so there’s that obvious connection.
The liberal tendency is to latch on to abstract ideas, find bad outcomes in reality, and conclude that making radical changes will lead to a future idealized outcome.
Meanwhile, in reality, you just left a guy who loved your kid like his own, made good money, wasn’t abusive at all and was loyal. Years have since gone on and whatever her idealized outcome was, it hasn’t happened for her.
2 Likes
I mean, men literally built the entire world as a relatively benevolent system for the benefit of their own family, so… yes.
2 Likes
I don’t think so.
Going from silly girl women making dumb choices to biological imperatives in the same sentence just doesn’t jive with me, unless you can somehow tie whimsical emotional choices to genetic predisposition.
@marine77 I think you will appreciate this excellent orated essay, Rotating Polyandry and Its Enforcers. There are four parts.
We didn’t eat the fruit first. That fucking snake got Eve to feed Adam, THE MAN, forbidden fruit.
You really going to synopsise the entire human history of civilization on one wobbly axiom?
Who did all of the fucking then? Atilla The Hun or were his concubines just milking him for his DNA, and he was just a hapless plunderer at the mercy of their craven hypergamy?
1 Like
There are some wild stats on his prolific reproductive abilities.
Maybe you’ll find this interesting. It’s a talk on the feminist degradation of black men.emphasized text
1 Like
Better than Nick Cannon?