[quote]redsox348984 wrote:
jlesk68 wrote:
Professor X wrote:
jlesk68 wrote:
dude, you can’t flex fat and your CNS can’t recruit it to lift heavy weight. Forget about “bulking up” (another phrase for “get fat to try to look big with clothes on”) just train.
That actually isn’t what bulking up means at all. I suppose the only people who would even think that way would be those who no one can tell lifts when they wear clothes. Maybe it makes you feel better to think the shoulders, chest and biceps filling out their shirts isn’t muscle.
Don’t you think that if you’re 20%BF you’re already eating to “bulk up” and your concern should be training?
This kid is 17 y/o, 6 feet tall and is 219 @ 20%bf, I’m sorry but this guy just wants to “look” big, at that heght, weight and bf you got no shoulders, chest and biceps to fill your socks.
you make it sound like i dont take my training seriously and you are wrong on that. i dont care about looking big as my main concern is ho wmuch weight i can lift. you also make it osund like im a complete fat ass[/quote]
In my case, my goals are strength, with mass as being basically a tool to lift more, and also an eventual side effect of gaining strength.
With that in mind, I have always followed the general principal to bulk your weak points (more reps, more volume and perhaps doubling the frequency) and to train your stong points for low rep strength alone.
So for example, I train my chest only for heavy triples, and same with my hips and quads, but since my lockout was a weakness, I focused more volume into triceps and shoulders. Now they are getting to be strong points.
Now I have realized that my biceps and upper back are weaknesses, and so I put more volume of training into them and to get in 2 good focused sessions/week just on the upper back and 2 for my biceps and forearms and grip.
In your case, your rows and deadlift and curls are your best lifts.
Where do you stall on a max squat and bench press?
Again, this is with the goal of maximal strength in the powerlifts.