Sex Before Marriage a Sin

So… it takes religion to feel guilt over random sex with strangers… got it. Good to know that one needs a religious insitution to impart chivalry, decency, and the ability to keep control of your dick.

If you’re no more than an animal, I propose removing all clothing, technology, and returning to the wild, trying to find a mate and pro-creating to spread your seed. Oh, and you’ll be competing against other males for the available females, so best hope you’re the dominant one or you won’t be getting any.

I love how the atheist intentionally tries to poke in the eye over religion. Why not try to just be a decent human being who has some self-control? Its not torture, its called having some self-restraint. We didn’t “evolve” to continue being animals.

Hey Quasi, I agree, but being that you just make simple statements of the obvious, why don’t I just follow you around the forum
with a simple ‘‘No Shit Sherlock’’ comment right after you?

Goodness gracious I think I found a cure for insomnia…Reading ‘‘Quasi-Quotes’’.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

I am proud to be an atheist and therefore can enjoy sex free of any and all guilt.
[/quote]

Any sex?[/quote]

Any form of sex with a woman over the age of consent.

[quote]Karado wrote:
Hey Quasi, I agree, but being that you just make simple statements of the obvious, why don’t I just follow you around the forum
with a simple ‘‘No Shit Sherlock’’ comment right after you?

Goodness gracious I think I found a cure for insomnia…Reading ‘‘Quasi-Quotes’’.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. [/quote]

Do whatever compels you, it is a free speech forum.

And if the world was packed with common sense and knowledge of “the obvious” we’d have far less problems/stupidity.

What makes you think Athiests don’t have morals and boundaries regarding sex in the first place?
All the Athiests I know don’t fuck children, but some Priests do fuck little boys without guilt.

They have no reason to feel guilt and can simply enjoy whatever they like. As Titan stated, its only “our God” that’s limiting us.

As animals - from an evolutionary standpoint - have no issue with doing whatever suits them or meets their instinctual needs, there are clearly no limitations on atheists. Morals are for religious folk. Just do what feels good for you. True freedom.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

I am proud to be an atheist and therefore can enjoy sex free of any and all guilt.
[/quote]

Any sex?[/quote]

Any form of sex with a woman over the age of consent. [/quote]

Why the qualifiers? You’re an atheist, you should be free to enjoy ANY sex free of any and all guilt.[/quote]
Because I;ve been lurking long enough to know when I see a trap. Just because I’m not religious doesn’t mean that I don’t have morals, if that is what you are insinuating.

[quote]Karado wrote:
What makes you think Athiests don’t have morals and boundaries regarding sex in the first place?
All the Athiests I know don’t fuck children, but some Priests do fuck little boys without guilt.[/quote]

This is exactly my point.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

Why the qualifiers? You’re an atheist, you should be free to enjoy ANY sex free of any and all guilt.[/quote]

An “atheist” can believe in extraphysical morality as easily as a Christian or a Jew. I put it between quotations because I would say that this person is not exactly an atheist and certainly not a pure physicalist in the vein of Richard Dawkins. But there is no reason that belief in an authorless extraphysical set of rules should be considered any less reasonable or logical than belief in a timeless uncontingent extraphysical rule-setter.

[quote]Karado wrote:
What makes you think Athiests don’t have morals and boundaries regarding sex in the first place?
All the Athiests I know don’t fuck children, but some Priests do fuck little boys without guilt.[/quote]

How do you know they have no guilt?

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

Push, I think we were so busy discussing the literality or metaphoricity of Genesis for the bazillionth time that I don’t think I heard your answer to the OP’s question.

Sex before marriage: sin or no sin?

[/quote]

I have written extensively on this subject. Probably more than every other T-Nation member combined.

My response to you is to read those other threads. There’s no sense in me doing all that typing all over again.

I think there’s a fairly recent one, even, that we went 'round and 'round on right before you showed back up.[/quote]

Do you have the links, or simply remember the names of the thread(s)

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]clip11 wrote:
Couldn’t God have designed us so that we didn’t have any sex drive until after marriage, and even then, it was only directed towards our spouse? [/quote]

I am proud to be an atheist and therefore can enjoy sex free of any and all guilt. That is a good question Clip, I don’t know why your God would want to torture his people so. I can say there is an easy answer to your sex drive question if you look at it from an evolutionary standpoint.
[/quote]

*** Atheist means “No God” as in if one declares themselves as such they are either a moron or they don’t understand what the word means. You do know you can’t prove a negative? Hence those declaring themselves as atheists are gullible for propaganda that says atheism is “cool” without really understanding to declare themselves as such is a form of insanity.

[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
They have no reason to feel guilt and can simply enjoy whatever they like. As Titan stated, its only “our God” that’s limiting us.

As animals - from an evolutionary standpoint - have no issue with doing whatever suits them or meets their instinctual needs, there are clearly no limitations on atheists. Morals are for religious folk. Just do what feels good for you. True freedom.[/quote]

All social primates feel a form of guilt or shame if they act out of accordance with the rules of the group. Fear of retribution for misdeeds and anticipation of rewards for “correct behavior” is as much a feature of societies of Celebes macaques, Sumatran orang-utans, mountain gorillas, chimps and bonobos as they are in our own societies.

Sexual behavior is highly regulated in these societies as well, even among the famously promiscuous bonobos. Even in these societies brother-sister incest is frowned upon, and in the more strongly patriarchal societies of macaques and chimps, adultery is not tolerated: you don’t fuck the boss’s wife without severe consequences. This is not to say that adultery never happens.

I once watched a pair of macaques, the boss macaque’s young mate and one of her young lovers, sneaking behind the bushes out of sight of the boss for some afternoon delight. They started going at it, but every fifteen seconds or so there would be a rustling in the bushes, and the female would freeze, with a look of absolute guilt and fear on her face. Her boyfriend would wait until she had realized that her husband wasn’t going to burst out of the bushes, then they’d start in again. Until another snapping twig would interrupt their fun once again.

At another time, I watched a family of orang-utans playing out a hilarious love triangle drama worthy of a TV sitcom. The family consisted of Dad, Mom, Junior (a six-month-old baby) and Auntie (Mom’s younger, hotter sister). The story begins with Dad, trying to relax under a tree. Junior comes bounding over wanting to play. Dad clearly wants nothing more than to get a few more minutes of sleep, but Junior is insistent.

“Dad! Dad! Dad! Dad! Let’s play, Dad! c’mon, Dad! Dad!”
“Uggghhhhh. Not now. Go away.”
“But Daaaaaad…”

At this point Mom intervenes.

“Why won’t you play with your son? Are you going to just lie around all day?”
“Ughhh. I don’t need this shit.”
“Come on, Junior. Leave your father alone. He’s too busy to devote any time to us right now!”

Fifteen minutes later, with Junior and Mom off doing something else, Dad is up in a tree with his wife’s sister. Auntie is smoothing Dad’s hair, caressing him, soothing his temper.

“It’s okay. I know, my sister can be a bitch.”
“She didn’t used to be this way. It’s like, ever since the kid came along, that’s all she cares about.”
“Well, if you ever get lonely, you can always swing by my place.”

He caresses her face. He’s just about to kiss her when he hears Mom and Junior approaching.
“Oh, shit. Shit! They’re coming. Look, I gotta go. I’ll see you, though. Soon.”

Dad swings down and goes off with Mom and Junior. Auntie watches wistfully, then sighs and starts masturbating.

This actually happened. The dialogue, of course, I imagined, but it was clear by gesture and facial expression that this was going on.

I have no idea what Macaque or Orang-utan religion is like. I don’t know the names of their Ape gods, nor have I read the holy Ape scriptures which command them not to commit ape-dultery. What I do know, though, is that they adhere to (or pretend to adhere to) very strict sexual mores, which mirror human mores very closely (or more accurately, ours mirror theirs).

The only difference is, they probably don’t believe that their morality and laws came from anywhere but the consensus of the group.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]smh23 wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

Why the qualifiers? You’re an atheist, you should be free to enjoy ANY sex free of any and all guilt.[/quote]

An “atheist” can believe in extraphysical morality as easily as a Christian or a Jew. I put it between quotations because I would say that this person is not exactly an atheist and certainly not a pure physicalist in the vein of Richard Dawkins. But there is no reason that belief in an authorless extraphysical set of rules should be considered any less reasonable or logical than belief in a timeless uncontingent extraphysical rule-setter.[/quote]

Sure there is.

The atheist is just an evolved animal living in a non-created timeless universe. When he dies it’s no different than when a roach dies. Or the bacteria in the intestinal walls of the roach. There’s no rational reason for any extraphysical morality reasonable set of rules for a bacteria…or a human. None. [/quote]

I agree with your first two sentences but then you just start spewing out nonsense. Are you claiming that you need to believe in a god in order to have morals? I don’t believe in a god but I believe in myself and I do possess a conscious.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]Quasi-Tech wrote:
They have no reason to feel guilt and can simply enjoy whatever they like. As Titan stated, its only “our God” that’s limiting us.

As animals - from an evolutionary standpoint - have no issue with doing whatever suits them or meets their instinctual needs, there are clearly no limitations on atheists. Morals are for religious folk. Just do what feels good for you. True freedom.[/quote]

All social primates feel a form of guilt or shame if they act out of accordance with the rules of the group. Fear of retribution for misdeeds and anticipation of rewards for “correct behavior” is as much a feature of societies of Celebes macaques, Sumatran orang-utans, mountain gorillas, chimps and bonobos as they are in our own societies.

Sexual behavior is highly regulated in these societies as well, even among the famously promiscuous bonobos. Even in these societies brother-sister incest is frowned upon, and in the more strongly patriarchal societies of macaques and chimps, adultery is not tolerated: you don’t fuck the boss’s wife without severe consequences. This is not to say that adultery never happens.

I once watched a pair of macaques, the boss macaque’s young mate and one of her young lovers, sneaking behind the bushes out of sight of the boss for some afternoon delight. They started going at it, but every fifteen seconds or so there would be a rustling in the bushes, and the female would freeze, with a look of absolute guilt and fear on her face. Her boyfriend would wait until she had realized that her husband wasn’t going to burst out of the bushes, then they’d start in again. Until another snapping twig would interrupt their fun once again.

At another time, I watched a family of orang-utans playing out a hilarious love triangle drama worthy of a TV sitcom. The family consisted of Dad, Mom, Junior (a six-month-old baby) and Auntie (Mom’s younger, hotter sister). The story begins with Dad, trying to relax under a tree. Junior comes bounding over wanting to play. Dad clearly wants nothing more than to get a few more minutes of sleep, but Junior is insistent.

“Dad! Dad! Dad! Dad! Let’s play, Dad! c’mon, Dad! Dad!”
“Uggghhhhh. Not now. Go away.”
“But Daaaaaad…”

At this point Mom intervenes.

“Why won’t you play with your son? Are you going to just lie around all day?”
“Ughhh. I don’t need this shit.”
“Come on, Junior. Leave your father alone. He’s too busy to devote any time to us right now!”

Fifteen minutes later, with Junior and Mom off doing something else, Dad is up in a tree with his wife’s sister. Auntie is smoothing Dad’s hair, caressing him, soothing his temper.

“It’s okay. I know, my sister can be a bitch.”
“She didn’t used to be this way. It’s like, ever since the kid came along, that’s all she cares about.”
“Well, if you ever get lonely, you can always swing by my place.”

He caresses her face. He’s just about to kiss her when he hears Mom and Junior approaching.
“Oh, shit. Shit! They’re coming. Look, I gotta go. I’ll see you, though. Soon.”

Dad swings down and goes off with Mom and Junior. Auntie watches wistfully, then sighs and starts masturbating.

This actually happened. The dialogue, of course, I imagined, but it was clear by gesture and facial expression that this was going on.

I have no idea what Macaque or Orang-utan religion is like. I don’t know the names of their Ape gods, nor have I read the holy Ape scriptures which command them not to commit ape-dultery. What I do know, though, is that they adhere to (or pretend to adhere to) very strict sexual mores, which mirror human mores very closely (or more accurately, ours mirror theirs).

The only difference is, they probably don’t believe that their morality and laws came from anywhere but the consensus of the group. [/quote]

So, where do you think this moral code comes from? Was it put into us by ourselves, or maybe a creator?