[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[Because I recently read a post on here where a christian described genocide as a way to save children from a life of sin [/quote]
Nowadays we call that a human right. You know, to keep them from living in poverty
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
<<< Because I recently read a post on here where a christian described genocide as a way to save children from a life of sin and deliver them to the hands of the Lord Sky Wizard. >>>[/quote]Could I prevail upon you to point me to where this was said?
[quote]Sloth wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[Because I recently read a post on here where a christian described genocide as a way to save children from a life of sin [/quote]
Nowadays we call that a human right. You know, to keep them from living in poverty[/quote]
x2…what is it now…1.4 million every year in the U.S. are murdered. And, 60 million world wide every year. Because you know Christians are committing all this genocide.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Still dodging I see.[/quote]
I haven’t made the claim that the Bible is inerrant, show me where I did. If I haven’t made the claim, why do you insist that I prove a claim I haven’t made.[/quote]
You make it OVER and OVER and OVER. Then you try to pull this bullshit:
“So, even though the Bible is not fallible, it is not infallible either.”[/quote]
Inerrant and infallible are not the same thing, sorry brother.[/quote]
“So, even though the Bible is not fallible, it is not infallible either.”
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Of course you condone it. Just because you hand off a sword to someone else and let them make the tough choices, doesn’t mean you aren’t condoning it.
And stop worrying about your safety, unlike Christians, CappedAndPlanIt has the ability to act Christ-like.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Still dodging I see.[/quote]
I haven’t made the claim that the Bible is inerrant, show me where I did. If I haven’t made the claim, why do you insist that I prove a claim I haven’t made.[/quote]
You make it OVER and OVER and OVER. Then you try to pull this bullshit:
“So, even though the Bible is not fallible, it is not infallible either.”[/quote]
Inerrant and infallible are not the same thing, sorry brother.[/quote]
“So, even though the Bible is not fallible, it is not infallible either.”[/quote]
I guess I’ll have to explain it OVER and OVER and OVER, until you get it.
Infallible deals with an active agent…like you or me or a person, not a book. Inerrant deals with the Bible.
Do you get it now? Or, are you going to past what I said about the Bible again?
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Of course you condone it. Just because you hand off a sword to someone else and let them make the tough choices, doesn’t mean you aren’t condoning it.
And stop worrying about your safety, unlike Christians, CappedAndPlanIt has the ability to act Christ-like.[/quote]
I didn’t know Christ acted belligerent and went around making fallacious arguments.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Still dodging I see.[/quote]
I haven’t made the claim that the Bible is inerrant, show me where I did. If I haven’t made the claim, why do you insist that I prove a claim I haven’t made.[/quote]
You make it OVER and OVER and OVER. Then you try to pull this bullshit:
“So, even though the Bible is not fallible, it is not infallible either.”[/quote]
Inerrant and infallible are not the same thing, sorry brother.[/quote]
“So, even though the Bible is not fallible, it is not infallible either.”[/quote]
I guess I’ll have to explain it OVER and OVER and OVER, until you get it.
Infallible deals with an active agent…like you or me or a person, not a book. Inerrant deals with the Bible.
Do you get it now? Or, are you going to past what I said about the Bible again?[/quote]
You are saying something is not infallible while claiming it isn’t fallible.
No, makes sense.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
Still dodging I see.[/quote]
I haven’t made the claim that the Bible is inerrant, show me where I did. If I haven’t made the claim, why do you insist that I prove a claim I haven’t made.[/quote]
You make it OVER and OVER and OVER. Then you try to pull this bullshit:
“So, even though the Bible is not fallible, it is not infallible either.”[/quote]
Inerrant and infallible are not the same thing, sorry brother.[/quote]
“So, even though the Bible is not fallible, it is not infallible either.”[/quote]
I guess I’ll have to explain it OVER and OVER and OVER, until you get it.
Infallible deals with an active agent…like you or me or a person, not a book. Inerrant deals with the Bible.
Do you get it now? Or, are you going to past what I said about the Bible again?[/quote]
You are saying something is not infallible while claiming it isn’t fallible.
No, makes sense.[/quote]
I see. I was pointing out that you can’t describe the Bible by the term fallible or infallible, because the word “fallible” is something that is only can describe an active agents teaching, like Obama is fallible, and Bush is fallible; however, the constitution can’t be fallible and it can’t be infallible, because it is not an active agent, it can’t teach.
However, the Bible can be inerrant, because inerrant is describing formal errors, not correctness of its teaching, as the Bible can’t teach. See what I am saying?
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
This is indisputable[/quote]
No, a second purpose was to prohibit state endorsement of any PARTICULAR religion. But I agree that today’s extreme interpretation is not what was originally intended. Prohibitions on a moment of silence in homeroom at school are simply simply. I surprise there hasn’t been an impetus to remove “In God we Trust” from coins. Or maybe there has…
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
This is indisputable[/quote]
No, a second purpose was to prohibit state endorsement of any PARTICULAR religion. But I agree that today’s extreme interpretation is not what was originally intended. Prohibitions on a moment of silence in homeroom at school are simply simply. I surprise there hasn’t been an impetus to remove “In God we Trust” from coins. Or maybe there has…[/quote]
They have been trying to remove that for years.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Of course you condone it. Just because you hand off a sword to someone else and let them make the tough choices, doesn’t mean you aren’t condoning it.
And stop worrying about your safety, unlike Christians, CappedAndPlanIt has the ability to act Christ-like.[/quote]
I didn’t know Christ acted belligerent and went around making fallacious arguments.[/quote]
Quit talkin shit, boy. Didn’t Jesus flip over some tables in a church yelling about how the people selling things had “made a whorehouse of his fathers home” or somesuch? Not belligerent my ass. stfu.
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Of course you condone it. Just because you hand off a sword to someone else and let them make the tough choices, doesn’t mean you aren’t condoning it.
And stop worrying about your safety, unlike Christians, CappedAndPlanIt has the ability to act Christ-like.[/quote]
I didn’t know Christ acted belligerent and went around making fallacious arguments.[/quote]
Quit talkin shit, boy. Didn’t Jesus flip over some tables in a church yelling about how the people selling things had “made a whorehouse of his fathers home” or somesuch? Not belligerent my ass. stfu.[/quote]
So, you’re claiming what you do is righteous indignation?
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Oh please.
He changed his mind once, He can do it again.
Now you can say He promised not to, but that does of course mean taking His word for it which is kind of a circular of seeing things.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]jsbrook wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
This is indisputable[/quote]
No, a second purpose was to prohibit state endorsement of any PARTICULAR religion. But I agree that today’s extreme interpretation is not what was originally intended. Prohibitions on a moment of silence in homeroom at school are simply simply. I surprise there hasn’t been an impetus to remove “In God we Trust” from coins. Or maybe there has…[/quote]
They have been trying to remove that for years.[/quote]
Yeah. That post was a little sloppy. It was supposed to read:
“No, a second purpose was to prohibit state endorsement of any PARTICULAR religion. But I agree that today’s extreme interpretation is not what was originally intended. Prohibitions on a moment of silence in homeroom at school are simply ridiculous. I’m surprised there hasn’t been an impetus to remove “In God we Trust” from coins. Or maybe there has been…”
But you guys got the idea.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Of course you condone it. Just because you hand off a sword to someone else and let them make the tough choices, doesn’t mean you aren’t condoning it.
And stop worrying about your safety, unlike Christians, CappedAndPlanIt has the ability to act Christ-like.[/quote]
I didn’t know Christ acted belligerent and went around making fallacious arguments.[/quote]
Quit talkin shit, boy. Didn’t Jesus flip over some tables in a church yelling about how the people selling things had “made a whorehouse of his fathers home” or somesuch? Not belligerent my ass. stfu.[/quote]
So, you’re claiming what you do is righteous indignation? [/quote]
Nope. Just that Jesus got him some belligerent when he wanted.
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Of course you condone it. Just because you hand off a sword to someone else and let them make the tough choices, doesn’t mean you aren’t condoning it.
And stop worrying about your safety, unlike Christians, CappedAndPlanIt has the ability to act Christ-like.[/quote]
I didn’t know Christ acted belligerent and went around making fallacious arguments.[/quote]
Quit talkin shit, boy. Didn’t Jesus flip over some tables in a church yelling about how the people selling things had “made a whorehouse of his fathers home” or somesuch? Not belligerent my ass. stfu.[/quote]
So, you’re claiming what you do is righteous indignation? [/quote]
Nope. Just that Jesus got him some belligerent when he wanted. [/quote]
That wasn’t belligerent, he had a valid argument. What they were doing in the synagogue was against the rules. There is a difference between righteous indignation and going around everywhere throwing a tantrum. Now, if you want to take a deep breath with me and behave in a civil manner, I think our conversations will go better, brother.
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Of course you condone it. Just because you hand off a sword to someone else and let them make the tough choices, doesn’t mean you aren’t condoning it.
And stop worrying about your safety, unlike Christians, CappedAndPlanIt has the ability to act Christ-like.[/quote]
I didn’t know Christ acted belligerent and went around making fallacious arguments.[/quote]
Quit talkin shit, boy. Didn’t Jesus flip over some tables in a church yelling about how the people selling things had “made a whorehouse of his fathers home” or somesuch? Not belligerent my ass. stfu.[/quote]
So, you’re claiming what you do is righteous indignation? [/quote]
Nope. Just that Jesus got him some belligerent when he wanted. [/quote]
That wasn’t belligerent, he had a valid argument. What they were doing in the synagogue was against the rules. There is a difference between righteous indignation and going around everywhere throwing a tantrum. Now, if you want to take a deep breath with me and behave in a civil manner, I think our conversations will go better, brother.[/quote]
Ok, deal.
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
[quote]forbes wrote:
I can tell CappedAndPlanIt is very angry.
How many times do I have to say that I would never condone the killing of a child. Divine revelation is done and God will never ask anyone to do such a thing. I am NOT a menace to society. The story of Joshua was thousands of years ago.
Judging from your extreme hate talk Im starting to worry about my safety. [/quote]
Of course you condone it. Just because you hand off a sword to someone else and let them make the tough choices, doesn’t mean you aren’t condoning it.
And stop worrying about your safety, unlike Christians, CappedAndPlanIt has the ability to act Christ-like.[/quote]
I didn’t know Christ acted belligerent and went around making fallacious arguments.[/quote]
Quit talkin shit, boy. Didn’t Jesus flip over some tables in a church yelling about how the people selling things had “made a whorehouse of his fathers home” or somesuch? Not belligerent my ass. stfu.[/quote]
So, you’re claiming what you do is righteous indignation? [/quote]
Nope. Just that Jesus got him some belligerent when he wanted. [/quote]
That wasn’t belligerent, he had a valid argument. What they were doing in the synagogue was against the rules. There is a difference between righteous indignation and going around everywhere throwing a tantrum. Now, if you want to take a deep breath with me and behave in a civil manner, I think our conversations will go better, brother.[/quote]
Ok, deal. [/quote]
Deal. 
Chris - tried talking to Tirib about this, he seems to have dropped the line of conversation, so I’ll ask you.
If you and someone else both believe in mutually exclusive things, how do you come to an understanding or solution other than each of you saying “No, I’M right.” over and over again?
The reason us silly atheists on here keep harping about reason is that reason is the way people can communicate between each other. Your subjective beliefs and experiences mean nothing to me, and mine mean nothing to you. But if we’re going to be affecting each other, we need to find a way to communicate that means something to the both of us.