Of course the moon landing was faked. The ship could never make it through the glass dome that keeps all the air in.
Whole thing was shady.
^entire post is in satire
I like the moon landing conspiracies more than ones like Flat Earth tbh. Flat earth is demonstrably false, while the moon landing one has a few holes that could be poked in it; you know the person is crazy if they link it to JFK or Roswell though… it’s very telling
In thread-related news, I heard NASA is going to support Ukraine’s space program #UnlimitedFunding #FTXRedux #Zelensky4Lyfe
My favorite is when the conspiracy theorists cant recognize the color fixed newer versions of the iconic photos…
I saw one video where a film camera specialist went through and figured out they couldn’t have faked the moon landing because the camera tech in 1969 wasn’t good enough - it was interesting.
Okay, agreed that companies/rich folks diversify.
How does say, Alphabet (a pure tech company) benefit off shaping the Russia narrative? Russia’s main natural resource is oil - not something Alphabet is using a crap ton of.
Again you are using extremely vague terms to back up what is a huge claim.
Please answer whether or not you think the earth is flat and the moon landing was faked. That will at least tell the rest of us where to rank what you say (I mean it’s already pretty low).
Blockquote
It depends on who are the owner of alphabet, what else they own, their interest (maybe they hate Russia too and don’t care about just making more money, who knows), who they owe their position to (these people are not as self made as you think they are), their kickbacks, etc. Generally you can assume they will make more business with other western company than Russian companies and will benefit if an ecosystem of western companies take hold of Russian ressources in the long run.
Blockquote
Public company.
Financial records and large stake holders are public records available on the internet.
Revenue is all accounted for and subject to audit.
Another macabre side effect in that while Russia is relatively unsuccessful in exterminating Ukrainians (not for want of trying, they’re doing their absolute genocidal worst in areas they’ve occupied) they’re doing a really stellar job of addressing the “problem” with non-Slavic minorities inside Russia proper.
Buryats, Tuvans, Chuvashi, Kalmyks, Mari, Mordovians (yes, that’s a real ethnic group) and a shitload of other non-Slavic people the vast majority of people never ever heard of are getting an one way ticket to extinction. Well, at least all the men under 60. Like this unit of non-Slavic Mari complaining to the Tsar Putin, not understanding that their “problem” is actually Putin’s “solution” of their “question”
Ok, you’re a serf so you cannot grasp this, but I’ll try to explain - Zelensky is an elected president, not a tsar, not a god-emperor nor a feudal lord that owns serfs. Therefore, he came to power via elections and - get this - will leave power after losing them or after his term expires. No poisonings, no palace coups…
And after him some other Ukrainian president will be elected and you’ll mentally assign him the same far reaching powers your seigneur holds over you.
The idea that one man can hold a population of 40 million in a fight is preposterous.
Ukrainians know that this a matter of biological survival, and I have some bad news for you - the KIA/WIA ratio of Ukrainian nazi-zionists or however you’re calling them is on par with correspoding US ratios in Afghanistan. The Russian ratio on the other hand is close to WW2.
And the other thing is that some people I know without military experience who’ve volunteered a year ago still haven’t received a call up for training. A long time (in terms of dead Tuvans, Dagestanis and others) before proverbial Ukrainian old men and boys show up on the battlefield.
