^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”
[quote]JEATON wrote:
Martinez out of New Mexico. However, I think she really damaged her brand when she caved and agreed to set up the health insurance exchange under obamacare. [/quote]
No doubt, but I think long term, this will help her and the GOP in general. When all the idiots who vote on shit like “binders” and “bigbird” and “47%” see their HI costs go up and up and up and up and up, they might actually start looking for real reasons to vote for people.
Fuck em, let it burn.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
He might be the best person on Earth, but he will get slaughtered in the press, and hoepfully the primary too…
That would be the worst thing to happen to the GOP since, well, they lost the cultrue war and Hollywood.
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
smh
“On the list”, yes…but not very high up.
Jeb is at odds with the party much like Christie is. He would get chewed up and spit out in the GOP primaries.
Mufasa
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I put this here because the Republicans want you to believe regulations are bad for America Eric Holder Admits Some Banks Are Just Too Big To Prosecute | HuffPost Impact
Right now it is OK to be a criminal if you are a BIG FUCKING CRIMINAL [/quote]
Lol at Dodd-Frank making the big banks bigger, and you still try and find a way to blame the Republicans…
Priceless. [/quote]
you will have to remind me which Party is against businesses being regulated ?
[/quote]
The Dems were agaisnt regulating Fanny & Freddy. That worked out well.
Look not all regulation is bad, but you are linking a peice that is in large part due to Dodd-Frank, in so much that the banks are bigger than ever, and trying to blame the party that voted against the bill…
[/quote]
I agree both parties are culpable . I think the whole process shows the weakness of our system . We allow lobbyist run our Government
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
He might be the best person on Earth, but he will get slaughtered in the press, and hoepfully the primary too…
That would be the worst thing to happen to the GOP since, well, they lost the cultrue war and Hollywood. [/quote]
He has George W Bush to thank
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
smh
“On the list”, yes…but not very high up.
Jeb is at odds with the party much like Christie is. He would get chewed up and spit out in the GOP primaries.
Mufasa[/quote]
He certainly would have in 2012, but I’m not counting out the possibility that Rove’s Victory fund and other like developments might change the landscape significantly.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
He might be the best person on Earth, but he will get slaughtered in the press, and hoepfully the primary too…
That would be the worst thing to happen to the GOP since, well, they lost the cultrue war and Hollywood. [/quote]
He has George W Bush to thank
[/quote]
What would you do if you didn’t have an evil rupublican to balme for all the world’s ills?
[quote]dmaddox wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I agree both sides are complicit but the Republicans think regulations unless it has something to do with personal liberty or sex is a bad thing[/quote]
Now Now. I love having sex with my wife all the time and I am a Republican. Republicans dont want to regulate sex. They only want to regulate the bad thing that happens after sex, usually during the first trimester.[/quote]
http://www.ontheissues.org/celeb/Republican_Party_Civil_Rights.htm
[quote]smh23 wrote:
[quote]Mufasa wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
smh
“On the list”, yes…but not very high up.
Jeb is at odds with the party much like Christie is. He would get chewed up and spit out in the GOP primaries.
Mufasa[/quote]
He certainly would have in 2012, but I’m not counting out the possibility that Rove’s Victory fund and other like developments might change the landscape significantly.
[/quote]
He’ll get some coverage, but it won’t be all the substancial.
I mean, he isn’t a token, so people think he’ll get chewed up in the primaries. When the fact is, if he is actually a conservative he’ll do fine.
The GOP ran a democrat against a progressive in 2012 and lost, Jeb would actually have to be a conservative to win.
W and Jeb arent’ close, from what I understand 43 hates Rove as well. The press will ignore the fact he isn’t his brother, so it would be a disaster for him to run as far as “changing the GOP” is concerned.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
He might be the best person on Earth, but he will get slaughtered in the press, and hoepfully the primary too…
That would be the worst thing to happen to the GOP since, well, they lost the cultrue war and Hollywood. [/quote]
He has George W Bush to thank
[/quote]
What would you do if you didn’t have an evil rupublican to balme for all the world’s ills?[/quote]
I am sorry Bush fucked up he started 2 wars and cut taxes. There is no pun needed
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
He might be the best person on Earth, but he will get slaughtered in the press, and hoepfully the primary too…
That would be the worst thing to happen to the GOP since, well, they lost the cultrue war and Hollywood. [/quote]
He has George W Bush to thank
[/quote]
What would you do if you didn’t have an evil rupublican to balme for all the world’s ills?[/quote]
I am sorry Bush fucked up he started 2 wars and cut taxes. There is no pun needed[/quote]
For the 300th time, federal revenue went UP during Bush’s years compared to Clintons. Up. That means increased… Cutting fucking taxes isn’t the god damn problem.
Not that I’m surprised you believe this, but are you a 9/11 truther now?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]smh23 wrote:
^ Add Jeb Bush to that list. His new book screams “I’m running.”[/quote]
He might be the best person on Earth, but he will get slaughtered in the press, and hoepfully the primary too…
That would be the worst thing to happen to the GOP since, well, they lost the cultrue war and Hollywood. [/quote]
He has George W Bush to thank
[/quote]
What would you do if you didn’t have an evil rupublican to balme for all the world’s ills?[/quote]
I am sorry Bush fucked up he started 2 wars and cut taxes. There is no pun needed[/quote]
For the 300th time, federal revenue went UP during Bush’s years compared to Clintons. Up. That means increased… Cutting fucking taxes isn’t the god damn problem.
Not that I’m surprised you believe this, but are you a 9/11 truther now?[/quote]
Since Obama has been President it has been a major issue . The Republicans can not connect the dots of increasing spending (2 WARS) and cutting revenue (TAX CUTS) equals huge deficits .
No I believe a radical Muslim faction hijacked I believe 4 planes ran 2 into the World trade centers and 1 into a field and 1 into the Pentagon
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Since Obama has been President it has been a major issue [/quote]
Okay, so that is somehow Bush’s fault? Seeing as he had enough control to pass AHA, why didn’t he fix the evil evil SUPER EVIL Bush tax cuts instead if it is such an issue?
Time 301: revenues went up under the Bush era tax cuts. Up. Increased. Where higher than before.
The Liberals can not connect the dots of economic downturn equals less tax reveune irrelevant of tax rate. Nor that, now almost 5 full years later they are still balming the old guy rather than their guy who failed to fix anything.
So… Those guys didn’t start a war? It was Bush?
Iraq is one thing, but you’re going to sit here and blame that shit on Bush? That is what is called “being a hack”.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
Since Obama has been President it has been a major issue [/quote]
Okay, so that is somehow Bush’s fault? Seeing as he had enough control to pass AHA, why didn’t he fix the evil evil SUPER EVIL Bush tax cuts instead if it is such an issue?
Time 301: revenues went up under the Bush era tax cuts. Up. Increased. Where higher than before.
The Liberals can not connect the dots of economic downturn equals less tax reveune irrelevant of tax rate. Nor that, now almost 5 full years later they are still balming the old guy rather than their guy who failed to fix anything.
So… Those guys didn’t start a war? It was Bush?
Iraq is one thing, but you’re going to sit here and blame that shit on Bush? That is what is called “being a hack”. [/quote]
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
So… Those guys didn’t start a war? It was Bush?
[/quote]
Those guys definitely didn’t start the Iraq War. Afghanistan, yes.
Both of you ignored the fact I said “iraq is one thing”…
But you’re right, all the pain in the world, 43’s fault.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Both of you ignored the fact I said “iraq is one thing”…
But you’re right, all the pain in the world, 43’s fault. [/quote]
No I did not ignore it but you did not say it was a total goat fuck either and it was
I can not find a price for just Iraq but I can tell you George spent at least a trillion of TAX PAYERS dollars to whack a guy that threatened his DADDY
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Both of you ignored the fact I said “iraq is one thing”…
But you’re right, all the pain in the world, 43’s fault. [/quote]
No I did not ignore it but you did not say it was a total goat fuck either and it was
I can not find a price for just Iraq but I can tell you George spent at least a trillion of TAX PAYERS dollars to whack a guy that threatened his DADDY
[/quote]
So, we have concluded that irrelevant the subject matter, you just want to find a reason to bash 43… Very well. Don’t let me, facts or circumstances get in the way.
FTR, I don’t agree with the Iraq war based on what I know. I’m not 43’s biggest fan. However, I will point out when he gets blamed for things that aren’t 100% his fault. The other thing with Iraq in particualr is I’m not about to disrespect the troops, their thoughts, mission or lives by going all John Kerry, 1960’s, “I Hate AMerica therefor I’m the real Patriot”, liberal about it.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Both of you ignored the fact I said “iraq is one thing”…
But you’re right, all the pain in the world, 43’s fault. [/quote]
No I did not ignore it but you did not say it was a total goat fuck either and it was
I can not find a price for just Iraq but I can tell you George spent at least a trillion of TAX PAYERS dollars to whack a guy that threatened his DADDY
[/quote]
So, we have concluded that irrelevant the subject matter, you just want to find a reason to bash 43… Very well. Don’t let me, facts or circumstances get in the way.
FTR, I don’t agree with the Iraq war based on what I know. I’m not 43’s biggest fan. However, I will point out when he gets blamed for things that aren’t 100% his fault. The other thing with Iraq in particualr is I’m not about to disrespect the troops, their thoughts, mission or lives by going all John Kerry, 1960’s, “I Hate AMerica therefor I’m the real Patriot”, liberal about it. [/quote]
Try and think of it this way let’s pretend that GWB was Bam for that situation . I think bush was a terrible President I think Bam is a OK except he tends to get caught up in the partisan bullshit happening but hey they all are