Not sure. I don’t agree with third trimester abortions as the unborn would probably live. Before that in not sure about how large the unborn will be, and if it’s an issue.
What does it matter that it would live? It already is living. The point is to medically correct that.
So she has to make sure, more than ever, that doesn’t come to be.
They save all the pieces to make Soros’ anti-aging elixir.
Just thinking on this a bit.
Many people have a problem with the last part. Not many have a problem with just dying.
Interesting.
How hard have you tried?
1 Like
You are right here. The lack of finding a good argument doesn’t mean that the conclusion is false, just indeterminate. Concluding a conclusion of an argument is false based on others arguing for it poorly is called a fallacy fallacy.
Yes.
Picture this: Your property is surrounded by busy roadways. You order something, knowing that it will be delivered by UPS. The UPS Driver brings your package to your door and leaves it. You demand the UPS Driver leave your property immediately. He walks to the edge of your property and waits for a break in traffic so that he can safely cross the street and get back to his vehicle. That break doesn’t come soon enough for you, so you push him off of your property and into the roadway. He is run over. Have you committed murder, or have you defended your property?
To be honest… I am not enough of a fool to ever lose such an easy argument, so I do not have to try hard. Any religion that declares such actions before common laws is idiotic and I rather die than live through that.
Funnily enough I would have to die, or be taken as a slave, or set as an example. I would chose death. I am a believer of science and its methods. Kill me before I pretend to follow your stone age beliefs.
2 Likes
You might not own that part of your property. There is a sidewalk on my property but I have to shovel the snow and maintain it because people have the right to use it safely. I even have to pay to replace it if it is rundown even though it’s not for me to use.
With that said, if it takes the driver 9 months to get off my lawn, he is getting a push.
So you popped into the thread to say science is your god, or why exactly?
Thank you for making this simple and easy. Peace.
If you feel that I have been unfair or something, feel free to clarify if you would like
Most likely to let off steam
I have had this discussion ad nauseam with various people of faith. You are taking two phrases out of context.
Let me clarify: I let many people state their point of views. However they fall flat on their face in the name of science and basic INHERENT human logic. Sharia law is stupid in it nature. There is no way to argue it isn’t illogical unless you think it is flawed. The erroneous nature on which it is founded is so ludicrous any argument in its favor is based on theism. (*I use the word “theism” to denote blind trust and a belief in a belief rather than in a belief of a fact.)
Who would’ve thought, right? A religious idea being evil… how odd.
Let me know if you would like to try promote sharia law?
(Just an add, I could not share this with my personal name in fear of imminent threat on my life - is that a normal religion to you?)
EDIT: If you are an American (I am not but entertain the idea you may be), you should absolutely adore freedom of speech, something sharia law does not even entertain. We are scared to criticize is because discussion and skepticism is not permitted. How fucking stupid is that!
Sometimes in certain settings I have done so and enjoyed it. It’s not something I need to do all the time
I asked you a question and got an incoherent answer, ironically
I agree with you, but saying their argument is bad doesn’t result in the conclusion that their position is wrong. It is better to argue how a secular system is better IMO, which you have done a bit (freedom of speech).
I am ok with religion and believe in religious freedom.
However, I do not tolerate conclusions based on religion.
“Don’t eat pork it is toxic” - I am sorry what the fuck?
If something in religion is incorrect (which a lot is) - we should be able to say so.
That is my main point. An inductive approach to life is not in anyone’s interest. I live my life deductively (which muslims often accuse mathematics of being inductive which is a fallacy)