[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]imhungry wrote:
JimmyLee09 wrote:
I have a real life example from my own experience in the past. I wanted to get bigger so was trying differnt exercise programs to see how my body responds.
I did a pumping program where I used light weights and high volume to increase the size of my muscles. When I say light, I mean light: 45 pound lat pull downs, 50 pound BARBELL curls, 135 pound bench press and so on.
The crazy thing is that my muscles got larger, I mean very large very quickly where people thoughtI was taking something. My arms grew big fast where even I was getting nervous about the fast results. My point is that yes people everywhere I went constanlty commented on my size, yet I never wanted people to know how weak I actually was.
When people needed help moving something big and heavy they would call me for help thinking it would be a piece of cake for me. In reality I had so much trouble that they would have been better off without my help. From a physique stand point yes I looked good, but for the size I had, I was completely useless for helping others move. I say that gaining muscle mass without strength is pointless. Now I have the size and strength to back it up.
I have a very strange feeling that you just might be full of shit.
I could be wrong.
But, I don’t think so.[/quote]
Judging by his other threads and posts I’d say he’s just a little misguided.
OP
You say you are a competing bodybuilder, correct?
If doing 50 lb. barbell curls makes your arms grow faster than using heavier weight, why on earth would you choose the method that resuts in slower progress?
I can’t see how trying to be as big/conditioned as possible and as strong as possible at the same time will result in anything but mediocrity in both. [/quote]
Isn’t max OT designed to be optimal for making one as big and strong as possible? it seems to be working very well for me. Jeff Willet and Skip LaCour are pretty badass too and they use it