Rape-aXe: Anti-rape Condom

Off Topic
162

[quote]Loudog75 wrote:
Some of you chaps seem to look at women as just a vajayjay and not a person. Put yourself in that situation. Consider that you’ve gone to prison, are you going to lay and pray? If you are, you might have been ghey all along and just now found out.

Me - I’m not going to lay down and take shit and I wouldn’t recommend that to anyone else. I would rather die fighting than allow anybody to take anything from me. I can’t fault any woman for feeling the same way and I would encourage her to do so.

And for everyone talking about how this will only make the rapist mad - so f’n what. Violence without retrubution only encourages more violence. When you punish a man to the extent that he can no longer deal with the retribution, he will deviate from the norm and leave you alone.

[/quote]

Those are my thoughts on fighting back also.

163

[quote]debraD wrote:
I won’t for a second pretend to understand what it’s like to be in the shoes of a woman in the parts of the world where it is this bad but from my own perspective I’ll take a severe beating with the rapist’s dick damaged over a gentler beating and a rape ANYDAY.

It’s not really a matter of adding up pros and cons and taking a sum of gains and losses at the end of the day but it’s about inflicting suffering on a despicable being that deserves that and more.

I understand the logic and the sense about it potentially making things worse for the woman but if it’s my cunt I don’t care.

So with that perspective, I think the woman should have a choice of whether this is going to be their approach. If it were me and I take a beating, at least the guy isn’t going to be raping anyone ELSE soon. [/quote]

Yep. If this is a choice a woman wants to take then it should be allowed.

I don’t believe it will come here, this is a country that has allowed states to outlaw vibrators in 1998 because women were using it and ignoring their husbands, it was only 15yrs ago that it was made illegal for a man to rape his wife, and some states still require physical damage to press a charge of rape.

So they won’t make this legal.

But I agree with you debra. I fought back and I read your post that you did. I completely believe that my fighting back saved me from being raped by two men. I was beat badly but I wasn’t raped.

But all the guys who are saying don’t piss off your rapist, if you do go to prison, make that your motto.

and like someone else said, it sounds like South Africa is Thunderdome for these women. They can’t afford a gun, they can be just as over powered if they pull a knife and then be stabbed with the knife.

I don’t know what the solution is in South Africa but I understand what motivated the doctor.

164

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
Seems to me like this thing is a necessary evil.

Having hooked barbs in my dick would make me think twice about raping someone else.[/quote]

You going to just keep raping yourself then?

165

Am I the only one freaked out about the possiblity of crazy bitches using this condom as a way to get back at their ex’s or any other guy?

166

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Neospartan wrote:
Fellas… Africa ain’t the US. There ain’t no doctors readily available, nor police, etc. S.Africa is the most stable Sub-Saharan African state. So if the stats are that bad there, just imagened what it is like elsewhere. To put it in prespective, a woman is in constant danger of being raped while a man is in constant danger of being killed.

That being said I am not in favor of this device. Simply because any woman who hurts her rapist this way is sure to be tortured and killed as revenge by the attacker and/or his buddies. And made an example for all the women in the village and nearby areas.

This thing is simply too short sighted… now in a country like the US, Canada, England, yeah sure that thing can work here.

[/quote]

You aren’t suggesting a Bobby Knight attitude towards rape are you? “I think that if rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it.”

I get what you are saying, and it is terrible that women are weaker than men, but that doesn’t mean they can’t fight back or that they shouldn’t.
[/quote]

What he is suggesting is that violent backlash is a very likely possibility. Women are weaker, and the backlash could result in permanent injury or death.

For that reason alone I personally have to worry about how sensible this idea is.[/quote]

This exactly. People arent stupid. You arent going to trick the gang of guys who plans to rape a woman by putting a penis trap in her vagina.

My question is how does one envision a society becoming more civilized if their women are being conditioned to expect being raped (even if they ALREADY expect to be rape, which I’d bet a lot do if the statistics are accurate, this ONLY reinforce that idea). It’s insane.

Obviously rape is a terrible thing, no sane person argues otherwise. But this isn’t the same as a cop wearing a bullet proof vest. This device will have an impact on the psyche of the women wearing it and generate extreme rage for the man who gets one on him which will undoubtedly be taken out on the woman.

I agree that the device will likely decrese the number of “successful” (for lack of a better term) rapes but the mental aspect of being attacked is still there.

This is like putting a bandaid on a chainsaw wound when it comes to this particular society.

Maybe the next step is to round up all men capable of getting an erection and chop their dicks off. It’s not like men wont any other ways to oppress women in a lawless society or anything. [/quote]

Did you read the article or just the headline?

Women are already inserting sponges with razor blades into their vaginas, babies are being raped to cure AIDS, rape is not a crime that is being brought to the courts.

What is your solution?

Instead of rounding up all the poor men that are going to be a victim to such a terrible thing when they are raping a girl that should just lay back and take it, maybe we should remove all the women from South Africa to some place where they don’t have to live their life waiting for them or their babies to be raped.

[/quote]

I saw this story over a week ago.

I understand that women are already doing retarded things to prevent rape. Now it’s turning into a scientific endeavor of the blind leading the blind. It’s a BAD plan. The only thing preventing this from being worse is that the inventor is not making money off it, yet.

The solution? CIVILIZE THE POPULATION. Reinforcing barbarism is just stupid. Im not an anthropologist. I dont know the best way to turn country of possible rapists into a 21st century society. But obviously there is a way to do it. Case in point: the rest of the civilized world. [/quote]

I agree with this. Obviously, this heinous crime is socially acceptable in S. Africa given the frightening frequency by which it occurs. So called pussy booby traps is not the solution and a would be rapist need only check her orifice for such a device. I also agree that getting “bit” by such a device would send a man into a rage and likely result in death or serious bodily injury. I agree with the female voice here too; you’re between a rock and a hard place. You either “Bobby Knight” it, or you fight back. Neither option is terribly appealing. Ms. October, you may have been sexually assaulted, and I don’t know the circumstances, but true rape is not a so called sex crime, it’s a crime of violence and aggression. If you’re the weaker sex and you’re not in a position to call attention to yourself where aid may arrive, you may very likely be killed during a rape - it happens all the time. It’s a fact.

The solution? Civilize the fucking country; starting with education and enforcement. No pussy booby trap is going to solve this problem. Period.

167

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]debraD wrote:
I won’t for a second pretend to understand what it’s like to be in the shoes of a woman in the parts of the world where it is this bad but from my own perspective I’ll take a severe beating with the rapist’s dick damaged over a gentler beating and a rape ANYDAY.

It’s not really a matter of adding up pros and cons and taking a sum of gains and losses at the end of the day but it’s about inflicting suffering on a despicable being that deserves that and more.

I understand the logic and the sense about it potentially making things worse for the woman but if it’s my cunt I don’t care.

So with that perspective, I think the woman should have a choice of whether this is going to be their approach. If it were me and I take a beating, at least the guy isn’t going to be raping anyone ELSE soon. [/quote]

Yep. If this is a choice a woman wants to take then it should be allowed.

I don’t believe it will come here, this is a country that has allowed states to outlaw vibrators in 1998 because women were using it and ignoring their husbands, it was only 15yrs ago that it was made illegal for a man to rape his wife, and some states still require physical damage to press a charge of rape.

So they won’t make this legal.

But I agree with you debra. I fought back and I read your post that you did. I completely believe that my fighting back saved me from being raped by two men. I was beat badly but I wasn’t raped.

But all the guys who are saying don’t piss off your rapist, if you do go to prison, make that your motto.

and like someone else said, it sounds like South Africa is Thunderdome for these women. They can’t afford a gun, they can be just as over powered if they pull a knife and then be stabbed with the knife.

I don’t know what the solution is in South Africa but I understand what motivated the doctor.
[/quote]

You and Deb both say you fought back and that is what saved you from being raped. Are you just purposefully ignoring the part where for this device to activate, your fighting back was unsuccessful and you were in fact, raped(he achieved penetration). There is a monumental difference between ‘man attacks woman with intent to rape, is repelled because the effort required to remove her clothes and penetrate her is too much, she is attracting too much attention, etc’ and ‘man attacks woman with intent to rape, despite her struggle he is able to penetrate her before a device clamps on to his dick.’

This device does not ‘fight off’ the man until he has already completely dominated you and is clearly ignoring any screaming for attention you are doing. I can’t dispute with Lanky that we know for sure what his reaction would be, but I have an INCREDIBLY difficult time imagining that he won’t at the very least smash your face into the pavement and leave you there unconscious in what sounds like an extremely unsafe culture.

Nobody is saying to not attempt to deter your attacker, but when he has already gotten his dick where he wants it, I do have to agree that at that point unless what you do to him is completely incapacitating(will knock him unconscious, is lethal, prevents him from moving to chase you) then it is indeed sad that your best course of action is to probably keep screaming and hope someone arrives to incapacitate him for you.

168

[quote]red04 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]debraD wrote:
I won’t for a second pretend to understand what it’s like to be in the shoes of a woman in the parts of the world where it is this bad but from my own perspective I’ll take a severe beating with the rapist’s dick damaged over a gentler beating and a rape ANYDAY.

It’s not really a matter of adding up pros and cons and taking a sum of gains and losses at the end of the day but it’s about inflicting suffering on a despicable being that deserves that and more.

I understand the logic and the sense about it potentially making things worse for the woman but if it’s my cunt I don’t care.

So with that perspective, I think the woman should have a choice of whether this is going to be their approach. If it were me and I take a beating, at least the guy isn’t going to be raping anyone ELSE soon. [/quote]

Yep. If this is a choice a woman wants to take then it should be allowed.

I don’t believe it will come here, this is a country that has allowed states to outlaw vibrators in 1998 because women were using it and ignoring their husbands, it was only 15yrs ago that it was made illegal for a man to rape his wife, and some states still require physical damage to press a charge of rape.

So they won’t make this legal.

But I agree with you debra. I fought back and I read your post that you did. I completely believe that my fighting back saved me from being raped by two men. I was beat badly but I wasn’t raped.

But all the guys who are saying don’t piss off your rapist, if you do go to prison, make that your motto.

and like someone else said, it sounds like South Africa is Thunderdome for these women. They can’t afford a gun, they can be just as over powered if they pull a knife and then be stabbed with the knife.

I don’t know what the solution is in South Africa but I understand what motivated the doctor.
[/quote]

You and Deb both say you fought back and that is what saved you from being raped. Are you just purposefully ignoring the part where for this device to activate, your fighting back was unsuccessful and you were in fact, raped(he achieved penetration). There is a monumental difference between ‘man attacks woman with intent to rape, is repelled because the effort required to remove her clothes and penetrate her is too much, she is attracting too much attention, etc’ and ‘man attacks woman with intent to rape, despite her struggle he is able to penetrate her before a device clamps on to his dick.’

This device does not ‘fight off’ the man until he has already completely dominated you and is clearly ignoring any screaming for attention you are doing. I can’t dispute with Lanky that we know for sure what his reaction would be, but I have an INCREDIBLY difficult time imagining that he won’t at the very least smash your face into the pavement and leave you there unconscious in what sounds like an extremely unsafe culture.

Nobody is saying to not attempt to deter your attacker, but when he has already gotten his dick where he wants it, I do have to agree that at that point unless what you do to him is completely incapacitating(will knock him unconscious, is lethal, prevents him from moving to chase you) then it is indeed sad that your best course of action is to probably keep screaming and hope someone arrives to incapacitate him for you.[/quote]

speaking for myself I was more of the opinion that it would be a woman’s choice whether or not to use the device.

I was also speaking in contrast to some posters who were saying that to make the rapist angry would be to ask for a worse beating or death. In my mind in that situation, I assumed I was going to be killed anyways, why not fight back?

I see what you are saying about this condom comes in to play at the point of penetration, but like debra said, well then maybe that rapist won’t ever be able to rape anyone else.

You probably haven’t been in that situation, but for me it was life or death in my mind. And from what I’ve read about South Africa, women are killed anyways. Their lives are not highly valued, not even by their own court system.

For all you men worried about revenge minded crazy girls, do you really see the patriarchal U.S. allowing this in and threatening your manhood?

169

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
I specifically said the rest of the CIVILIZED world. I dont consider any of those practices civilized even though they may happen in countries more civilized than South Africa, including the US. Perhaps I should have specifically said “civilized populations”.

I already said I’m not an anthropologist. I took two anthro classes in undergrad. I dont have an answer for that. But it sounds like youre implying that razor blades in a vagina is leading people down the path of civilization. That’s just not true. This is equivalent to Hannibal’s “eye for an eye” code.

What’s going to happen when a mother gets raped with one of these. But instead of just being raped (again, excuse the downplaying of the act) she is now killed by the rapist. Her children are now motherless instead of the still horrible alternative. There is so much that can go wrong with this “solution” Im amazed people think this will lead to any progress whatsoever. [/quote]

I don’t know that anyone said it would lead to civilizing South Africa.

Some of what I posted as crimes against women happen here in the U.S by the way.

Women are already raped and killed. Are you advocating women lay back and take it, is that what you would do?

I don’t know what the answer is, but I can certainly understand the outrage at a society like South Africa and the culture of abuse for women.
[/quote]

Are you reading my posts? Its not late at night where you are, what’s your excuse or are you just seeing what you want to see. PLease read my most recent post one more time. I said it sounds like you are IMPLYING that this will have positive effects on society (call that what you want, I’ll call it civilization).

Second. I clearly acknowledged that those practices happen in the US. I

Of course Im not advocating women accept rape as the norm. Are you serious with that question. It almost sounds like you are trolling at this point. My whole argument has been that this device will cause more harm than good over the long term. This device is reinforcing barbaric behavior. My opinion is that time and resoruces should be invested in finding ways to change the culture, not find a sophisticated way to put “barbs” in a rapist’s penis during the act.

Please dont make anymore nonsensical posts. I dont feel like insulting anyone personally to make my point so if you are going to ignore my actual words simply dont reply.
[/quote]

I have read your post fully. I don’t agree that my posts are nonsensical, you just don’t agree with my opinion or I am not making my point clear.

You said this would probably make the situation worse and the enraged rapist might then kill the woman. I said this happens anyways. It read to me that a woman shouldn’t be doing anything to anger her rapist. That was my point.

Another point I made is that there is no motivation for the country to change. The entire continent is in shambles. Look at Darfur.

So much aid already goes to South Africa both governmental and private. If it reads as if I know what the answer is, I hadn’t meant to imply that. I’m not trolling. But quite a few of the posts are coming across as if the woman shouldn’t make her rapist angry.

There is no need for personal insults.
[/quote]

What he is saying is that given the choice between a rape (an assault) or death, choose to be assaulted. To fight back is the natural thought response, but the reality is that you could be killed as a result of fighting. You are correct that you could be killed anyway and should go down fighting…as I said, rape is not necessarily a sex crime per se, but rather a violent crime of aggression to begin with. Given the pervasiveness of rape in that culture, I’d be interested to know the statistics relative to rapes that result in serious injury or death compared to the US where rape is obviously not tolerated. My gut tells me that the incidence of death in S. Africa would be lower. Again, education and enforcement are the only means I can see to bring them into civilization. Either that, or send me and some like minded men down there for the next ten years. Because if you raped a woman I know, you’re one dead motherfucker and I’m not calling 911.

170

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:

[quote]C-Bear wrote:
Most men who attack women let the victim’s fear do the work, and have little recourse against someone who has tools with which to respond, be they verbal or physical. Most men willing to rape a woman retreat when there’s difficulty or struggle because they depend on intimidation and are weak facing strength or assertiveness – which is why they’re rapists. [/quote]

Well said. Truth.
[/quote]

I think you’re poo pooing actual rape and confusing it with some date rape shit. A true rape attack is a violent crime from start to finish…it doesn’t start with heavy petting and a refusal to hear “no”. A woman was raped and killed on a city street blocks from where I’m sitting as I type this…she fought back too. Too bad her 18 year old attacker wasn’t relying on her fear and too bad he didn’t retreat when she flexed her “strength” or “asserted” herself. Too fucking bad indeed.

171

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

For all you men worried about revenge minded crazy girls, do you really see the patriarchal U.S. allowing this in and threatening your manhood?

[/quote]

Here we go again

172

[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

For all you men worried about revenge minded crazy girls, do you really see the patriarchal U.S. allowing this in and threatening your manhood?

[/quote]

Here we go again[/quote]

hahaha! okay okay okay, that might have been a bit slanted.

Let me say that I do not believe this would be an item available for legal sale in the U.S.

173

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:
Are you advocating women lay back and take it, is that what you would do?[/quote]

Where the hell are you reading this in peoples posts?[/quote]

Didn’t you say that inflicting pain on the rapist might make him angrier? Hitting him or knocking his head with a bottle might make him angrier, scratching him, might making him angrier, kicking and biting him might make him angrier.

So if a woman shouldn’t use this condom because the pain inflicted might make him angrier do you also advocate a woman not lash out and fight back against her rapist because it might make him angrier?

What would be your suggested level of resistance?

It isn’t a stretch.

And I’ve already covered all this in other posts.
[/quote]

I think a woman should resist if there is a reasonable chance that said resistance will be successful. We can QB this thing from a hypothetical all day long…and get nowhere. Fact is, there is no “right” answer here. A girl in this City a year or more ago jumped from a window, to her death, from an attacker in her apartment. Is that a reasonable response? Rape is terrible. Death more terrible. I sure don’t know the answer except that the whole thing is repugnant. Frankly, if I had a daughter, I don’t know what I’d tell her to do, except avoid dangerous situations and be careful. I couldn’t advise her to fight back for all she’s worth and I certainly couldn’t advocate to sit there and “take it”. The difficulty is a victim cannot know if she is merely fighting off an assault or an intended murder and, if fighting what started as an assault escalates it to a murder.

174

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
Seems to me like this thing is a necessary evil.

Having hooked barbs in my dick would make me think twice about raping someone else.[/quote]

Let’s try a simple thought experiment.

Rapist is in blinding pain and the source of said pain is in front of him. This particular rapist, like most if not all, is a violent individual.

Let’s imagine what the end result here will be.[/quote]

Let’s try another scenario, woman in a parking lot being attacked by two men, she hits one in the head with a bottle causing him to cry out and attract attention. She gets beaten, but the blow and the resultant cry of pain brings about the end of the attack. Was it worth inflicting the pain?
[/quote]

If you’re in a public setting, I advocate fighting with all your will. However, sadly, it didn’t work for the young lady is this city recently.

175

[quote]DickBag wrote:
Men get raped aswell, in the ass. so should I stick a rape axe up my ass? what if it feels good? Will i turn gay?

Also, howcome people don’t give as much sympathy to men who get raped up the ass, why is all the attention on babies and women?

wierd.

Rapists arn’t all bad either. Yes most of them are cunts, but there are good moral men who snap in life and rape. This happens because they snap, they are bogged down in negative thinking. Why punish with nifeing their penis? Is jail not enough? Is guilt, shame and so on not enough? Now we have to cut their dicks?

Fuckin bitches. Walkin around, showin their tits, and their ass, and acting like sluts, then some men get stupid and act on their violent sexual impulses and now we have this massive unnessesary mess.

All us men have impulses, but most of us control them. I see no need in this device, because it wont SELECTIVLY WORK. it will work on all rapists!! thats not a good idea, some good men rape aswell, just like some good men kill, some good men steal, some good men do bad things.

Thats life, real world is different than the ideal internet moral world.

good men and women do not deserve excessive punishment. A bit of punishment and understandning and reforming is all that is needed.

I agree that there are pricks out there that would deserve more punishment than others, but this product wont work only on them, and for that reason as well as a few others i think this product is stupid.

If they make this product then they better make one for men to, so we can stick them in our asses.

also i think that golddigger women should be punished for all the finanacial and mental rape they do.

[/quote]

I hope you are merely trolling or, if you’re not, that you consider psychological help. Although I can agree with your anger toward the system that favors women in marital dissolution, your just barely beneath the surface angry ideas about “impulses” is quite frightening. I’m a horny motherfucker with the hormones of a gang of 15 year old boys…but I never find myself needing to “control” these urges you speak of, other than refraining from fucking ugly bitches (probably physically impossible anyway for me) or fucking random hoes that may carry some disease. I have never seen a woman walk down the street half dressed and thought to myself, “oh man, I should just bum rush her into that dark alley, bend her over a trash can and have my way with her”. No, instead, my thought process is, “I’d like to hit that…but I wonder how many lovers she’s had, if the bitch has a job, is she an asshole, does she presently have a man…IS THIS WORTH THE TROUBLE OF TALKING TO HER”.

Your ideas are pretty fucking disturbing pal :slight_smile:

176

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]DickBag wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
Seems to me like this thing is a necessary evil.

Having hooked barbs in my dick would make me think twice about raping someone else.[/quote]

Let’s try a simple thought experiment.

Rapist is in blinding pain and the source of said pain is in front of him. This particular rapist, like most if not all, is a violent individual.

Let’s imagine what the end result here will be.[/quote]

Let’s try another scenario, woman in a parking lot being attacked by two men, she hits one in the head with a bottle causing him to cry out and attract attention. She gets beaten, but the blow and the resultant cry of pain brings about the end of the attack. Was it worth inflicting the pain?
[/quote]

hey october girl, how do you feel about brining in a new device that cuts a woman’s tits off whenever she decides to take the house, kids and half the man’s salary after using a man for his money and lieing to him about loving him

Would you be comfortable with that?

Women rape men also, just in a “mind game” kind of way. They take your money, house and kids, and your pride, aswell as act like your parent and controll your life and finances.

How about we design somethign that cuts these ladies tits off, ya know, because what those ladies are doing is barbaric, and mental pain is worse than physical pain.

I look forward to your reply[/quote]

Wow that was low and not the same thing at all

I was sexually assaulted, it is a mind fuck as well as physical and emotional battery, I know what I am talking about.

If you had actually read my posts you would know my opinion on the device asshole.

consider yourself ignored for being a dickbag.
[/quote]

Do you know who did it? I will happily fist fuck his throat for women everywhere.

177

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
Seems to me like this thing is a necessary evil.

Having hooked barbs in my dick would make me think twice about raping someone else.[/quote]

Let’s try a simple thought experiment.

Rapist is in blinding pain and the source of said pain is in front of him. This particular rapist, like most if not all, is a violent individual.

Let’s imagine what the end result here will be.[/quote]

Let’s try another scenario, woman in a parking lot being attacked by two men, she hits one in the head with a bottle causing him to cry out and attract attention. She gets beaten, but the blow and the resultant cry of pain brings about the end of the attack. Was it worth inflicting the pain?
[/quote]

If you’re in a public setting, I advocate fighting with all your will. However, sadly, it didn’t work for the young lady is this city recently.[/quote]

I appreciate your well thought post above and am responding to this one because that is what happened to me and fighting back was the answer.

As you mentioned in the above post there is a possibility that fighting back could escalate the violence to murder, but there is always that chance that was the intent of the rapist in the first place because as someone else mentioned, dead women don’t talk.

I’m in San Diego, I don’t know if you know about Chelsea King and Amber Dubois.

I’m probably getting repetitive.

178

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:

[quote]Deorum wrote:
Finally back to topic. I’m not going to make this complicated at all this time because we see where it went last time. If you want to resist rape, as this device clearly is aimed at doing, why not carry a gun instead? Will anybody honestly argue this device is more effect at deterring rape than a gun? I never said I did not like the intentions of the device it is just clear this device would be ineffective at defending a women.

Economics considered I would still value a $1 folding knife over this device. It is just not logical. What it does do, is give women a sense of justice. They get to hit the attacker where it hurts the most. That, however, isn’t going to save their life after they take a man’s prized possession. The entire device is just illogical. [/quote]

Why is it either/or? Obviously both would be best.

But the majority of women in S. Africa are extremely poor and can’t afford a firearm.
[/quote]

It’s either/or because the device is very likely to introduce rage into an already aggressive scenario. Do you honestly believer a would be rapist in S. Africa is merely going to retreat b/c you set hooks into his ding ding? What if it’s a gang rape? What if he checks first? Don’t think the sponge/razor trick is known? Do you think this new device is a secret? Knowing it isn’t and won’t be a secret, don’t ya think a would be rapist might “put his toe in the water” before jumping in? I see the device as having very limited value. I favor a weapon capable of incapacitating an attacker - that’s what I would recommend to a loved one. Whether that be a well placed knife, stun gun, sharp object, pepper spray, whatever…it’s better than the dick trap in my opinion.

179

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Why does all this have to be so complicated? Why did I just have to explain myself like this?[/quote]

The problem is that all of you pro-rapists (satire) are writing as if this device shouldn’t even be available. As if there is no conclusion other than all would be rape victims being killed.

180

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]Deorum wrote:
I am still saying impaling a man’s dick is going to do nothing to help a women. This seems like a pride thing for women, to know that they can reciprocate the pain the man wants to inflict on them. I’m still saying that once a man’s dick is impaled that women is 100x more likely to die as a result of the attempted rape.[/quote]

In case you haven’t noticed, no one cares what you say, you stupid fuck.
[/quote]

This is what I hate about the internet. Why does a difference of opinion, even pointed barbs, result in this? Do you talk like this in person? I’m calling you out, b/c you have talked to me in the past in a similar fashion…and as you know, we’re neighbors. I’m in PA now. When it comes to personal insults and such, I think it should be delivered in person. Call me crazy. There is no honor to lobbing such grenades over the safety of the internet.