Pussification of Men and Violent Women

Off Topic
121

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Specific example, St. Christopher reported to be around 7 feet tall, carried people across a river that was as high as his chest with fast currents, he carried two to three at time. Tell me that dude is the go with the flow “meek” of today.[/quote]

I’m sure that’s not embellished in the slightest either.[/quote]

Any story teller worth his salt puts a little flair to his stories. [/quote]

never let the truth get in the way of a good story right?[/quote]

Said a little flair, not lie. He probably wasn’t 7 feet tall but that really doesn’t matter to the over all story, and he probably carried one to two people at a time, which is still impressive. But the fact remains he carried Jesus over the river.

122

[quote]gregron wrote:
never let the truth get in the way of a good story right?[/quote]

Haterz gonna hate!

123

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Specific example, St. Christopher reported to be around 7 feet tall, carried people across a river that was as high as his chest with fast currents, he carried two to three at time. Tell me that dude is the go with the flow “meek” of today.[/quote]

I’m sure that’s not embellished in the slightest either.[/quote]

Any story teller worth his salt puts a little flair to his stories. [/quote]

HA! Fair enough.[/quote]

Relly O Hooligan?

I just need to know so I can tell everyone else. And I will.

yep.

124

ok i’m going through some shit right now, so pre-worned. and been drinkin’. ok my thoughts, women should be by their man, come from our rib for christ sakes. well if you dont believe that then we have a dick and they have the vagina which it fits in. oh man i am fucked on t his one. ok women started getting power(money, jobs, social status) when they should be by their man. when i love a woman i would die for her, honestly die for her, if there was a situation where our life was on the line i would claaw, scratch, bite, stab, and shoot a motherfucker before i let him hurt MY wpman.

now being a divorsed dad of a daughrt i feel the same way to her but only more intense. if a man puts his hands on her(no matter what the senario is…she could kill his dog, rabit, or hamster) i dontgive a fuck! if a man or boy or woman for that matter if anyone ever put their haands on my daughtr in a violent way, i will fuck them up and probably kill them. same as my woman. i am pretty sure my daughter already knows this even though i have never told her that. i think she relizes i would die for her in a heart beat just like i would for my lover.

so here is the deal…oh man i am in touble, but have to say it. women know they have a man somewhere in their life that would honestly die for them, they know that it doesnt matter what they do, that 1 man at least has their back no-matter what. i think a woman should have her freedom in a way, but i think she should also be her man’s woman when she finds the one she loves. i mean when there is love between a woman and a man she should treat him as if he is her master in a way…he should never hurt her and protect her with his life…she should 100% know in her heart that her man will die for her, and in return give her entire body, mind, and soul to that man she loves therefor making her HIS WOMAN.

i am sorry if i offened any women on this site, but it is T-Nation and i believe women should be their man’s woman, and man should protect and provide for his lover, even if it means giving up his own life.

125

Puppies and kittens, hold one. You’ll feel less like punching someone.

126

damn it you are right! can i delete that?

127

[quote]mbdix wrote:
damn it you are right! can i delete that?[/quote]

Click on the report post and ask the mods to delete if you want. Ask BC to delete his quote too.

Honestly, all that romantic love stuff you’re talking about doesn’t have to have anything to do with gender power struggles and all of that.

Everyone would be better off if people who are together in one form or another are there because they WANT to be together, not because the NEED to for financial, baby caring, cooking or other reasons. That is when everything goes to shit.

128

[quote]Yo Momma wrote:
Violence against anyone is unnecessary if you have intelligence.[/quote]

I think this is a good point. Both of my past two ex gf’s were not very good communicators or very well educated. I wouldn’t go so far as to say they were dumb, but they definitely had a hard time arguing intelligently on their positions…as a result, they would resort to violence when they couldn’t sway me to their position and get me to do what they willed.

I hope I don’t come off as wimpy to anyone; but I refuse to go to jail to protect my ego. Also with my considerable size advantage over just about any woman and most men, I know I could hurt someone badly if I lose my temper…so I don’t.

Lucky for me I found a great way to not be a punching bag or target for things thrown while still putting them in their place with no damage. A quick take down followed up with a cross-face cradle. A move I learned in wrestling. You hook a knee and put one arm behind the neck then cinch it up tight until they are eating their knees and struggling to breathe. In less than a minute all the fight was out of them and I could release the hold.

Thankfully, I’ve found a wonderful woman who I believe will never raise a hand to me like those former girlfriends.

129

Gender confusion is the goal of our elites. Lean hungry male warriors…who wants people like that?

Why are there fast food joints everywhere? Fat jolly people are easier to rule.

130

i didnt think i was being romatic Deb,and I think it does have to do with the problem. a lot of women know they have men in their lives that would hurt someone if they touched them regardless of how wrong she might have been. the fact is my woman, or daughter could not do anything that would let me sit back and have another man hurt her, no matter what she did.

not that i am some badass that can kick peoples ass all over the place, but i would rather go home fucked up rather then my woman, or daughter getting touched. i dont know if i am making my point. i feel it contributes to some women feeling they can do what ever they want because they know that there is a man around that will protect them or at least take the ass whoopen for them. to prove my point of not being romantic, i think a woman’s place is by her man, and under his sheets. fucking him

131

but you are right only if she WANTS to be His Woman.

132

Ambiguous gender roles. Women wanted to be regarded as equals but still put on a pedestal. Examples: Women want to be regarded as just as smart, confident, strong, assertive, and capable as men in all areas, but at the same time expect men to open doors for them, pay for meals, make the first move, buy engagement rings, etc. In other words, modern American women demand that they get to eat their cake and have it to. And our culture–afraid of being labeled misogynists–has backed their play all the way.

Since women have basically gotten all they wanted and more in terms of social status, should we be surprised that some women are now so emboldened that they will not hesitate to physically assault a man? Just like women are regarded as “equals” even though men are expected to open their doors for them, why would women not expect that they can get away with hitting a dude and not getting hit back?

If you can’t tell, I take umbrage with this entire notion. The idea of opening doors for women, not hitting them, etc. is built on the notion that women are not only physically inferior to men, but also more “dainty” in their disposition. Frankly, that notion is shattered the moment a woman spits in my face or pours a drink on my head. The social contract is broken, bitch, and now you’re gonna get your teeth knocked out. Act like a man, get treated like a man. This is the definition of fair.

133

[quote]debraD wrote:
Unconstrained by societal rules, we are all violent and we are more alike than different.

And there are ‘pussies’ everywhere.[/quote]

Uh yeah, mother nature gave us inherent violent, angry, and aggressive streaks for survivial- streaks that are less useful in modern society than they were hundreds - and maybe even some decades - ago.

However, what’s your point in this context?

134

[quote]Sarev0k wrote:

[quote]dianab wrote:

[quote]Sarev0k wrote:

[quote]dianab wrote:
I have never seen this type of behavior from women (punching guys etc). Not in clubs, anywhere.
it’s wrong to hit anyone, unless you have to defend yourself from harm. (I think that was the point of the other thread, regardless of the attackers gender).
I’m not seeing that men are big pussies either. I mean some are and some aren’t, but I’m not seeing an epidemic or anything.[/quote]

You should take a trip to New York haha[/quote]

I live about an hour away LOL.
But really, I work with a lot of gay guys, some are flaming so much it hurts my eyes, but this is the extent of unmanliness I see.
There are some douchebags in my gym but they are all like 15, the rest of the guys there look pretty masculine to me.
I just don’t see it, maybe this is more prevalent in the states?[/quote]

I mean the city, if you want to see the full frontal pussification of men and angry women, indeed, it is in Manhattan.

They sell leashes for men at costco!
[/quote]

I live in Queens, 20 minutes from Manhattan, and even less travel time away from neighborhoods filled with anything but pussies. Even in my tree-lined, middle-class town of Bayside, although having some sedate and dull men, there is no shortage of cops, firemen, and former badboys and brawlers that won’t hesitate to stand up for themselves.

I don’t see how Manhattan is home to a large amount of pussies considering that Manhattan is home to industries (finance, medicine, academia, advertising, PR, journalism, marketing) in which laziness, indecisiveness, and timidness are especially detrimental to success. Are you referring to pussies in a romantic sense? I’ve seldom seen men who run shit in the work place but lay back in in their romantic and social lives. Actually, most of the men I know who are particularly cunning (and even in some cases low level psychopathic) sought to move to and/or attend school in Manhattan to use those traits to the full extent.

I know you’re speaking in general terms, but it also depends on what neighborhoods in Manhattan. Not too many pussies in Washington Heights.

And most don’t care how big someone’s muscles and bench are. :slight_smile:

135

[quote]Yo Momma wrote:
Violence against anyone is unnecessary if you have intelligence.[/quote]

Uh, it’s actually necessary in self defense, warfare, and law enforcement.

136

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:

[quote]Yo Momma wrote:
Violence against anyone is unnecessary if you have intelligence.[/quote]

Uh, it’s actually necessary in self defense, warfare, and law enforcement. [/quote]

We already clarified this point earlier in this thread.
Another example of our failed literacy education.

137

“Maybe you should talk to some of your fellow T-vixens in the Toronto area. They have complained about the lack of manly men in their areas in the past.”

Not all of us men are manly enough to be part of The Learned Elders of T-Nation.

138

[quote]Yo Momma wrote:

[quote]Bricknyce wrote:

[quote]Yo Momma wrote:
Violence against anyone is unnecessary if you have intelligence.[/quote]

Uh, it’s actually necessary in self defense, warfare, and law enforcement. [/quote]

We already clarified this point earlier in this thread.
Another example of our failed literacy education.[/quote]

More like me not reading every post.

139

If we only just fought less and fucked more…

140

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
If we only just fought less and fucked more…[/quote]

LOL!

End 'o thread!