[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Take responsibility and defend YOUR OWN FUCKING SELVES!! you whiney, lazy, sniveling, testosterone lacking weaklings!!
Don’t allow your government to murder people on the other side of the world in the name of “democracy and freedom”. The US doesn’t have a leg to stand on when it comes to freedom anymore. That ship has sailed.
We are all slaves here.
The difference is I do not bow to the false god “democracy”.
… then go live somewhere else.
According you your anarchist beliefs, the man had the right to impose what he deemed a just response. Who are you to judge that decisions he made on his own whether here or abroad were “bad”?
You don’t have the right to impose your will and morals on his actions and life. It’s like you are trying to govern and control other people.
I can live anywhere I want. That is the thing about being an anarchist. We don’t have to give into some false notions of nationality. Also what does it say about where one lives if one has to flee his government?
Nor do I impose anything on anyone. I certainly don’t make you do or believe anything that you don’t want to – that is all on you and your imagination. I am subject to the rules that govern private property here on T-Nation just like any other member. If I am allowed to express my opinions it is because the owners of this site graciously let me. That is real freedom right there. Not some nationalistically driven bullshit lie.
I care neither about the man nor the dog in this “news” story. I just thought it was ironic.[/quote]
First, you’re at best cold in you statement. Would you not care if it was his actual daughter they killed?
I’m just pointing out that as an anarchist it’s pretty useless to have opinions on anything outside of your own body because your political belief forbids external intervention in situations. Essentially, “you shouldn’t kill your neighbor’s dog, but if you do, it’s none of my business.”
Why may I ask do you not care about an innocent animal being executed, but apparently care so much about willing participants in a conflict between opposing groups being killed thousands of miles away. Isn’t the animal living completely by anarchist ideals? For some reason are the “terrorists in the hills” more deserving of your sympathy? If the soldier is guilty than certainly the guys they are fighting are too. So, why are you so defensive about their “murder”?
In the very basic scheme of it the soldier is doing what he thinks best for him and his under the circumstances he is in. Why do you think that is wrong? Should we try to stop him from doing what he thinks best? If not, then why accuse someone of murder if you don’t think anything should be done about it. If you do think something should be done and individual soldiers should be forcibly stopped, then you aren’t an anarchist.
I used to consider myself anarchist, until I realized that having an opinion under those beliefs is a self-defeating argument.