I’ve been seeing a slow growth of old threads appearing. Most recently, a thread about “Best Books” in the Training forum.
“So, what’s the problem with that? Someone might find this thread useful…” you ask/say. This most recent thread is from the year 2000. If a search was performed, someone could have found much more recent threads about the very same topic. As well as discussions regarding Mel Siff (which seemed to have piqued the person responsible’s interest).
If you’re performing searches and finding threads that interest you, but are OLD…really, really OLD…then maybe you should consider perusing the info w/out bringing that thread back up. Or begin a new thread if the information provided may be in need of updating.
This is just a bout of common sense and not meant in any way as a flame.
I’ve started threads before and got flamed because there were previous threads about the same topic. I always search before I start a new thread to make sure my question wasn’t already answered. But if I find an old thread on the smae topic, but my specific question wasn’t answered, I’ll bump the thread with my question (ie. the liniment thread).
Patricia, would you say I’d be better to start a new thread if the one of the same topic is too old?
Patricia I don’t mind old thread being pulled back up I do mind old pics that are brought back from the dead… Like Ron Harris’ pic. Did that really need to be brought back to life?