[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
What I believe, even in the details, was the prevailing view of this nation at her founding. [/quote]
My views were the prevailing view of Church when jesus founded the Church, and except for a few exceptions always has been the prevailing views of the Church that was founded by Jesus.
.[/quote]
I think there is a picture of that somewhere.
Anyhow, as far as we can tell Jesus despised Jewish organized religion and ran into them head first on a number of occasions.
I find it very hard to believe that he would have felt anything different for the Catholic Church. [/quote]
Documentation? [/quote]
You mean like whipping the money changers out of the temple and pointing out the hypocrisy of the pharisees with the whole “give unto Caesar” spiel was not enough?
[/quote]
I didn’t know that money changers and hypocrites were a religion. Thanks for informing me. But, please I would still like documentation that Jesus despised Jewish organized religion. Sounds like Nazi hate speech actually.
[quote]
What would the very same man have thought of the inquisition, the tithes, the Borgia popes, witch burnings, indulgences, the crusades and so further and so on.[/quote]
Inquisition = Government shouldn’t kill heretics.
Tithes = Jesus took and paid tithes (actually commanded them in the OT).
Borgia Popes = Sinners, scandalous.
Witch Burning = Believing in witches is heresy.
Indulgences = Shouldn’t pay for them, but they are part of the deposit of faith.
Crusades = Just war at beginning (after all they are a reaction from Muslims attacking Christians), corrupted by personal greed and pride later.
These are all the positions of the Church as well, because it is the body of Christ protected by infallibility. :)[/quote]
Yeah well, he would have loved that to.
The whole infallibility shtick.
Does not help your argument though, it has not been around long enough.
Also, moneylenders and hypocrites are not a religion, they just thrive on organized religion. Not that money lending is in an of itself bad, but selling coins with an outrageous profit just because they have no picture of Caesar on it so that you can give it to the Temple is, like, not good, and very organized religion.
No, they should not, but the have, commanded by the CC.
Now way, he was not around in the OT. Also, new covenant and whatnot.
Yes, popes still.
Burned still, by the church of Christ. Allegedly. The allegedly part does not refer to the witch burnings. Those happened.
Should we not? How else to finance the whoring of cardinals?
Highly questionable under the just war doctrine, unless the Pope was the rightful, ordained worldly leader of all of Christendom and not even they did ever claim that. Besides, the just war doctrine is just that, a doctrine, meaning, rules made up by men.