President Obama

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
101

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Ha ha you’re a funny little man.
[/quote]
[/quote]

he must disagree with you
[/quote]

Did you read what he wrote? Did you see him challenge me to repeat what he wrote? Did you then see his response to what I posted?

Hell no…you don’t even know how to work the quote function half the time. The only way you can continue to post after being owned by just about everyone on the board who has ever taken an opposing position is because you are one very dumb bastard!

102

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Ha ha you’re a funny little man.
[/quote]
[/quote]

he must disagree with you
[/quote]

Did you read what he wrote? Did you see him challenge me to repeat what he wrote? Did you then see his response to what I posted?

Hell no…you don’t even know how to work the quote function half the time. The only way you can continue to post after being owned by just about everyone on the board who has ever taken an opposing position is because you are one very dumb bastard!

[/quote]

You don’t know how to Read ZEB. You are just making shit up. My comment does not directly or indirectly suggest that minorities are stupid. I give the reader the impression that the new rule makes things more complicated, but not impossible, for some people to vote. I also support the conclusion that photo ID is an eventual ideal. I believe that the Republicans who passed this piece of legislature did so with that as a pretext, but with the true agenda being to undermine Democrat voters.

I am trying to clarify my statement for you because you just labelled me something that I do not stand for. I am really angry that you persist in misinterpreting my comment. But I realise that I can’t really do anything about your inability to argue a point with facts, and your insistence on using logical fallacies and personal attacks as a basis for your arguement.

That’s the main reason I don’t want to continue this line of discussion. Because you’re a big, tough, super clever Troll and I don’t think I can defeat your big, tough, super clever Troll wit. Oh well, that’s the interwebs!

103

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Did you read what he wrote?
[/quote]

who fucking cares you handle ALL DISSENTERS the same

104

[quote]Pigeonkak wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Ha ha you’re a funny little man.
[/quote]
[/quote]

he must disagree with you
[/quote]

Did you read what he wrote? Did you see him challenge me to repeat what he wrote? Did you then see his response to what I posted?

Hell no…you don’t even know how to work the quote function half the time. The only way you can continue to post after being owned by just about everyone on the board who has ever taken an opposing position is because you are one very dumb bastard!

[/quote]

You don’t know how to Read ZEB. You are just making shit up. My comment does not directly or indirectly suggest that minorities are stupid. I give the reader the impression that the new rule makes things more complicated, but not impossible, for some people to vote. I also support the conclusion that photo ID is an eventual ideal. I believe that the Republicans who passed this piece of legislature did so with that as a pretext, but with the true agenda being to undermine Democrat voters.

I am trying to clarify my statement for you because you just labelled me something that I do not stand for. I am really angry that you persist in misinterpreting my comment. But I realise that I can’t really do anything about your inability to argue a point with facts, and your insistence on using logical fallacies and personal attacks as a basis for your arguement.

That’s the main reason I don’t want to continue this line of discussion. Because you’re a big, tough, super clever Troll and I don’t think I can defeat your big, tough, super clever Troll wit. Oh well, that’s the interwebs!
[/quote]

Here is a fact for you, you said:

[quote]Pigeonkak wrote:
But my immediate and main objection to the ID rule is not that it makes it absolutely impossible for these people to vote, but rather that it seems a loaded piece of legislature aimed at making it that much harder for Democrats to vote. Assuming you trust the figures presenting all these Hispanics, minorities and other groups as largely Democrat. I do believe they tend to Obama…[/quote]

Once again anyone reading the above can only conclude one thing. You assume minorities are not bright or ambitious enough to obtain an ID card. There is no other way to interpret your nasty little paragraph.

Simple.

You can rant and rave and name call all you want. Some on the left on this board wonder why the right dominates. YOU are a very good example of what happens to many from the left who wonder in here espousing their liberal beliefs. You mouth off, get put in your place and have to eat crow. Some crawl away never to return. Others hit and run. And some who are just plain too stupid to get it keep posting.

But you can worm and you can wiggle but you you cannot interpret your racist comments any other way. Gee…and it seemed like such a good thing to say when your hero’s on MSNBC said it huh?

Don’t like it do you?

Tough shit Sparky!

105

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Did you read what he wrote?
[/quote]

who fucking cares you handle ALL DISSENTERS the same
[/quote]

No, actually I hold a special place for the truly dumb.

106

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Did you read what he wrote?
[/quote]

who fucking cares you handle ALL DISSENTERS the same
[/quote]

No, actually I hold a special place for the truly dumb.[/quote]
Narcism at it’s best

107

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Did you read what he wrote?
[/quote]

who fucking cares you handle ALL DISSENTERS the same
[/quote]

No, actually I hold a special place for the truly dumb.[/quote]
Narcism at it’s best [/quote]

You mean “Narcissism” go have another joint Pittski, it’s helped you so much.

108
109

LOL

110
111
112

[quote]ZEB wrote:

more of the best of narcism

113

LOL…you can have the last word Pittski. I know how it tends to make your day.

115

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Did you read what he wrote?
[/quote]

who fucking cares you handle ALL DISSENTERS the same
[/quote]

No, actually I hold a special place for the truly dumb.[/quote]
Narcism at it’s best [/quote]

You mean “Narcissism” go have another joint Pittski, it’s helped you so much.
[/quote]

I think Pitbull has hit the nail on its head. You don’t like being disagreed with, but you clearly take great joy in your own opinions. And when you can’t argue a point eloquently or otherwise you just deride and dismiss your opponents. That’s cool. Hope it has worked out for you all this time. Actually, why am I surprised? You support Mitt Romney.

116

[quote]Pigeonkak wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Did you read what he wrote?
[/quote]

who fucking cares you handle ALL DISSENTERS the same
[/quote]

No, actually I hold a special place for the truly dumb.[/quote]
Narcism at it’s best [/quote]

You mean “Narcissism” go have another joint Pittski, it’s helped you so much.
[/quote]

I think Pitbull has hit the nail on its head. You don’t like being disagreed with, but you clearly take great joy in your own opinions. And when you can’t argue a point eloquently or otherwise you just deride and dismiss your opponents. That’s cool. Hope it has worked out for you all this time. Actually, why am I surprised? You support Mitt Romney.
[/quote]

Gee now why would you agree with Pittbull?

Hey I know!

It’s because I proved your wrong and there was no way to talk yourself out of it.

Would you like me to post your racist statements involving your lack of faith with the typical democratic voter?

Ha, You won’t be saying that again will you Skippy?

You’re pretty typical of the Obama entitlement voter.

Run along I’m done with you now.

117

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Pigeonkak wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]pittbulll wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

Did you read what he wrote?
[/quote]

who fucking cares you handle ALL DISSENTERS the same
[/quote]

No, actually I hold a special place for the truly dumb.[/quote]
Narcism at it’s best [/quote]

You mean “Narcissism” go have another joint Pittski, it’s helped you so much.
[/quote]

I think Pitbull has hit the nail on its head. You don’t like being disagreed with, but you clearly take great joy in your own opinions. And when you can’t argue a point eloquently or otherwise you just deride and dismiss your opponents. That’s cool. Hope it has worked out for you all this time. Actually, why am I surprised? You support Mitt Romney.
[/quote]

Gee now why would you agree with Pittbull?

Hey I know!

It’s because I proved your wrong and there was no way to talk yourself out of it.

Would you like me to post your racist statements involving your lack of faith with the typical democratic voter?

Ha, You won’t be saying that again will you Skippy?

You’re pretty typical of the Obama entitlement voter.

Run along I’m done with you now.[/quote]

No, you’re not done with me. You accused me of racism by taking something I said and twisted it around a meaning that suited you. This discussion wasn’t actually about race per se except in how Republican driven legislature would affect certain minorities. But you wouldn’t stop with the Ad Hominem, non fact, libelous name calling and you suddenly turned this thread into “Pigeonkak is a racist”. I’m going to assume you don’t care how angry that makes me. But I realise there is absolutely nothing I can do about you being ignorant of your histrionic, all-knowing, disingenuous attitude towards things you disagree with.

I also sense that you called me a racist because inside you’re a bigot. The Merriam-Webster you so devoutly quote to burn Pitbull reinforces my belief in this:

Bigot: “a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially: one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance”

And if you are a bigot, but persist in declaring other people racist, then doesn’t that make you a:

Your arguement is flawed, misdirecting and intentionally dishonest. I don’t need to prove my own innocence. You need to get better at reading other people’s opinions without flipping out and spitting venom.

118

[quote]Pigeonkak wrote:
except in how Republican driven legislature would affect certain minorities.
[/quote]

Didn’t you earlier say that it is unfair for everyone? (Therefore making it fair but we’ll ignore that part I guess.)

How does an ID law affect minorities any more than majorities?

119

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]Pigeonkak wrote:
except in how Republican driven legislature would affect certain minorities.
[/quote]

Didn’t you earlier say that it is unfair for everyone? (Therefore making it fair but we’ll ignore that part I guess.)

How does an ID law affect minorities any more than majorities?[/quote]

You make a good point. I appreciate that at this time the specific voter ID law we’re referring to isn’t undermining the majority. I was speaking to the precedent being set by implementing laws just to gain political leverage for elections. And this is a crime committed by republicans and democrats alike. I’ve seen it happen enough in the various countries I have lived and worked in but especially back home in South Africa. The principles of democracy begin eroding if big wigs change laws just for political upper hand.

120

[quote]Pigeonkak wrote:
I was speaking to the precedent being set by implementing laws just to gain political leverage for elections. [/quote]

How does proving you are who you say you are, having an ID, fit what you are describing here?

How does a voter ID law gain political leverage for anyone?

Well, be thankful America is a Republic then.