This is absolutely futile.
There are, effectively, two kinds of fat: subcutaneous and visceral. They BOTH contribute to bodyfat percentage, but the latter can NOT be seen from the outside. It’s fat between your organs. You can have two dudes that look the same degree of “ripped”, but have wildly different numbers because one dude has more visceral fat than the other.
You’ll look exactly how fat you look irrespective of what that number is. If you want to know an actual number for gee wiz sacks, a DEXA scan is your best bet, and even THAT has a margin of error. Ultimately, autopsy is the only real way to “know”.
Someone like @s.gentz or @RT_Nomad could give you a much more meaningful evaluation of how many “weeks out” you are from a certain degree of leanness based on your current state.
So on this topic, Dr. Ted Naiman has an awesome theory that I ascribe to. Dr. Paul Saladino has also expressed a similar sentiment. It’s based on the notion that our bodies hunger for protein and nutrients: NOT energy. That is to say: we’re not eating for CALORIES, we’re eating for protein and micronutrients. Therefore, if we want to “beat” hunger, we do so by eating protein and nutrient dense foods such that we DON’T need to eat a lot of calories to get there.
Simple example: a twinkie. They have 1 gram of protein each. If you wanted to hit a target goal of 200g of protein a day, you’d have to eat 200 of them to get there. Given that 1 twinkie ALSO has 140 calories because of the 23g of carbs and 5g of fat, you’d end up taking in 28,000 calories to get your protein goal. Compare this to a piedmontese grassfed ribeye, which is like 140 calories per 26g of protein, you’d only need to eat 1075 calories worth of steak to get to your protein goal. And if you ate a little less steak and a few more eggs and liver, you’d get the nutrients your body is hungry for, and most likely “shut off” hunger.
It’s why obesity is a disease of MALnutrition these days. Most folks are eating such nutrient VOID “foods” that they have to eat SO much of it in order to satiate their body’s nutrient hunger, whereas if they ate whole foods that are nutrient and protein rich, they’d require far less. But THOSE foods aren’t shelf stable and are expensive for junk food manufacturers to produce, and ALSO aren’t addictive and have a low return on investment, so they don’t bother selling them.