Pot Causes Cancer?

Looks like it does. I am pro legalization but let’s not pretend there are no health risks.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080129/hl_nm/cancer_cannabis_dc

Cannabis bigger cancer risk than cigarettes: study Tue Jan 29, 4:44 AM ET

Smoking a joint is equivalent to 20 cigarettes in terms of lung cancer risk, scientists in New Zealand have found, as they warned of an “epidemic” of lung cancers linked to cannabis.

Studies in the past have demonstrated that cannabis can cause cancer, but few have established a strong link between cannabis use and the actual incidence of lung cancer.

In an article published in the European Respiratory Journal, the scientists said cannabis could be expected to harm the airways more than tobacco as its smoke contained twice the level of carcinogens, such as polyaromatic hydrocarbons, compared with tobacco cigarettes.

The method of smoking also increases the risk, since joints are typically smoked without a proper filter and almost to the very tip, which increases the amount of smoke inhaled. The cannabis smoker inhales more deeply and for longer, facilitating the deposition of carcinogens in the airways.

“Cannabis smokers end up with five times more carbon monoxide in their bloodstream (than tobacco smokers),” team leader Richard Beasley, at the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, said in a telephone interview.

“There are higher concentrations of carcinogens in cannabis smoke … what is intriguing to us is there is so little work done on cannabis when there is so much done on tobacco.”

The researchers interviewed 79 lung cancer patients and sought to identify the main risk factors for the disease, such as smoking, family history and occupation. The patients were questioned about alcohol and cannabis consumption.

In this high-exposure group, lung cancer risk rose by 5.7 times for patients who smoked more than a joint a day for 10 years, or two joints a day for 5 years, after adjusting for other variables, including cigarette smoking.

“While our study covers a relatively small group, it shows clearly that long-term cannabis smoking increases lung cancer risk,” wrote Beaseley.

“Cannabis use could already be responsible for one in 20 lung cancers diagnosed in New Zealand,” he added.

“In the near future we may see an ‘epidemic’ of lung cancers connected with this new carcinogen. And the future risk probably applies to many other countries, where increasing use of cannabis among young adults and adolescents is becoming a major public health problem.”

I posted this:[quote]Forensic Drug Abuse Advisor, 18(6):45-46, 2006) It is now believed that THC in marijuana and nicotine in tobacco counteract each other. THC apparently blocks enzymes that promote cancer development decreasing the effects of free radicals from nicotine use.[/quote]

from this discussion previously:
http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=1389506&pageNo=1

It really makes me wonder, with tests and studies showing such radically different results, which perspective is correct.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I posted this:Forensic Drug Abuse Advisor, 18(6):45-46, 2006) It is now believed that THC in marijuana and nicotine in tobacco counteract each other. THC apparently blocks enzymes that promote cancer development decreasing the effects of free radicals from nicotine use.

from this discussion previously:
http://www.T-Nation.com/tmagnum/readTopic.do?id=1389506&pageNo=1

It really makes me wonder, with tests and studies showing such radically different results, which perspective is correct.[/quote]

I remember that and found it hard to believe that it could prevent cancer.

It seems everything causes cancer. Still this doesn’t look good for those that are heavy pot smokers.

Meh.

http://www.thevolcanovaporizer.com/index.php

In today’s day and age, you can find “studies” that will support every angle of any topic. For each article that tells you one thing, you can find another that tells you the complete opposite.

It makes sense if you Over indulge that it will have some negative effects

I wouldn’t be surprised in the least if pot smoke caused cancer. In this way it at least has parity with cigarette smoking. The flipside is that most pot smokers don’t smoke nearly as often as cigarette smokers do, wake-and-bakers excepted.

That said, this shouldn’t be a barrier to legalization anyway as cigarettes have proven cancer risks, and they are legal.

Whatever. In a few years we’ll find out coffee causes cancer. Then soon after we’ll find out water gives us cancer.

Like previously said… smoking a joint once a week (20 cigs) is still much better than a chain smoker smoking at least 3 cigs a day.

Whatever. We’re all gonna die anyway, might as well enjoy it.

Whats that saying? Everything in moderation…

This just in:

Birth, #1 cause of cancer.

There is no prevention, there is no cure…you’re only gonna die!

I don’t know what to believe. I don’t think it’s clear yet. But this is one study. Most credible studies I’ve seen suggest that pot does not promote cancer, though of course it does damage lung function and does increase the risk of emphysema. Any time you have smoke in your lungs, that’s going to damage lung function.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
Smoking a joint is equivalent to 20 cigarettes in terms of lung cancer risk, scientists in New Zealand have found, as they warned of an “epidemic” of lung cancers linked to cannabis.[/quote]

But what if I only use a bucket bong?

[quote]jsbrook wrote:
I don’t know what to believe. I don’t think it’s clear yet. But this is one study. Most credible studies I’ve seen suggest that pot does not promote cancer, though of course it does damage lung function and does increase the risk of emphysema. Any time you have smoke in your lungs, that’s going to damage lung function.[/quote]

Most studies I’ve read have stated the same which is why I don’t give much credit to one study that comes along claiming it is worse than cigarettes in that department. I am also wondering why this study gets in the papers while the others didn’t.

I actually know why but I like to pretend like I didn’t see it coming.

Yeah, we all know why.

I remain hopeful for the day that I may be able to purchase el primo grade weed from a shop.

I may be over 50 by the time it happens, but jeez I hope it happens.

Rediculous world we live in where it’s classed with ice and cocaine.

So the study had a sample size of 79 lung cancer patients.

I find it difficult to comprehend how they can calculate precise figures such as “Smoking a joint is equivalent to 20 cigarettes in terms of lung cancer risk” from such a small sample size.

[quote]Sxio wrote:
Yeah, we all know why.

I remain hopeful for the day that I may be able to purchase el primo grade weed from a shop.

I may be over 50 by the time it happens, but jeez I hope it happens.

Rediculous world we live in where it’s classed with ice and cocaine. [/quote]

Yep, it is quite ridiculous

http://www.nida.nih.gov/ResearchReports/Marijuana/Marijuana2.html

“More than 94 million Americans (40 percent) age 12 and older have tried marijuana at least once, according to the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)”

The figure in Australia is also around 40 percent. Prohibition obviously is not working so hopefully politicians will eventually realize how illogical it is to attempt to ban a plant species.

[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:
Sxio wrote:
Yeah, we all know why.

I remain hopeful for the day that I may be able to purchase el primo grade weed from a shop.

I may be over 50 by the time it happens, but jeez I hope it happens.

Rediculous world we live in where it’s classed with ice and cocaine.

Yep, it is quite ridiculous

http://www.nida.nih.gov/ResearchReports/Marijuana/Marijuana2.html

“More than 94 million Americans (40 percent) age 12 and older have tried marijuana at least once, according to the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)”

The figure in Australia is also around 40 percent. Prohibition obviously is not working so hopefully politicians will eventually realize how illogical it is to attempt to ban a plant species.

[/quote]

I wish they would ban dandelions so I wouldn’t have to deal with them every year.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
I wish they would ban dandelions so I wouldn’t have to deal with them every year.
[/quote]

They might, but just wait til you get busted for possession with intent to distribute…

[quote]Sxio wrote:
But what if I only use a bucket bong?

[/quote]

I guess water is a pretty good filter.

[quote]lixy wrote:
Meh.

http://www.thevolcanovaporizer.com/index.php[/quote]

Right on.

They base their study upon at least a joint a day for ten years. With good chronic two tokes should be able to get you stoned for quite a while, especially if you use a bong.