Poll Shows Bush Losing Ground...

Poll Shows Bush Losing Ground on Anti-Terror Policy.

By Gary Langer, ABCNews.com


Amid rising disenchantment with the war in Iraq, President Bush has lost significant ground on the issue on which he’s staked his presidency: fighting terrorism.

For the first time in ABC News/Washington Post polls, more than half of Americans, 52 percent, say the Iraq war was not worth fighting. Seven in 10 call U.S. casualties there “unacceptable,” a new high. And there’s been a steady slide in belief that the war has enhanced long-term U.S. security; 51 percent now say so, down 11 points this year.

Bush, moreover, has weakened in his once-strongest area. Approval of his handling of the U.S. campaign against terrorism has fallen to 50 percent, its lowest yet ? down eight points in the last month and 29 points below its immediate postwar peak. In a hazardous turn of fortune for Bush, Democrat John Kerry now runs evenly with him in trust to handle terrorism; Bush had led by 13 points on this issue a month ago, and by 21 points the month before.

While Kerry’s pressing hard on an issue Bush once owned, the president has not entirely relinquished his advantage on terrorism. On a personal level, the public by a 14-point margin picks him over Kerry to keep the nation safer and more secure. And the Massachusetts senator may be vulnerable on specifics; only four in 10 say he has a “clear plan” on terrorism, while Bush does better.

But Kerry is scoring against Bush elsewhere as well, running ahead in trust to handle five of nine issues tested in this poll, from taxes to education to health care; Bush doesn’t lead significantly in any of them. And personally, while Americans broadly see Bush as more consistent, they see Kerry as more honest and trustworthy, by a 13-point margin, and more in touch with their problems, by 20 points.

Evaluating Bush’s overall job performance, 47 percent of Americans now approve while 51 percent disapprove, inching over half for the first time in ABC/Post polls. In head-to-head matchups among registered voters, Kerry has a slight four-point lead over Bush when independent candidate Ralph Nader is included, and a larger eight-point lead with Nader out of the contest.

With life-and-death issues such as Iraq and terrorism as a backdrop, and the economy a continued concern, interest in the presidential contest is unusually high. More than three-quarters of Americans are following it closely, a third “very closely.” By contrast, at this time in 2000, fewer than half (49 percent) were closely following the contest between Bush and Al Gore, only 13 percent very closely.

Iraq Impact

While time ultimately will tell, at this point it’s hard to see Iraq as anything but a net negative politically for the Bush administration. In addition to increasingly negative reaction to the level of casualties, and essentially split decisions on whether the war was worth fighting or improved U.S. security, other assessments have worsened as well.

Seventy-six percent now say the war has damaged the United States’ image in the rest of the world; that’s 13 points more than last summer. Sixty-three percent say it’s caused long-term harm to U.S. relations with countries that opposed the war, up 12 points. And just four in 10 say it’s improved long-term stability in the Middle East, down eight points. (In a more positive assessment, 65 percent think the war has improved the lives of the Iraqi people.)

Iraq Handover

Given such views, the public seems eager to put Iraq back into Iraqis’ hands. An overwhelming 82 percent approve of the transfer of power to an interim government on June 30 ? but many see it as an insufficient exercise. More than half think the United States will continue to hold the real power in Iraq, even though three-quarters would prefer to see real power shift to the Iraqis.

Indeed, the public splits evenly on who should have final say on the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq ? the United States or the new Iraqi government. And majorities say the Iraqis should have final say on a variety of other fronts ? running Iraq’s oil industry, managing its economy, administering its non-U.S. foreign aid and determining what’s ultimately done with Saddam Hussein. (For the time being, though, Americans by 2-1 say the United States should keep physical custody of the former Iraqi president.)

There are just two matters, by contrast, in which majorities say the United States should retain final say in Iraq: the activities (as opposed to the presence) of U.S. forces, and the administration of American aid projects.

Others results show mixed perceptions of progress for the Bush administration: With a new interim government now in place and the formal handover imminent, half of Americans say the United States has made “significant progress” toward establishing a democratic government in Iraq. While hardly rousing, that’s up by 12 points from last month. The country divides similarly, 51 percent to 48 percent, on U.S. progress toward restoring civil order.

Iraq and Al Qaeda

Most Americans continue to suspect that Iraq, under Saddam, did provide support to the al Qaeda terrorist network ? a position under debate since the 9/11 commission last week reported that there was evidence of contacts, but not of an operational relationship, between the two.

It should be noted, though, that the majority’s suspicion of an Iraq-al Qaeda link is just that ? a suspicion, not an assertion or assumption of fact. In this poll, 62 percent think Iraq provided direct support to al Qaeda, nearly what it was (68 percent) in January 2003, before the war. But just 23 percent say there’s “solid evidence” of this support; 38 percent say instead that it’s their suspicion only.

As on other “50/50 nation” issues, the public divides about evenly on whether the Bush administration intentionally misled the American public about Iraq-al Qaeda links (48 percent say so) or told the public simply what it believed to be true (50 percent).

Terrorism

The murder Friday of Paul Johnson, an American working in Saudi Arabia, can’t have helped public views of the terrorism situation; indeed, Bush’s approval rating on terrorism was better in interviews Thursday night, before the slaying, than subsequently. At the same time, Bush’s trouble on this central issue has been brewing; he had 70 percent approval on terrorism in mid-December, 64 percent in February and 58 percent in May, en route to his 50 percent now.

It’s a problem for Bush because since Sept. 11, 2001, handling the war on terrorism has been his strongest rating by far ? the wellspring of his support. In this poll, by contrast, it’s no better than his middling ratings in several areas. And he does worse in a variety of others ? including health care (57 percent disapprove), the deficit (56 percent disapprove, albeit better than the 65 percent disapproval in March), international affairs and Iraq.

History

Bush’s position is an uncomfortable one in historical terms. In all but one case since 1948, incumbent presidents whose approval ratings were below 50 percent in June or July of an election year either lost (Bush’s father, Jimmy Carter, Gerald Ford) or didn’t run (Lyndon Johnson and Harry Truman in 1952). The exception was Truman in 1948.

Still, at 47 percent Bush’s approval rating is higher than others’ in the group ? closest to Ford, who lost narrowly. Bush’s father’s approval rating in June 1992, by contrast, was 12 points lower.

Bush vs. Kerry

As noted above, Kerry leads Bush in trust to handle a range of specific issues; moreover, Kerry’s standing on some of these have improved. He leads Bush by 13 points in trust to handle taxes; it was a six-point Bush lead in April. Kerry leads Bush by 12 points in trust to handle prescription drug benefits, up from three points in April. And Kerry has a 10-point lead on education; it was Bush +3 in April.

The most notable change, again, is in trust to handle terrorism ? Bush +21 in April, Bush +13 in May, Kerry +1 (i.e., a dead heat) now, a shift that occurred almost entirely among women, particularly independents. But the change on education, among others, is important as well; neutralizing the Democrats on this issue was crucial to Bush’s 2000 campaign.

Most Important Issue

Americans divide on which issue will be most important in their vote for president: Twenty-six percent say the economy, 19 percent Iraq, 18 percent terrorism, with the rest divided among other choices. There are sharp divisions within these issue groups. People who say Iraq is their most important issue pick Kerry over Bush in trust to handle it by nearly a 2-1 margin, 60 percent to 32 percent. Those who say it’s terrorism pick Bush to handle that issue by a similar margin, 67 percent to 31 percent. Among economy voters, Kerry is preferred, by 21 points.

Economy

The economy is one area in which the headwinds against Bush may be easing. In March, Bush’s disapproval for handling it was higher, 59 percent, and Kerry (riding his primary bounce) had a bigger lead in trust to handle it. While just 45 percent now say the economy’s in good shape, it was worse, 39 percent, in March, and worse still, 30 percent, last fall.

At the same time, using Ronald Reagan’s famous formulation, 45 percent of Americans say most people are worse off than when Bush took office, while just 17 percent say most are better off. This was a bit more negative last fall, but it’s still not at all good. To the extent that Bush may try to claim the Reagan mantle, Kerry might well respond with the better-off question that same president enshrined in the political lexicon.

Plans

Fifty-five percent say Bush does have a clear plan for dealing with terrorism, but fewer, ranging from 42 percent to 48 percent, say he has clear plans in other important areas: handling Iraq, the economy and health care.

Majorities see Kerry as having clear plans for two issues on this list ? health care and the economy. But just 42 percent say he has a clear plan on either terrorism or Iraq ? 13 points worse than Bush on the former, six points on the latter.

Attributes

In addition to issues, assessments of candidates’ personal attributes are an essential piece of any election puzzle. Here Americans are differentiating between Bush and Kerry in striking ways. Bush has a 21-point lead over Kerry as someone who “takes a position and sticks with it,” and, as noted, a 14-point lead as someone who “will make the country safer and more secure.”

Bush also leads by eight points as the stronger leader, and by 12 as the one best trusted in a crisis. The two are rated about evenly in values and standing up to special interest groups; while, as noted, Kerry leads by 13 points on honesty and trustworthiness, and by 20 points on empathy ? someone who “understands the problems of people like you.” As much as the issues, winning allegiance on these attributes is the ground on which the 2004 election will be fought.

Optimism

Part of winning that allegiance relies on the candidates’ personal outlook, and the extent to which it jibes with the public’s. Despite the country’s problems, optimism prevails in several areas.

Thinking about the year ahead, 62 percent are optimistic about “the way things are going in this country” (albeit down seven points from January); 66 percent are optimistic about the country’s ability to defend itself against terrorism (albeit down nine points); 64 percent are optimistic about the economy (level). Fewer, 52 percent, are optimistic about the situation in Iraq; it was 58 percent in January.

A challenge for Kerry is in finding a way to confront Bush on these issues, and portray the problems they pose, without sounding a note of dour pessimism that’s out of touch with the broader public’s point of view. Bush, for his part, has made a point lately of stressing his optimistic outlook, and contrasting it with Kerry’s.

Vote Preference

These issues and attributes will play out in vote preferences all summer and fall; what matters more at this point is the substance of the debate, not its eventual outcome ? which news polls this far from the event don’t even try to project.

Among other factors, vote preferences are influenced by, and in turn influence, political party allegiance. Among registered voters in this poll, 38 percent describe themselves as Democrats, 30 percent as Republicans and 28 percent as independents (it’s a 35 percent-29 percent-30 percent split among all Americans, not just those who say they’re registered to vote).

Those divisions are almost precisely the same as they were in the last ABC/Post poll, in late May (among registered voters, 37 percent-29 percent-28 percent). In that poll, Bush and Kerry were even in the three-way race (46 percent-46 percent-4 percent, compared with 44 percent-48 percent-6 percent here); and it was 47 percent-49 percent Bush-Kerry in the two-way race, compared with 45 percent-53 percent here.

These slight shifts in preference have occurred, not in the overall partisan makeup of the sample, but among groups. Women, in particular, have moved toward Kerry, as have, perhaps most crucially, independents ? the true swing voters in election politics.

Methodology

This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone June 17-20 among a random national sample of 1,201 adults. The results have a three-point error margin. Sampling, data collection and tabulation were done by TNS of Horsham, Pa.

06-22-04 06:28 EDT

Copyright 2004 ABC News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

The starkest contrast between Bush and his predecessor is the fact that Bush will not bend to the slightest change in public opinion.

He is doing what he is convinced is right for the war on terror - not what 52% of americans think he should be doing today.

If you wait a couple of weeks I’m sure those numbers will change.

The ultimate opinion poll will not be taken until the first Tuesday in November

Yeah, but this one counts more in terms of the election – not that any poll counts before November…

BTW, is that ABC poll of likely voters, i.e. people who will actually vote based on a history of voting? If not, it ain’t worth jack diddly squat.


JUNE 21, 2004

President Bush is seeing his support solidify in some key battleground states, according to the latest Zogby Interactive poll <javascript: window.open(‘http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-battleground04-frameset.html’,‘battleground04’,'toolbar=no,scrollbars=no,location=no,width=778,height=532,left=30,top=30’); void(‘’);>. But how does that translate into the Electoral College tally?
Here’s one way of looking at it, keeping in mind that many of the results are within the margin of error.
First, let’s assume that the District of Columbia and the 34 states that aren’t in the Battleground analysis go for the same political party they did in 2000. Given that, Mr. Bush starts with 189 electoral votes and Mr. Kerry with 172. (A candidate needs 270 to win.)
Now, add in the 16 states from the latest Battleground poll, regardless of margin of error. In that scenario, the president’s Electoral College total climbs to 285 and Mr. Kerry’s to 253.
But keep in mind that results from 12 of the 16 states, representing 114 electoral votes, are within the polls’ margin of error. Of those electoral votes, 65 are in the Bush column while 49 are in the Kerry column.
Between the June 7 poll and the most recent one, six states swung from one candidate to the other. Four of those states – worth a combined 54 electoral votes – went to Mr. Bush.
Florida, where Mr. Kerry held a narrow lead in the first two polls, turned over to the president. Nevada, which Mr. Bush won in 2000 but trailed in the first two Battleground polls, also moved into Mr. Bush’s camp, as did Michigan and West Virginia. Mr. Bush tightened his grip on Ohio, where his lead moved outside the poll’s margin of error.
But New Mexico took a big swing in Mr. Kerry’s favor and Arkansas, which Mr. Bush led solidly in the first two polls, also turned blue.
In all, Mr. Bush’s projected national lead is just as fragile as Mr. Kerry’s was in recent weeks. The president is ahead by less than a percentage point in two big states: Michigan and Missouri. If both of those were to tip to Mr. Kerry, the senator would carry the Electoral College, 281-257.
Ralph Nader had his best showing to date, picking up 4.4% of the vote in Nevada. In the prior two surveys, the independent candidate hadn’t polled better than 3.4% in any state. Although 4.4% appears scant, it made the difference. Mr. Kerry came out ahead in the first two Battleground polls of likely Nevada voters, but this time – in a three-way matchup – Mr. Bush leads Mr. Kerry by 2.5 percentage points. In a two-way race that excluded Mr. Nader from the ballot, Mr. Kerry leads by 0.5%.
Need more evidence of just how close the race is? In six states, one candidate leads the other by less than four percentage points. Mr. Bush is ahead in three states and Mr. Kerry in three. If everything else stayed the same but these six states turned over – Mr. Bush won the states where Mr. Kerry now leads and Mr. Kerry won the states where Mr. Bush leads – the Electoral College would be tied, 269-269.
Then the question would become: What will the House of Representatives do?

Just read the bottom of your poll – random sample of adults is not likely voters, hence, worth jack diddly squat.

BTW, here’s another interpretation of your jack diddly squat:

http://www.belgraviadispatch.com/archives/001440.html

Lies, Damn Lies, and Statistics
Ouch.

But this is better news for Dubya.

Here’s the lead WaPo story.

You know, I’m a bit of a skeptic when it comes to polls.

For instance, how can this be right?

The president is viewed as a stronger leader than Kerry and as the candidate who can be most trusted in a crisis. He is also seen as best able to “make the country safer and more secure” and the one who “takes a position and sticks with it.”
But by 52 percent to 39 percent, Kerry is seen as more honest and trustworthy – a troubling finding for Bush, whose truthfulness before the war in Iraq has been called into question.
The two bolded parts appear a bit contradictory, don’t they?

Here’s the specific polling data:

  1. Kerry more honest; BUT

  2. Bush can be trusted more in a crisis…

Hmmmm…work that one out for me? My guess:

Bush is seen a strong, principled leader–but all the (mostly hyped) stories about how Bush ginned up al-Q/Saddam links have hurt him (ed. note: If so many Americans think they were misled on this score; someone please explain this poll result to me?)

Again, lies, damn lies, and statistics.

So you throw in a good dollop of media stories about all the space between avuncular Tom Kean/Lee Hamilton and messianic ‘damn the evidence’ Dubya and Cheney–you get a disconnect where most Americans (over 60%) believe or suspect Saddam had cooperated with al-Q historically–but a full 48% nevertheless believe they were misled on said alleged links.

How about the critical economy?

Well, are you better off than you were 4 years ago?

Well yeah, or at least the same …

Not bad given one of the most absurd bubbles in financial history had just popped as Dubya came into office.

And, importantly, it appears most people think the economy is going to be on an uptick going forward.

So here’s the deal folks.

Pretty much, people are evenly split on whether Bush or Kerry would handle the war on terror better (48% Kerry to 47% Bush).

But by a margin of 54% to 40% people think Bush will make the country safer and more secure (second link at top of post).

And Bush beats Kerry on having a “clear plan” on terrorism 55% to 42%.

More Americans trust Bush in a crisis (but perhaps trust Kerry more during quotidian times?) (again, per above links)

More Americans think Bush has a clear plan for Iraq than they believe Kerry does (48% to 42%).

Oh, and this strikes me as important.

So tell me, please, why does the WaPo headline blare: “Bush Loses Advantage in War on Terrorism”?

Just asking.

P.S. Not a sole query on Abu Ghraib? All Lottian insouciance, I reckon, even amongst the pollsters and the great public…

UPDATE: Jon Henke and Robert Tagorda have more on this. Tagorda’s post has an interesting take on why the WaPo’s unnuanced lede (the 21% drop in Bush’s war on terror approval rating) has occurred.

Polls aren’t perfect, but they highlight important issues. Of course, sampling the general public won’t yield well thought out consistent results, that is no surprise.

Ignore what the polls say, as they reflect what the public will be saying to each other when they discuss elections, at your own peril.

While Bush may never change his stance or admit his errors, you can bet his political machine will analyze findings such as these and craft messages to attempt to sway the voters. Kerry’s team of course will be pushing the other way.

Finally, at least the polls are an external viewpoint. How much can we continue to try to convince each other how things will go due to our own opinions on this stuff?

[quote]vroom wrote:
Ignore what the polls say, as they reflect what the public will be saying to each other when they discuss elections, at your own peril.
[/quote]

vroom:

Polls of the general public are useless because they are almost irrelevant as far as predicting election results. Polls, in terms of accuracy, go like this: all adults (completely worthless); registered voters (mostly useless, but better); and likely voters (somewhat useful).

The reason they don’t always just use likely voters is that the more useful the information, the more expensive it is to get – i.e., polls of likely voters are a lot more expensive.

As far as external information, they aren’t really useful in terms of the persuasive arguments (hopefully persuasive anyway) that occur here – they are just reflections of the thoughts of the moment, and are also largely reflective of how the questions are phrased.

Anyone else notice how Wasted Years doesn’t actually respond or reply to anything he starts - he merely regurgitates some article he found?

Wasted Years - any thoughts of your own?