First of all, to Morg who sarcastically said “Lets spend money on
Government programs!” DUH???
Republicans have grown the size of the government to unprecedented levels. republicans are the ones spending billions so that Iraq can have cell phones, a new zip code system, new prisons and hospitals, etc. Republicans have initiated the largest entitlement programs in this country’s history. These programs have been described by other Republicans as “endless pork”. As John McCain said, “Congress is spending money like a drunken sailor”. It is Republicans who are wasting unprecendented amounts of taxpayer money.
Second, the Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld admitted that we may be creating terrorists faster than we are killing them. I personally believe this is the case, and suspect Rumsfeld does too. Otherwise, I doubt Rumsfeld would bring it up, since it casts doubts on the mission.
Finally, read the thread “54 of what?” about Colonel Hackworth.
"In his email to Colonel Hackworth, who he has known for eight years, the soldier with the 4th Infantry Division wrote of Sunday’s incident: “Hack, most of the casualties were civilians, not insurgents or criminals as being reported.”
He added “We are probably turning many Iraqi against us and I am afraid instead of climbing out of the hole, we are digging ourselves in deeper.”
To Biltrightweave, I don’t think some of your statistics are accurate. For example, I read that only one-third or Iraqi schools are open, and that most of them don’t have enough books or desks, the construction on new buildings is already falling apart, etc.
But lets assume your stats are correct… what exactly is your point? That throwing hundreds of billions of dollars of US taxpayers’ money into Iraq is making the trains run on time? Big deal!
The fact is that we have not achieved any of the objectives in Iraq, except one: Saddam is no longer in power.
Iaq is not a democracy. There is a very good chance Iraq will not ever be a democracy.
We are not reducing the risks of terrorism against the US. We have turned the world’s public opinion against the US, and are likely creating new generations of terrorists.
We did not solve the political crisis in the Mid-East (some claimed the war would create peace between Israel and Palestine).
We have caused countries to increase their attempts to acquire nuclear weapons, because nukes can deter a Bush pre-emptive strike.
We set a precedent for other nations to make illegal pre-emptive strikes. How can we tell Pakistan they can’t attack India (or vice versa) as a premptive measure, when we’ve done it ourselves?
Yes it is nice to get rid of Saddam but that’s not why we attacked Iraq. We attacked because Iraq was supposedly an imminent threat. In truth, Iraq wasn’t even a threat to it’s own neighbors.
If there was a moral basis for attcking Iraq, we would not be cozying up to other dictatorships like we do in the former Soviet Union (Uzbekistan) we would have invaded Rwanda years ago, we would have invaded China, and so on. There is no such thing as “selective morality”. If there was a moral basis behind the war, why did Bush’s own church condemn the illegal pre-emptive strikes? Why did the pope condemn it?
There is a constantly-changing rationale for starting the war, which is a sure sign that the rationale is probably bullshit. Whatever the rationale is, a government is obligated to be completely honest with it’s citizens, and this administration has not been honest.