Policing the World?

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
And your damn right we will invade there land to make it better for them.

Spoken like a true imperialist.[/quote]

I speak like someone who is willing to help others out. The fact is most are thankfull that we took him out of power. Most of them realize whats going on is temporary and know that it will become much better. And hell after things get settled down, having America as an ally would be very benifical to them.

John S while I agree about Europe needing America, your vernacular is exactly what I am on about. Gung ho and just unpalatable, which pretty much sums up what alot of people think about Americans. It is absolute ignorance to assume you don’t need Europe. A UN mandate is the only legitimate one, and you aint gonna get shit without us poor old Euro’s. And by the way it wasn’t Europe that helped out, it was the UK - no fucker else had the bollocks like I said in my previous post. Most of Europe hates the British because we are better than them, get pissed lots and fight with their men and shag their women when we go to their countries.

[quote]John S. wrote:
We did not need Europe to fuck over Iraq. Was it a help sure, but we steam rolled though them just fine. Hell we didn’t even have to use a full force. It is true that europe is helping us hold down some places, but it is not like we couldn’t call apon more troops to take care of it.

The fact of the matter is Europe needs America far more then America needs Europe, and that is why Europe will help us out because they know that the small price they pay now will make is so when the next big country decides that you guys need to be made into there bitch America will step in and fuck them up.[/quote]

Oh please, what country could possibly attack us without getting bitch slapped?

Not even the US, so unless aliens attack we are fine, thank you.

Economically we are stronger than you and keep expanding and diplomatically you are a burden.

[quote]symze wrote:
John S while I agree about Europe needing America, your vernacular is exactly what I am on about. Gung ho and just unpalatable, which pretty much sums up what alot of people think about Americans. It is absolute ignorance to assume you don’t need Europe. A UN mandate is the only legitimate one, and you aint gonna get shit without us poor old Euro’s. And by the way it wasn’t Europe that helped out, it was the UK - no fucker else had the bollocks like I said in my previous post. Most of Europe hates the British because we are better than them, get pissed lots and fight with their men and shag their women when we go to their countries.[/quote]

Is fixing a dictatorship gun ho? if so then yes put me down as one gun ho mother fucker. Now you are taking me saying we didn’t need Europe in this fight to we don’t need Europe. Now it would be foolish to state that.

Oh and if the UN actually wants to prove there worth Darfur could use there help, Untill the UN gets off there ass and does something I personally couldn’t care less about them.

[quote]symze wrote:
John S while I agree about Europe needing America, your vernacular is exactly what I am on about. Gung ho and just unpalatable, which pretty much sums up what alot of people think about Americans. It is absolute ignorance to assume you don’t need Europe. A UN mandate is the only legitimate one, and you aint gonna get shit without us poor old Euro’s. And by the way it wasn’t Europe that helped out, it was the UK - no fucker else had the bollocks like I said in my previous post. Most of Europe hates the British because we are better than them, get pissed lots and fight with their men and shag their women when we go to their countries.[/quote]

I am afraid that we are more intimidated by your cuisine than the superior British lovemaking.

[quote]orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
We did not need Europe to fuck over Iraq. Was it a help sure, but we steam rolled though them just fine. Hell we didn’t even have to use a full force. It is true that europe is helping us hold down some places, but it is not like we couldn’t call apon more troops to take care of it.

The fact of the matter is Europe needs America far more then America needs Europe, and that is why Europe will help us out because they know that the small price they pay now will make is so when the next big country decides that you guys need to be made into there bitch America will step in and fuck them up.

Oh please, what country could possibly attack us without getting bitch slapped?

Not even the US, so unless aliens attack we are fine, thank you.

Economically we are stronger than you and keep expanding and diplomatically you are a burden.

[/quote]

Russia and China would bitch slap you. It is one of the main reasons why your country’s are calling out to us to build a missile defence system.

[quote]orion wrote:
symze wrote:
John S while I agree about Europe needing America, your vernacular is exactly what I am on about. Gung ho and just unpalatable, which pretty much sums up what alot of people think about Americans. It is absolute ignorance to assume you don’t need Europe. A UN mandate is the only legitimate one, and you aint gonna get shit without us poor old Euro’s. And by the way it wasn’t Europe that helped out, it was the UK - no fucker else had the bollocks like I said in my previous post. Most of Europe hates the British because we are better than them, get pissed lots and fight with their men and shag their women when we go to their countries.

I am afraid that we are more intimidated by your cuisine than the superior British lovemaking.[/quote]

Sorry where are you from again, Austria, isn’t that just a province of Germany just more facist. And cuisine, please, what on earth have you got to shout about apart from being efficient?

[quote]John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
We did not need Europe to fuck over Iraq. Was it a help sure, but we steam rolled though them just fine. Hell we didn’t even have to use a full force. It is true that europe is helping us hold down some places, but it is not like we couldn’t call apon more troops to take care of it.

The fact of the matter is Europe needs America far more then America needs Europe, and that is why Europe will help us out because they know that the small price they pay now will make is so when the next big country decides that you guys need to be made into there bitch America will step in and fuck them up.

Oh please, what country could possibly attack us without getting bitch slapped?

Not even the US, so unless aliens attack we are fine, thank you.

Economically we are stronger than you and keep expanding and diplomatically you are a burden.

Russia and China would bitch slap you. It is one of the main reasons why your country’s are calling out to us to build a missile defence system.[/quote]

Some countries have.

They were wrong.

Neither Russia nor China could hope to achieve anything militarily against Europe or even one third of it.

Plus, it does not pay to attack your customers and investors.

But, if there is one thing that would stop the internal arguing and have us build the biggest fighting force on this planet it is a serious threat from the outside.

[quote]symze wrote:
orion wrote:
symze wrote:
John S while I agree about Europe needing America, your vernacular is exactly what I am on about. Gung ho and just unpalatable, which pretty much sums up what alot of people think about Americans. It is absolute ignorance to assume you don’t need Europe. A UN mandate is the only legitimate one, and you aint gonna get shit without us poor old Euro’s. And by the way it wasn’t Europe that helped out, it was the UK - no fucker else had the bollocks like I said in my previous post. Most of Europe hates the British because we are better than them, get pissed lots and fight with their men and shag their women when we go to their countries.

I am afraid that we are more intimidated by your cuisine than the superior British lovemaking.

Sorry where are you from again, Austria, isn’t that just a province of Germany just more facist. And cuisine, please, what on earth have you got to shout about apart from being efficient?[/quote]

Edible food? Affordable dental care?

And of course Tyrolean ski instructors that see more British pussy in one year than all British gynecologists combined.

[quote]orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
We did not need Europe to fuck over Iraq. Was it a help sure, but we steam rolled though them just fine. Hell we didn’t even have to use a full force. It is true that europe is helping us hold down some places, but it is not like we couldn’t call apon more troops to take care of it.

The fact of the matter is Europe needs America far more then America needs Europe, and that is why Europe will help us out because they know that the small price they pay now will make is so when the next big country decides that you guys need to be made into there bitch America will step in and fuck them up.

Oh please, what country could possibly attack us without getting bitch slapped?

Not even the US, so unless aliens attack we are fine, thank you.

Economically we are stronger than you and keep expanding and diplomatically you are a burden.

Russia and China would bitch slap you. It is one of the main reasons why your country’s are calling out to us to build a missile defence system.

Some countries have.

They were wrong.

Neither Russia nor China could hope to achieve anything militarily against Europe or even one third of it.

Plus, it does not pay to attack your customers and investors.

But, if there is one thing that would stop the internal arguing and have us build the biggest fighting force on this planet it is a serious threat from the outside.

[/quote]

Russia right now is flexing, And the country’s see it and are demanding help already. Before shit even starts getting messy they are already running to us. Really shows how much you guys could bitch slap everyone.

[quote]John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
We did not need Europe to fuck over Iraq. Was it a help sure, but we steam rolled though them just fine. Hell we didn’t even have to use a full force. It is true that europe is helping us hold down some places, but it is not like we couldn’t call apon more troops to take care of it.

The fact of the matter is Europe needs America far more then America needs Europe, and that is why Europe will help us out because they know that the small price they pay now will make is so when the next big country decides that you guys need to be made into there bitch America will step in and fuck them up.

Oh please, what country could possibly attack us without getting bitch slapped?

Not even the US, so unless aliens attack we are fine, thank you.

Economically we are stronger than you and keep expanding and diplomatically you are a burden.

Russia and China would bitch slap you. It is one of the main reasons why your country’s are calling out to us to build a missile defence system.

Some countries have.

They were wrong.

Neither Russia nor China could hope to achieve anything militarily against Europe or even one third of it.

Plus, it does not pay to attack your customers and investors.

But, if there is one thing that would stop the internal arguing and have us build the biggest fighting force on this planet it is a serious threat from the outside.

Russia right now is flexing, And the country’s see it and are demanding help already. Before shit even starts getting messy they are already running to us. Really shows how much you guys could bitch slap everyone.[/quote]

As I said, they are wrong.

We need a combined European force and a professional one at that.

If push came to shove the US would not defend those countries whereas we had too.

To think the US will come to the rescue when they very likely won´t, makes a country less save.

[quote]orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
We did not need Europe to fuck over Iraq. Was it a help sure, but we steam rolled though them just fine. Hell we didn’t even have to use a full force. It is true that europe is helping us hold down some places, but it is not like we couldn’t call apon more troops to take care of it.

The fact of the matter is Europe needs America far more then America needs Europe, and that is why Europe will help us out because they know that the small price they pay now will make is so when the next big country decides that you guys need to be made into there bitch America will step in and fuck them up.

Oh please, what country could possibly attack us without getting bitch slapped?

Not even the US, so unless aliens attack we are fine, thank you.

Economically we are stronger than you and keep expanding and diplomatically you are a burden.

Russia and China would bitch slap you. It is one of the main reasons why your country’s are calling out to us to build a missile defence system.

Some countries have.

They were wrong.

Neither Russia nor China could hope to achieve anything militarily against Europe or even one third of it.

Plus, it does not pay to attack your customers and investors.

But, if there is one thing that would stop the internal arguing and have us build the biggest fighting force on this planet it is a serious threat from the outside.

Russia right now is flexing, And the country’s see it and are demanding help already. Before shit even starts getting messy they are already running to us. Really shows how much you guys could bitch slap everyone.

As I said, they are wrong.

We need a combined European force and a professional one at that.

If push came to shove the US would not defend those countries whereas we had too.

To think the US will come to the rescue when they very likely won´t, makes a country less save.

[/quote]

America has always come to your aid. Infact its the main reason why Europe is not speaking german and Saluting the fuhrer.

[quote]orion wrote:
symze wrote:
orion wrote:
symze wrote:
John S while I agree about Europe needing America, your vernacular is exactly what I am on about. Gung ho and just unpalatable, which pretty much sums up what alot of people think about Americans. It is absolute ignorance to assume you don’t need Europe. A UN mandate is the only legitimate one, and you aint gonna get shit without us poor old Euro’s. And by the way it wasn’t Europe that helped out, it was the UK - no fucker else had the bollocks like I said in my previous post. Most of Europe hates the British because we are better than them, get pissed lots and fight with their men and shag their women when we go to their countries.

I am afraid that we are more intimidated by your cuisine than the superior British lovemaking.

Sorry where are you from again, Austria, isn’t that just a province of Germany just more facist. And cuisine, please, what on earth have you got to shout about apart from being efficient?

Edible food? Affordable dental care?

And of course Tyrolean ski instructors that see more British pussy in one year than all British gynecologists combined.

[/quote]

So in summary, nice food (sausage), affordable dental care for the masses (population of a handful), skiing instructors getting pussy (english girls are slags so not much to that claim).

[quote]John S. wrote:
I speak like someone who is willing to help others out. The fact is most are thankfull that we took him out of power. Most of them realize whats going on is temporary and know that it will become much better. And hell after things get settled down, having America as an ally would be very benifical to them.[/quote]

You may not realize it, but your words are textbook imperialism. Be it the Romans, Brits, French or Russians, the line has always been we’re invading them for their own good. It is not surprising that Americans fall for that. After all, they have never been colonized and - compared to, say Europeans - couldn’t care less about geography or world history. That leaves a population that genuinely believes every war the US starts is necessary to fight “evil forces”. You delude yourself into thinking in absolute terms and believing you are “the good guys”, but a quick look at the lame justifications the war was sold under should wake you up. Luckily, common sense seem to be prevailing and the general populace had it with blood being gratuitously spilled in their name.

Your claim that “most are thankfull”[sic] is nothing short of preposterous. Hussein was a tyrant, but people who kept their noses out of politics (that is, 9 out of 10 people) had jobs, houses, kids and lives. You destroyed their houses, killed their kids and ruined their lives. It is nearly impossible for a person who’s lost a loved one, been displaced, made homeless or got injured by weapons “Made in USA” to be thankful. Given enough time, they might forgive you but they will never forget what you have done to their country. The war touched everybody, and the lucky ones whose families came out intact, have at least one person in their entourage who’s pushing daisies thanks to your interventionism.

You went where no person on this board has gone before. You are defending the war based not on (non-existing) WMDs, (fictitious) Saddam Al-Qaeda connection, cleaning up the mess nor HH’s-we-do-as-we-please attitude. You’re arguing that you have the right, ney the responsibility, to invade countries for their own good. You’re a jerkwad of the highest caliber, but even if I do hope the people responsible for these crimes get some retribution, I still wouldn’t wish your country gets invaded “for its own good”. I’m not that cynical just yet.

[quote]lixy wrote:
John S. wrote:
I speak like someone who is willing to help others out. The fact is most are thankfull that we took him out of power. Most of them realize whats going on is temporary and know that it will become much better. And hell after things get settled down, having America as an ally would be very benifical to them.

You may not realize it, but your words are textbook imperialism. Be it the Romans, Brits, French or Russians, the line has always been we’re invading them for their own good. It is not surprising that Americans fall for that. After all, they have never been colonized and - compared to, say Europeans - couldn’t care less about geography or world history. That leaves a population that genuinely believes every war the US starts is necessary to fight “evil forces”. You delude yourself into thinking in absolute terms and believing you are “the good guys”, but a quick look at the lame justifications the war was sold under should wake you up. Luckily, common sense seem to be prevailing and the general populace had it with blood being gratuitously spilled in their name.

Your claim that “most are thankfull”[sic] is nothing short of preposterous. Hussein was a tyrant, but people who kept their noses out of politics (that is, 9 out of 10 people) had jobs, houses, kids and lives. You destroyed their houses, killed their kids and ruined their lives. It is nearly impossible for a person who’s lost a loved one, been displaced, made homeless or got injured by weapons “Made in USA” to be thankful. Given enough time, they might forgive you but they will never forget what you have done to their country. The war touched everybody, and the lucky ones whose families came out intact, have at least one person in their entourage who’s pushing daisies thanks to your interventionism.

You went where no person on this board has gone before. You are defending the war based not on (non-existing) WMDs, (fictitious) Saddam Al-Qaeda connection, cleaning up the mess nor HH’s-we-do-as-we-please attitude. You’re arguing that you have the right, ney the responsibility, to invade countries for their own good. You’re a jerkwad of the highest caliber, but even if I do hope the people responsible for these crimes get some retribution, I still wouldn’t wish your country gets invaded “for its own good”. I’m not that cynical just yet.[/quote]

Yeah your right, People loved him, thats why after we fucked them up the first time they where begging us to save them. Who do you think they hate more, us targeting a majority of terrorists and causing a few innocent deaths, or the terrorist targeting 2-3 soldiers and killing 100 innocent people? I mean hell, we could leave right now with are victory and leave them to pick up the mess, but we don’t do that we are helping them build themselves up.

[quote]lixy wrote:
DrSkeptix wrote:
2. Bastards need killin.’ I agree. But who decides who are the bastards?

Allow me to illuminate you; anyone who attacks unprovoked (i.e: not in unambiguous self-defense) falls in that category.[/quote]

Is this Muslim Logic? The dude violated 18 UN resolutions. He couldn’t even obey resolutions put together mostly by his fellow criminals.

You’re all for Peace and Love but when you see what’s required to achieve peace, you shrink in horror from it. You remind me of people who don’t like T-Men until those people are in danger or suffering, then call on them to help you. You want rules but don’t want the men who can enforce the rules.

Is so much illogicity possible for one guy, Lixy?

[quote]John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
orion wrote:
John S. wrote:
We did not need Europe to fuck over Iraq. Was it a help sure, but we steam rolled though them just fine. Hell we didn’t even have to use a full force. It is true that europe is helping us hold down some places, but it is not like we couldn’t call apon more troops to take care of it.

The fact of the matter is Europe needs America far more then America needs Europe, and that is why Europe will help us out because they know that the small price they pay now will make is so when the next big country decides that you guys need to be made into there bitch America will step in and fuck them up.

Oh please, what country could possibly attack us without getting bitch slapped?

Not even the US, so unless aliens attack we are fine, thank you.

Economically we are stronger than you and keep expanding and diplomatically you are a burden.

Russia and China would bitch slap you. It is one of the main reasons why your country’s are calling out to us to build a missile defence system.

Some countries have.

They were wrong.

Neither Russia nor China could hope to achieve anything militarily against Europe or even one third of it.

Plus, it does not pay to attack your customers and investors.

But, if there is one thing that would stop the internal arguing and have us build the biggest fighting force on this planet it is a serious threat from the outside.

Russia right now is flexing, And the country’s see it and are demanding help already. Before shit even starts getting messy they are already running to us. Really shows how much you guys could bitch slap everyone.

As I said, they are wrong.

We need a combined European force and a professional one at that.

If push came to shove the US would not defend those countries whereas we had too.

To think the US will come to the rescue when they very likely won´t, makes a country less save.

America has always come to your aid. Infact its the main reason why Europe is not speaking german and Saluting the fuhrer.[/quote]

If you check your facts that hardly meant coming to the aid of my country.

Defeating and occupying it is more like it.

Thank your Grandpa for that though.

[quote]symze wrote:
orion wrote:
symze wrote:
orion wrote:
symze wrote:
John S while I agree about Europe needing America, your vernacular is exactly what I am on about. Gung ho and just unpalatable, which pretty much sums up what alot of people think about Americans. It is absolute ignorance to assume you don’t need Europe. A UN mandate is the only legitimate one, and you aint gonna get shit without us poor old Euro’s. And by the way it wasn’t Europe that helped out, it was the UK - no fucker else had the bollocks like I said in my previous post. Most of Europe hates the British because we are better than them, get pissed lots and fight with their men and shag their women when we go to their countries.

I am afraid that we are more intimidated by your cuisine than the superior British lovemaking.

Sorry where are you from again, Austria, isn’t that just a province of Germany just more facist. And cuisine, please, what on earth have you got to shout about apart from being efficient?

Edible food? Affordable dental care?

And of course Tyrolean ski instructors that see more British pussy in one year than all British gynecologists combined.

So in summary, nice food (sausage), affordable dental care for the masses (population of a handful), skiing instructors getting pussy (english girls are slags so not much to that claim). [/quote]

Awesome landscape and beautiful historical buildings?

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
lixy wrote:
DrSkeptix wrote:
2. Bastards need killin.’ I agree. But who decides who are the bastards?

Allow me to illuminate you; anyone who attacks unprovoked (i.e: not in unambiguous self-defense) falls in that category.

Is this Muslim Logic? The dude violated 18 UN resolutions. He couldn’t even obey resolutions put together mostly by his fellow criminals.

You’re all for Peace and Love but when you see what’s required to achieve peace, you shrink in horror from it. You remind me of people who don’t like T-Men until those people are in danger or suffering, then call on them to help you. You want rules but don’t want the men who can enforce the rules.

Is so much illogicity possible for one guy, Lixy?

[/quote]

Are you just advocating to wage war to have peace and accusing someone of being illogical in one paragraph?