Americans EXPLODE With Rage At Health Insurers After CEO Murder!
All I can say is: glad your dead!
Americans EXPLODE With Rage At Health Insurers After CEO Murder!
All I can say is: glad your dead!
I don’t know if I’m glad but I also don’t feel bad.
@castoli1971 *you’re
Also shut up, we’ve got this handled on the squirrel thread.
We already covered this in the squirrel thread.
Now take your moment in the sun and get back to blowing goats.
As soon as i saw the title of the thread, i knew who posted it.
I was 200 posts behind in the squirrel thread when I checked and I’m not going back through all of them, but I don’t understand why people are so angry at insurance companies.
They’re for profit, private businesses who exist to subsidize healthcare costs, and they only exist because healthcare costs are extremely expensive and most people need subsidies.
If you want to murder someone to make a point about healthcare costs, make it a healthcare professional. Maybe a surgeon, hospital system exec, pharma exec et cetera.
Or Obama, for forcing you to buy in.
Unfortunately I have to sign in to prove I’m not a bot to see the Seinfeld clip, and I’m not going to.
But I’m going to go with no I’m not.
No one was arguing about costs; they were talking about claims being denied by AI. There’s a reason why this dead douche was under investigation. Again, you’re way off.
We’ve moved on to zecarlo solving working conditions in the 3rd world.
I don’t really care what wild speculation the squirrel conversation spiraled in to.
Insurance is a private, for profit industry that exists to subsidize costs.
If you want to make a point about healthcare costs, address them directly.
But regarding claims, the literal subsidization of costs, every insurance contract in existence outlines coverage and limitations.
It’s not their fault if you’re a dumbass and don’t read contracts you sign.
I’m kinda disappointed that the marmots didn’t catch on, but oh well. Sometimes thats just the way it goes.
Due to the age of the bullets, it counts as a preexisting condition.
Are you retarded? I don’t want to make that point. You want to argue about something no one else wants to. You’re an answer looking for a question.
Well, he’s dead and no one is shedding a tear so there’s that. I guess you would call that winning.
You solved it with the Potato Recess Matrix.
I made the point, you’re free to avoid responding and can stick to the squirrel thread if you’ve already set up one of your retarded, off base, snippet derived mouse traps that never makes sense from a high level, in context view.
Still incredibly misguided.
A list of people to kill first:
Or understand nobody owes you shit and if you can’t or don’t want to pay for somebody’s services it’s a personal problem.
You should definitely read contracts though, if you are going to pay for services. Insurance services specifically.
Ah yes.
By forcing them to read Shakespeare until their eyes bleed I assume.
Again, you are way off. Claims get denied by AI, algorithms, not people with knowledge (because you have to pay them). They aren’t denied because they aren’t covered but to delay payment. They also know that a certain percentage of people won’t question the denial even though they would be right to. It’s a scam and it’s why these dirt bags are being investigated. Go look up the story about anesthesia.
Again, you’re way off. These are people who have been paying for insurance. Thanks for participating.
Largely speculation. The rest is legally binding and if the speculation you’re making is true they will not only have to pay the claim they’re legally obligated to pay via contractual agreement in one of the most heavily regulated industries on the planet, they will be sued immensely.
Revisit contractual agreement. Specifically exclusions and limitations. You’re showcasing the problem, ironically.
For your next trick, throw a hardback collection of Chaucer stories at me.