FightinIrish26 you’re full of BS. no matter how you play it, pac called gayweather’s bluff. end of the story. you pick all of pac’s opponent to win against him and time and again you lose. your opinion is worthless ya gaytard.
Looks like Pacquiao is going to fight Yuri Foreman, what a joke.
[quote]goldengloves wrote:
Looks like Pacquiao is going to fight Yuri Foreman, what a joke.[/quote]
And it looks like Mayweather is going to fight Paulie Malignaggi.
Oh well, guess I’m going to have to look forward to something else in March.
[quote]fnf wrote:
[quote]goldengloves wrote:
Looks like Pacquiao is going to fight Yuri Foreman, what a joke.[/quote]
And it looks like Mayweather is going to fight Paulie Malignaggi.
Oh well, guess I’m going to have to look forward to something else in March.
[/quote]
Another disappointing match.
If these fights happen I’ll probably go watch Mayweather/Malignaggi, it wouldn’t be worth the drive to see Pacquiao crush a can though. I wish one of them would fight the winner of Mosley/Berto.
[quote]goryo13 wrote:
FightinIrish26 you’re full of BS. no matter how you play it, pac called gayweather’s bluff. end of the story. you pick all of pac’s opponent to win against him and time and again you lose. your opinion is worthless ya gaytard.[/quote]
Go back to junior high nancy.
I can’t believe May/Pac and their respective teams would let this stupid steroid bullshit mess up this fight. Oh well, at least I can keep my New Years resolution to pay off my credit card instead of blowing all my money on a trip to Vegas in March. Although there is always the Machida/Shogun rematch in Montreal for me to blow my money on instead.
wait, what’s this???
Mayweather’s Drug History Caught Up With Him
http://www.8countnews.com/news/125/ARTICLE/2212/2010-01-09.html
[quote]SKman wrote:
I can’t believe May/Pac and their respective teams would let this stupid steroid bullshit mess up this fight. Oh well, at least I can keep my New Years resolution to pay off my credit card instead of blowing all my money on a trip to Vegas in March. Although there is always the Machida/Shogun rematch in Montreal for me to blow my money on instead.[/quote]
millions of money down the drain, eh?!? well, at least, you saved yours.
[quote]goryo13 wrote:
wait, what’s this???
Mayweather’s Drug History Caught Up With Him
http://www.8countnews.com/news/125/ARTICLE/2212/2010-01-09.html[/quote]
Lol, I figured this trash would make its way on here.
Oscar was using it before his fight with Bernard Hopkins because his hand was cut during training. You can use it during training with permission from the Nevada boxing commission, you just can’t use it during the fight. If Mayweather has used it during a fight he’d test positive for it, which he hasn’t. Also, Floyd Mayweather has wanted to fight in Vegas for as long as I’ve been watching him[his entire pro career]. Even when Arum was promoting him he used to turn down fights because he only wanted to fight in Vegas.
good try though goryo…LOL!
Did any one hear what Teddy Atlas reported last night on Friday Night Fights?
Well according to Teddy’s “source”, someone in Pacs camp sent an email to Floyds camp asking what would be the penalty if Pac did test positive for PEDs?"…“and if he did test positive could they keep it confidential? as it would only hurt the sport of boxing”…Atlas went on to say while the email isnt incriminating in anyway, it does seem fishy.
To me its pretty risky for ESPN to let Atlas speak on that bit of info, if the source wasnt some what reliable…right?
What’s all this talk about Foreman? Everything I’ve heard points towards Pac fighting Clottey. Which is probably the hardest fight for Pac at this level.
And cutthoat that email sounds like an enormous pile of bullshit. I’m not saying there isn’t a 1 in a million chance that its possible… but I’m sure you can see dodgy it sounds.
[quote]duffyj2 wrote:
What’s all this talk about Foreman? Everything I’ve heard points towards Pac fighting Clottey. Which is probably the hardest fight for Pac at this level.
And cutthoat that email sounds like an enormous pile of bullshit. I’m not saying there isn’t a 1 in a million chance that its possible… but I’m sure you can see dodgy it sounds.[/quote]
It was on ESPN not long ago, all “fights” at this point are really just speculation though.
No, the winner of Mosley/Berto would be the biggest challenge. Other than Clottey being promoted by Top Rank I really don’t know why he’s being mentioned, he couldn’t even beat a badly cut Cotto and Cotto is far from his former self.
[quote]cutthoat25 wrote:
good try though goryo…LOL!
Did any one hear what Teddy Atlas reported last night on Friday Night Fights?
Well according to Teddy’s “source”, someone in Pacs camp sent an email to Floyds camp asking what would be the penalty if Pac did test positive for PEDs?"…“and if he did test positive could they keep it confidential? as it would only hurt the sport of boxing”…Atlas went on to say while the email isnt incriminating in anyway, it does seem fishy.
To me its pretty risky for ESPN to let Atlas speak on that bit of info, if the source wasnt some what reliable…right?[/quote]
That’s beyond stupid. I don’t think there’s anyone in Pacs camp that stupid enough to send an email like that. Unless it was Tiger Woods who sent the email and left a voice message too.
I hope Pac and May don’t fight after all this bullshit. Let them go their separate ways and fight 3 or 4 fights to equal the payday they would have on this one.
March 13:
Pac vs Clottey
May vs Malignaggi
Not quite the same ring to it.
[quote]fnf wrote:
[quote]cutthoat25 wrote:
good try though goryo…LOL!
Did any one hear what Teddy Atlas reported last night on Friday Night Fights?
Well according to Teddy’s “source”, someone in Pacs camp sent an email to Floyds camp asking what would be the penalty if Pac did test positive for PEDs?"…“and if he did test positive could they keep it confidential? as it would only hurt the sport of boxing”…Atlas went on to say while the email isnt incriminating in anyway, it does seem fishy.
To me its pretty risky for ESPN to let Atlas speak on that bit of info, if the source wasnt some what reliable…right?[/quote]
That’s beyond stupid. I don’t think there’s anyone in Pacs camp that stupid enough to send an email like that. Unless it was Tiger Woods who sent the email and left a voice message too.
I hope Pac and May don’t fight after all this bullshit. Let them go their separate ways and fight 3 or 4 fights to equal the payday they would have on this one.
March 13:
Pac vs Clottey
May vs Malignaggi
Not quite the same ring to it.[/quote]
It wouldn’t be stupid if the emails were supposed to be confidential and Golden Boy was contractually obligated to keep the emails confidential. Besides, it could just be a question for if Pacquiao unknowingly took a banned substance. Say he takes a cold medicine and the banned substances don’t leave his system before he’s tested, he could test positive for a banned substance inadvertently. If that were to happen Mayweather could have a field day with it.
I’m currently watching the video on this that’s supposed to have Atlas talking about it, I’ll give you guys the link if the description of the video is accurate and it actually has Atlas making the comments.
(Video) Teddy Atlas breaks down the Pacquiao-Mayweather blood tests and email shocker! There’s the video.
[quote]goldengloves wrote:
[quote]fnf wrote:
[quote]cutthoat25 wrote:
good try though goryo…LOL!
Did any one hear what Teddy Atlas reported last night on Friday Night Fights?
Well according to Teddy’s “source”, someone in Pacs camp sent an email to Floyds camp asking what would be the penalty if Pac did test positive for PEDs?"…“and if he did test positive could they keep it confidential? as it would only hurt the sport of boxing”…Atlas went on to say while the email isnt incriminating in anyway, it does seem fishy.
To me its pretty risky for ESPN to let Atlas speak on that bit of info, if the source wasnt some what reliable…right?[/quote]
That’s beyond stupid. I don’t think there’s anyone in Pacs camp that stupid enough to send an email like that. Unless it was Tiger Woods who sent the email and left a voice message too.
I hope Pac and May don’t fight after all this bullshit. Let them go their separate ways and fight 3 or 4 fights to equal the payday they would have on this one.
March 13:
Pac vs Clottey
May vs Malignaggi
Not quite the same ring to it.[/quote]
It wouldn’t be stupid if the emails were supposed to be confidential and Golden Boy was contractually obligated to keep the emails confidential. Besides, it could just be a question for if Pacquiao unknowingly took a banned substance. Say he takes a cold medicine and the banned substances don’t leave his system before he’s tested, he could test positive for a banned substance inadvertently. If that were to happen Mayweather could have a field day with it.
I’m currently watching the video on this that’s supposed to have Atlas talking about it, I’ll give you guys the link if the description of the video is accurate and it actually has Atlas making the comments.
(Video) Teddy Atlas breaks down the Pacquiao-Mayweather blood tests and email shocker! There’s the video.
[/quote]
Right now both those camps hate each other, so I wouldn’t think anything would be confidential.
I believe ESPN said they have until Monday when Pac and Clottey sign the deal to save the Mayweather fight.
[quote]fnf wrote:
[quote]goldengloves wrote:
[quote]fnf wrote:
[quote]cutthoat25 wrote:
good try though goryo…LOL!
Did any one hear what Teddy Atlas reported last night on Friday Night Fights?
Well according to Teddy’s “source”, someone in Pacs camp sent an email to Floyds camp asking what would be the penalty if Pac did test positive for PEDs?"…“and if he did test positive could they keep it confidential? as it would only hurt the sport of boxing”…Atlas went on to say while the email isnt incriminating in anyway, it does seem fishy.
To me its pretty risky for ESPN to let Atlas speak on that bit of info, if the source wasnt some what reliable…right?[/quote]
That’s beyond stupid. I don’t think there’s anyone in Pacs camp that stupid enough to send an email like that. Unless it was Tiger Woods who sent the email and left a voice message too.
I hope Pac and May don’t fight after all this bullshit. Let them go their separate ways and fight 3 or 4 fights to equal the payday they would have on this one.
March 13:
Pac vs Clottey
May vs Malignaggi
Not quite the same ring to it.[/quote]
It wouldn’t be stupid if the emails were supposed to be confidential and Golden Boy was contractually obligated to keep the emails confidential. Besides, it could just be a question for if Pacquiao unknowingly took a banned substance. Say he takes a cold medicine and the banned substances don’t leave his system before he’s tested, he could test positive for a banned substance inadvertently. If that were to happen Mayweather could have a field day with it.
I’m currently watching the video on this that’s supposed to have Atlas talking about it, I’ll give you guys the link if the description of the video is accurate and it actually has Atlas making the comments.
(Video) Teddy Atlas breaks down the Pacquiao-Mayweather blood tests and email shocker! There’s the video.
[/quote]
Right now both those camps hate each other, so I wouldn’t think anything would be confidential.
I believe ESPN said they have until Monday when Pac and Clottey sign the deal to save the Mayweather fight.[/quote]
Promoters are just promoters, man. Right now Arum is using this to try and gain support and try to get Mayweather to change his mind on the testing. It’s not too ridiculous to think there could be or was a certain level of confidentiality during the negotiations.
[quote]goldengloves wrote:
[quote]goryo13 wrote:
wait, what’s this???
Mayweather’s Drug History Caught Up With Him
http://www.8countnews.com/news/125/ARTICLE/2212/2010-01-09.html[/quote]
Lol, I figured this trash would make its way on here.
Oscar was using it before his fight with Bernard Hopkins because his hand was cut during training. You can use it during training with permission from the Nevada boxing commission, you just can’t use it during the fight. If Mayweather has used it during a fight he’d test positive for it, which he hasn’t. Also, Floyd Mayweather has wanted to fight in Vegas for as long as I’ve been watching him[his entire pro career]. Even when Arum was promoting him he used to turn down fights because he only wanted to fight in Vegas.[/quote]
cos that PED is banned somewhere… not in nevada though. figures.
what i would really like to ask Mayweather is this (courtesy to Joaquin Henson):
You began fighting as an amateur at 106 pounds in 1993 and now, youâ??re fighting as a pro at over 147. Pacquiao turned pro weighing 106 in 1995 and is now, fighting inside 147 pounds. What makes you think Pacquiao is taking steroids to increase muscle mass when youâ??ve taken the same route to move up in weight â?? unless you know something we donâ??t?
[quote]goldengloves wrote:
[quote]duffyj2 wrote:
What’s all this talk about Foreman? Everything I’ve heard points towards Pac fighting Clottey. Which is probably the hardest fight for Pac at this level.
And cutthoat that email sounds like an enormous pile of bullshit. I’m not saying there isn’t a 1 in a million chance that its possible… but I’m sure you can see dodgy it sounds.[/quote]
It was on ESPN not long ago, all “fights” at this point are really just speculation though.
No, the winner of Mosley/Berto would be the biggest challenge. Other than Clottey being promoted by Top Rank I really don’t know why he’s being mentioned, he couldn’t even beat a badly cut Cotto and Cotto is far from his former self.[/quote]
Obviously that is the biggest challenge. I am talking about the options availible to Pac right now. Look at any other thread on this matter and you’ll see me moaning that Shane didn’t get either of the superfights he deserved.
But as to Clottey being a nobody… He lost a fight to Cotto that many believe he won and many others believe was his to lose. He is a threat to anyone in the division.
I don’t see why everyone believes Cotto was washed up for these fights. He lost to a cheat and an extraodinary talent. What does that tell us? Nothing.
[quote]duffyj2 wrote:
[quote]goldengloves wrote:
[quote]duffyj2 wrote:
What’s all this talk about Foreman? Everything I’ve heard points towards Pac fighting Clottey. Which is probably the hardest fight for Pac at this level.
And cutthoat that email sounds like an enormous pile of bullshit. I’m not saying there isn’t a 1 in a million chance that its possible… but I’m sure you can see dodgy it sounds.[/quote]
It was on ESPN not long ago, all “fights” at this point are really just speculation though.
No, the winner of Mosley/Berto would be the biggest challenge. Other than Clottey being promoted by Top Rank I really don’t know why he’s being mentioned, he couldn’t even beat a badly cut Cotto and Cotto is far from his former self.[/quote]
Obviously that is the biggest challenge. I am talking about the options availible to Pac right now. Look at any other thread on this matter and you’ll see me moaning that Shane didn’t get either of the superfights he deserved.
But as to Clottey being a nobody… He lost a fight to Cotto that many believe he won and many others believe was his to lose. He is a threat to anyone in the division.
I don’t see why everyone believes Cotto was washed up for these fights. He lost to a cheat and an extraodinary talent. What does that tell us? Nothing. [/quote]
its not the fact that cotto lost, its more of how bad margarito beat him and damaged him…then agaist clottey he looked unimpressive and gun-shy(due to the Margarito beating)