[quote]Anthony Roberts wrote:
In the end, it’s speculation that’s at the heart of this. it’s pure speculation that x amount of weeks at y dose will allow z amount of your natural hormonal levels to come back. None of the resesarch provided supports it, unless you make huge leaps of logic.
Tapering, for the most part, has been abandoned (*with good reason) by AAS users everywhere.[/quote]
Just so all know this is a statement of your opinion. Your argumentative style has become quit evident. You like to pick on small details that often are not even important, and twist the arguments around. What you did to Bush is a good example.
when you say ‘*with good reason’ -what do you mean by this? that the Average AAS user actually knows what the hell he is doing? and that is your argument that the average AAS user knows better?
I guess going off AAS cold turkey is perferable, even though recovery is still impossible due to things like AAS levels that are still suppressive, your ‘lag time’ argument… e.t.c… This is all too insane!
You are only interested in your ego here, and the possiblility that you could very well be completely wrong eats away at you. Me, If I am wrong no biggie. My goal is in finding the healthiest and most successfull approach, and I believe quit firmly that I have found it.
Not only have I and others had success with this program, but the science of physiology and pharmocology back the theory, and so does the research.
When you first started arguing about this protocol you clearly stated that any amount of exogenous testosterone was 100% suppressive, and that you couldn’t begin recovery untill all was gone. That was the main point of clash between us. I have now proved you wrong, via research - The very research you claimed didn’t exsist. It doesn’t matter what blanket statement you make, you haven’t been able to come up with any proof that disproves my theory, and a lot of the initial doubters who had the guts to try the test taper have had great success. All have stated it was by far their best pct. Now that isn’t a fluke.
Now sorry if this form of pct isn’t ‘hard core’ enough for you.
Science is what it is, not what you want it to be.