Ok, let’s say we say one 16 week blast of test 500 is likely least harm reduction, per say…
That’s 8grams of test or 160 per week for a whole year. Let’s say your trt is 140.
Don’t you think 160 plus 140 = 300 test year round would just be as healthy?
Cons, you are on it nonstop
Pros: less fluctuations in homeostasis, regulating AI, etc. still same amount of hormones you’d run anyway.
It’s like what’s healthier, 10 weeks at 1000mg or 20 weeks at 500? I can see arguments both ways…
You tagged me and I’m not the one you should be tagging lol but, my uneducated newb opinion is one 16 week blast would be much better than year long blasting.
Anecdotally, exactly the same (i.e tanks HDL, like a 30-50% drop in reasonable dosages). Reasonable dosages equates to 2-300mg/wk. And YES, it works/delivers results. May not be equatible to 2-300mg testosterone per week, but it works and aesthetically the results far surpass that of testosterone.
Inb4 “need at least 6-800mg/wk”.
I usually only run 300mg of something like Mast next to my test. I guess I could run say 4-600 primo along with 3-400mg of test and give it a go. Maybe later this year.
Massive red flag. Good vendors don’t need to pay for advertising, the quality sells itself.
400mg test 600mg primo = a gram a week. Regardless of what you’d use at that point lipids will be skewed fairly significantly.
In a HYPOTHETICAL scenario my base of test is/was 75-100mg.
Primo would appear perfect on paper, but it whacks lipids fairly significantly.
But as I’ve said, this scenario is purely hypothetical #natty4life #leftventricularhypertrophy #prematureatherosclerosis #comorbiditiesassociatedwiththenattylifestyle
Seriously, wouldn’t 250 test year round be as healthy as one 16 week blast of test 500?
Who knows.
I am cruising higher than I need to (200 mg/wk). This is because I am going for strength and muscle at this part of my life. I am also running blasts with about as much time cruise as blast. I am only running moderate dosages for blasts, as that is the risk I am okay with (at least the perceived risk). I’ll probably be on this course for 3 years more (been doing it a year). After that it will be TRT in normal ranges (high normal at trough), and maybe one short, low dose blast a year if I get sloppy.
Running 250 mg year round may or may not be worse. If you have hematocrit about range all year, and high blood pressure year round, then it might be worse.
Perhaps getting labs at a few different dosages would let you know how bad is this current dose for me. Lipids look good, hematocrit looks good, liver and kidney good, and BP good, the dose is probably not a huge risk. If those are terrible, you might want to change course.