Beck 5 11 2010: Where have we gone in the last year?
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,208.new.html#new
Well I wasn’t even a thought in my Grandparent’s head during the 60’s, yet your reason sounds better to me than anything else I have heard. I can and will believe your statement until I am shown something that makes more logical sense. FYI I doubt that will ever happen, not because I am close minded btw ; )
My father used to say ‘my grandfathers generation was the greatest generation of all time.’ Now his generation is the source of some/many of the problems we face today. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony ; )
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
The destruction of the family in the 60’s was the final ingredient needed for the success of the assault on this nation which had been going on since the beginning of the 20th century. We could have never been brought to the brink like this while strong, committed, faithful families and the character that they engender were still ascendant. The sexual revolution of the 1960’s was the death knell of everything this country was founded to be. The sick and twisted idea that the founders of this nation wrote their constitution to support the wanton slaughter of one’s own unborn children was the next inevitable chapter.
Nobody, and I do mean nobody will convince me otherwise. This is clearer to me than the sky being up.[/quote]
I forgot to add this picture, plus I wasn’t sure of where else to post it = )
In some instances you could put Reid and Pelosi on the top rung there.
Beck today.
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,209.new.html#new
Beck: Founder’s Fridays. George Whitfield, whoseletter responding to John Wesley in 1740 or 41 was one of the great refutations of Arminianism of all time.
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,205.new.html#new
Beck and O’Reilly geting a bit heated over the question of whether legal American citizens accused of terrorism should be mirandized.
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,191.new.html#new
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
Beck and O’Reilly geting a bit heated over the question of whether legal American citizens accused of terrorism should be mirandized.
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,191.new.html#new[/quote]
I wholeheartedly support Beck here. It is a way for the administration to detain whoever they deem to be a “terrorist”.
[quote]formerfatboy wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
Beck and O’Reilly geting a bit heated over the question of whether legal American citizens accused of terrorism should be mirandized.
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,191.new.html#new[/quote]
I wholeheartedly support Beck here. It is a way for the administration to detain whoever they deem to be a “terrorist”. [/quote]
I do too. Also from the standpoint that legal citizens, regardless of background or how long, still have to be treated as citizens.
Legal citizens must be treated as such. It is the principle. We DO NOT want to start down the road of modifying the rights of unconvicted citizens, no matter how loathsome they may be. That is the slipperiest slope of all. I might support revoking citizenship for a naturalized immigrant if it can be shown upon conviction that the motivation for their pursuing citizenship in the first place was to inflict harm on the United States. However, once we allow politicians to deny rights to legal citizens based upon anything other than full due process of law you can bet your last dime the criteria for doing so will begin to broaden at an alarming rate. None for me thanks.
Chris Wallace interviews Newt Gingrich on his book: To Save America: Stopping Obama’s Secular-Socialist Machine
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,192.new.html#new
Glenn Beck: 5_17_10 with 40 minutes and 7 seconds of actual context.
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,209.new.html#new
Another good Beck today.
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,209.new.html#new
And today, He pushed it a little today, but I do concur that this regime is all about the globalization of America.
http://gregnmary.gotdns.com:8080/index.php/topic,209.new.html#new
John S. Just for you I’ll have Bill O’Reilly’s interview with Rand Paul later. I have a generally favorable impression of him thus far.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
John S. Just for you I’ll have Bill O’Reilly’s interview with Rand Paul later. I have a generally favorable impression of him thus far.[/quote]
I just watched it. Its great knowing we will have two Pauls in office.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
And today, He pushed it a little today…[/quote]
???[/quote]
Some of the VERY short video clips will bring the accusation of taking liberties with context. He didn’t do that and I know he only has 40 minutes n change each day, but I would figure out a better way to document my points. Of course I’ve never had a TV show so it’s easy for me to say. The mere use of the word “global” is, in my opinion not enough to firmly establish what he’s driving at, which I do believe is happening BTW. That segment came off as a bit cheap and aimed at those who already agree with him. It wouldn’t have convinced me if I were a critical Beck noob watching with a reasonably open mind. Especially the Obama clips. Some of the others were better.
I treat everybody the same. I like Beck alot and I think he is the most accurate guy around at illustrating what is going on, but I will anaylize him the same way I would David Axlerod.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]John S. wrote:
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
John S. Just for you I’ll have Bill O’Reilly’s interview with Rand Paul later. I have a generally favorable impression of him thus far.[/quote]
I just watched it. Its great knowing we will have two Pauls in office.[/quote]
He’s his daddy’s boy, aint he? Spitting image with his mannerisms and speech patterns.
I like him.[/quote]
So far I like him too. He impresses as actually having a sounder grasp of reality than the old man. I thought his response to the question about force and Iran was somewhat brilliant. In summary “regardless of what I ACTUALLY would do, only a fool would allow an enemy the perception that there is ANYTHING I’d be unwilling to do, up to and including military force.” Very good and quite wise and circumspect. Especially compared to his Dad who probably say that until they nuke someone we sit on our porch with our shotgun.