Occupy Wall Street

[quote]benos4752 wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
Do you get what I’m saying? Its not that the older generation fucked things up because they’re old, or because they planned to - but the fact remains, they fucked things up. Yet nobody is railing for them to “step up and take responsibility.” [/quote]

You are right, the people who enacted the policies are the older generations. However, where you lose any and all credibility is the fact that you wont admit to the simple fact that age is irrelevant in this discussion. It was the policies. The exact same policies that the OWS would have, and want to, enact if they were in power. That is why age is irrelevant, a fact that you seem to be able to fit into your thick skull. Yes, you are 100% right; the older generation enacted the policies. But, what you like to continually dodge is the fact that the younger generation sitting in the streets like third world refugees would have done the same exact things had they been in power.

Age is irrelevant, policy is to blame. That is what TB is trying to say, and what you are trying hard to ignore. Can’t say that I blame you, if all the beliefs that I held dear were being torn down in front of my eyes for the fallacies they are, I’d try to hide from the facts too.[/quote]

So the older generation enacted the bad policies, yet its the younger generations “entitlement mentality” that is the problem?

Policy isn’t to blame because policy isnt a fucking autonomous entity - the people who ENACTED the policy are to blame.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]benos4752 wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:
Do you get what I’m saying? Its not that the older generation fucked things up because they’re old, or because they planned to - but the fact remains, they fucked things up. Yet nobody is railing for them to “step up and take responsibility.” [/quote]

You are right, the people who enacted the policies are the older generations. However, where you lose any and all credibility is the fact that you wont admit to the simple fact that age is irrelevant in this discussion. It was the policies. The exact same policies that the OWS would have, and want to, enact if they were in power. That is why age is irrelevant, a fact that you seem to be able to fit into your thick skull. Yes, you are 100% right; the older generation enacted the policies. But, what you like to continually dodge is the fact that the younger generation sitting in the streets like third world refugees would have done the same exact things had they been in power.

Age is irrelevant, policy is to blame. That is what TB is trying to say, and what you are trying hard to ignore. Can’t say that I blame you, if all the beliefs that I held dear were being torn down in front of my eyes for the fallacies they are, I’d try to hide from the facts too.[/quote]

So the older generation enacted the bad policies, yet its the younger generations “entitlement mentality” that is the problem?

Policy isn’t to blame because policy isnt a fucking autonomous entity - the people who ENACTED the policy are to blame.[/quote]

First of all, I don’t blame my generation for the problem. What happened was out of our control because we weren’t in power. BUT, my generation (or some of it) is to blame for how we reacted to it.

“I was always told to go to college and I’d get a good job. My teachers always said that menial labor was below me and only for idiots.” Boo fucking woo. I’m the same generation, and surprisingly, I’m not sitting in the street like a refugee and broke and blaming banks.

First, I’ve never been told that ‘only idiots and failures flip burgers (or fill in other minimum wage job)’. I’ve only ever been told that only idiots and failures flip burgers at 45 after dropping out of high school. And even if I had been told the former, I’m smart enough to go…hmm, that doesn’t sound right…I’m smart enough to go, “Instead of taking out student loans and getting in debt, I’ll work, and go to community college. Get my transfer stuff done. Work, save money, and go to university a couple years later, out of my own pocket.”

And when I get out, if it’s hard for me to find a job in my field, I’m not going to go to cry about it, I’ll recert and jump back on ambulances. Or I’ll go work in the fields again. Or hell, I’ll go flip burgers.

That’s what is pissing me off about these guys and gals. Instead of of going, “Shit, there are no jobs in my field in this area…well, I need to make money…so, in the meantime, I’m going to go do _____. And then I can wait for my career to open up; or look out of my area; or search for something else that I’m qualified for.”

Instead, they sit in the street, “Waaaa, I can’t get a job with my flower arranging degree. I’m going to sit here in the street and cry about there being no jobs…What? Go flip burgers? Fuck you! I’m to good for that!” And this isn’t just some media bias or something (fat chance with this liberal media in this country). I hear classmates and etc saying shit like this all the time (not those words, but the general message).

That’s what I blame on my generation, not the situation itself, but our reaction to the situation. I don’t give a shit how many times an adult growing up told you certain jobs were below, so what? You need the money, go do the work. There are lots of jobs available, if your willing to do/find them. Hell, this last summer, my dad needed at least two more hands out in the field…and even though everyone whines about needing a job, no one, from anywhere around us, came to him asking for a job. Even my friend, who was on unemployment, wouldn’t come out and work, and he pays well; $10.50/hour with no experience or anything needed…but, you have to work hard, and long, and get covered in dirt and dust…so no one wants to do it.

There are jobs out there. But if you’re going to refuse to work because your career field is impacted and you view certain jobs as ‘below you’, well, then you are shit out of luck…don’t come whining to me about no jobs if you’re unwilling to bust your ass for a year or two doing something that isn’t ideal.

And yes, let me say it again, maybe if it is said enough, you’ll finally get it. Yes, the people who enacted the policies are to blame for the policies. But the policies are to blame for the outcome. And, again, age is irrelevant. Yes, the people who enacted the policies are older than my generation, but that doesn’t matter, because a lot of the OWS crowd and other liberals supported those policies, or the politicians who enacted them, and would have enacted those same policies if they had been in charge. So yes, the older generation enacted the policies, but the ideology and policies are what are to blame.

[quote]kamui wrote:

[quote]
Who set the bad policies in place? (The older generation)
Who was in an actionable position to stop those bad policies? (The older generation)
Who benefitted from those bad policies? (The older generation)
Who is disadvantaged as a result of those bad policies? (The younger generation)[/quote]

don’t forget :
who didn’t make enough babies to pay for their own bad policies ? (the older generation)

forget economics, politics and ideology for a moment.
The underlying causes of this mess are demographic. [/quote]

This is an excellent point.

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
Since you all are talking about the financial crisis. If you haven’t read this yet, it’s worth a look over:

http://fcic.law.stanford.edu/report

[/quote]

[quote]kamui wrote:

don’t forget :
who didn’t make enough babies to pay for their own bad policies ? (the older generation)

forget economics, politics and ideology for a moment.
The underlying causes of this mess are demographic. [/quote]

Certainly, to an extent - with respect to the entitlement crisis. But not the housing crisis that caused the economic meltdown.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

Because you want to place blame on the younger generation while entirely ignoring the older generations part (responsibility!) in all of it.

Sure, if you’re looking for what to blame, you can blame bad ideas/ideology. But if you’re talking about who to blame - sorry, its not the OWS crowd responsible for our wrecked economy.[/quote]

No, I am not. This isn’t the younger generation’s fault - I’ve said so over and over.

If you want to look at who to blame, the age - again - is irrelevant.

I mean, I get it. You won’t touch ideology. You won’t admit the policies are bad, because that would entail admitting policies you are sympathetic to are bad. But be honest.

“Old people” are just serving as a boogeyman for you because you won’t address the actual cause of the economic meltdown.

[/quote]

You keep missing the point.

Who set the bad policies in place? (The older generation)
Who was in an actionable position to stop those bad policies? (The older generation)
Who benefitted from those bad policies? (The older generation)
Who is disadvantaged as a result of those bad policies? (The younger generation)

Yet Lama and company want to scream that the problem is the younger generation “not taking personal responsibility” and you want to rail about the “entitlement mentality”.

Since its the older generation who fucked things up, shouldnt the older generation take responsibility for fixing it?

[/quote]

What do you mean by ‘bad policies’?

The ‘too easy credit’ policies that got too many people in over their heads or the ‘entitlement policies’ that help create a lazy dependence on hand-outs?

BTW, neither of those were mandatory. People CHOOSE to play in them or not. Again, it gets back to individual CHOICE. The problem is lots of people wrongly think they don’t have other CHOICES and blame ‘policy’.

[quote]Adam Bomb wrote:
CappedAndPlanIt you do realize that there were old people who said that everything that was happening was a bad idea? - YouTube

You are still placing the blame on the old, the blame should be on Old Liberals who want touchy feely bullshit. Liberals enacted the housing bubble when the changed all the rules at fannie mae and freddie mac. Old Conservatives were saying Noooooooooooooooooooo the whole time. Ohh yea then the federal government said to banks that didn’t want to fall inline “if you don’t want to lend to who we say to we will sue you”. [/quote]

Agree

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:

[quote]kamui wrote:

don’t forget :
who didn’t make enough babies to pay for their own bad policies ? (the older generation)

forget economics, politics and ideology for a moment.
The underlying causes of this mess are demographic. [/quote]

Certainly, to an extent - with respect to the entitlement crisis. But not the housing crisis that caused the economic meltdown.
[/quote]

So again I ask - where is the shouting and pounding of fists over the people responsible for the housing crisis to “take responsibility”?

Ok, ok - I get it. First, blame the younger generation (they just aren’t taking responsbility). But when its pointed out that the problems were actually caused by the older generation, we need to specificy that it was the liberals of the older generation responsible.

Typical.

Again it is Policy not Generational. Fiscal Conservatives / Libertarians were fighting against it.

Do you think that mortgages should be given to anyone?

Do you think that we should tax Job Producers more?

CappedAndPlanIt won’t address the actual issue…

Typical.

Maybe you should go live in greece.

[quote]Adam Bomb wrote:
Again it is Policy not Generational. Fiscal Conservatives / Libertarians were fighting against it.

Do you think that mortgages should be given to anyone?

Do you think that we should tax Job Producers more?

CappedAndPlanIt won’t address the actual issue…

Typical.

Maybe you should go live in greece.[/quote]

No, mortages shouldn’t be given to anyone. The CRA was a terrible idea.

So is giving student loans to everybody, for everything.

My point still stands: I’ve seen a lot of shouting that the OWS crowd needs to “Take responsibility” for something that their parents caused - where’s the shouting for the people responsible for the crisis to “take responsibility”?

And don’t try to feed me that “Its all the liberals!” bullshit, you’re telling me those bullying liberals forced everybody into it? There weren’t enough conservatives to stop it… or were the conservatives too busy getting rich off bad policy they didn’t even agree with (which is arguably worse)?

Exactly. There weren’t enough conservatives. Plenty of R.I.N.O.s though who got rich…but conservatives? No.

[quote]benos4752 wrote:

Exactly. There weren’t enough conservatives. Plenty of R.I.N.O.s though who got rich…but conservatives? No.[/quote]

Good point.

I agree that, to one extent or another, everyone has to take responsibility for their lives. Everyone should work hard and spend reasonably. You’ll get no argument from me there.

It just bothers me that one generation gets fucked over by the generation that came before them, and they’re expected to clean up the mess. And when they actually get together and do something about it, they’re told its an “entitlement mentality”.

Its more of a “Hey, you fucked up the economy, got rich doing it, and now we’re all fucked. So fuck you” mentality.

You mean like not being able to stop the health care bill from being passed? Yes a congressional and senate minority where the Liberals are passing whatever they want. All the while conservatives are screaming from roof tops that what is being passed is catastrophic for our economy.

Wait, and now making money off of policy you do not agree with is wrong? I own rental homes as investments, we rent them out Section 8(Fed Gov Paid Rent). I personally think the system is fucked and creates perpetual nanny state dependance, but guess what if I can get my tax dollars back in my pocket as income I sure as shit am going to do it.

Where do you get your information from? the people that pushed these policies in the first place?
http://www.nationalreview.com/campaign-spot/279869/barney-frank-community-reinvestment-act-was-republican-failure

Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee Barney Frank

[quote]Adam Bomb wrote:
You mean like not being able to stop the health care bill from being passed? Yes a congressional and senate minority where the Liberals are passing whatever they want. All the while conservatives are screaming from roof tops that what is being passed is catastrophic for our economy.
[/quote]

http://articles.businessinsider.com/2009-06-27/wall_street/30009234_1_mortgage-standards-lending-standards-mortgage-rates

“What’s more, George W. Bush was a major proponent of the kind of mortgages that banks had started making under the CRA. He urged low-to-no doc mortgages and the elimination of downpayments, just like the CRA regulators had long done. â??We certainly don’t want there to be a fine print preventing people from owning their home,â?? the President said in a 2002 speech. â??We can change the print, and we’ve got to.â??”

So, no, the whole mess wasn’t just the fault of liberals.

So you’re supporting a system you think is fucked, and contributing to the “nanny state dependance” you so vehemently disagree with.

You really stand behind what you believe. Inspiring.

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:

[quote]CappedAndPlanIt wrote:

If I promised you 5,000 dollars to do backbreaking manual labor for ten days, ten hours each day, and, at the end of it, I explained that I didn’t have the money because I gambled it away at a casino, do you think you’d be a little upset?[/quote]

Well, this would be an enforceable contract.

And your comparison is just plain goofy - who do you know that suffered through “backbreaking labor” to get a college degree? You can sleepwalk your way to a B average. It isn’t that a degree isn’t a good thing - just don’t pretend that people have to crawl through broken glass and hellfire to get one. It’s more like a 4 year party.

And the money hasn’t necessarily been gambled away - it’s simply been earmarked to pay for the retirement of the Baby Boomers.[/quote]

I love when people pick apart an analogy in order to avoid the point being made. I mean, life isn’t manufactured by Russel Stover, it doesn’t melt in the heat, and you can’t buy it at a store – life isn’t like a box of chocolates at all!!

Point is, younger generation was told by older generation that, if they did X, they would get Y. They did X, and now they can’t get Y because the older generation fucked things up (or is keeping it all for themselves).

Terribly sorry that “Hey, mom, dad, grandma, grandpa, and every other person who’s ever given me advice on the topic - you said I should go to college no matter what, and now I’m fucked” isn’t an “enforceable contract”.

[/quote]

The bubonic plague, followed by the Goths, Vandals, Lombards, Franks, Vikings, Sarazens, and of course warring feudal Lords…

Well, they think they got it though because they need to hunker down and wait for an economic rebound, only able to afford a second hand flatscreen?

The horror…

This was a funny read