Obama, You've Been Served

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
61

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Good for the Catholic Church I applaud the stand that they are taking in sticking up for all denominations in fighting back against the overreaching Obamacare. It was a horrible idea to begin with and when 67% of the country were (and still are)against it Obama should have stepped back. Instead he shoved through a multi-thousand page bill that no one read. And he got away with it because both houses of congress were controlled by the democrats.

Catholics all around the country should remember this attack on their religious freedom on election day![/quote]

“Catholic Priest Says A Schoolgirl Who Went Missing In 1983 Was Kidnapped For Vatican Sex Parties.”

http://getthetruthout.icyboards.net/showthread.php?tid=2231&pid=6478

This has been going viral on many sites and in the news.

These people are all devils, every one.

I’m not religious but the language of the religious sometimes best expresses an idea.

Devilty…pure devilty…

[/quote]

Someone doth protest too much, methinks.

How’s that vibrator been working out for your daughter, HH?[/quote]

Wow, you sure answered me! Your religion is false, demands that you suspend your brain and become a robot, is run mostly by banking swindlers, homosexual perverts and pedophiles…but you sure showed me!!

[/quote]

I just wanted you to recall what defamation feels like.

Was that unfair of me? How about the probably hundreds of other posters in the years since that infamous post of yours who used that incident as an indictment upon your character? Were they fair? Were they justified in their accusations of you? As a pervert and likely pedophile, yourself; perhaps even incestuously inclined? Were those accusations just?

We weren’t the only ones, but the Catholics on this board stood by you and even defended you when it got really bad for you over here. And now you march back in with your condescension and your narcissistic God-complex, to people who’ve been nothing but good to you, and you shit all over their system of beliefs, call them brainwashed robots, caricature basically all Catholic priests as leering creatures from an Ed Roth cartoon. Unprovoked, mind you! The priests, who are our friends and mentors, and sometimes, as in my case, our family, you call “devils, every one.”

I don’t know if your entire posting persona has been one big, fantastic troll for the past ten years, or if this place or the people here actually mean anything at all to you. Whether you mean it in earnest or you are some kind of creepy, obsessed prankster, the end result is the same. You have pissed on and alienated yourself from almost every single member of this site except maybe your weird buddy newbatman. Take a step back, for just a second, please, and think about that.

My previous post was not about scoring an internet point off of you. We get enough Catholic bashers here that your posts don’t make a damned bit of difference one way or the other. Most of them have more coherent arguments than you. I don’t have to “show you,” anything HH. You do a fine job of it yourself, with every new post you make.

62

[quote]honest_lifter wrote:
No apology needed. I wasn’t using this “priest” as a generalization of what all priests are. I am very familiar with being singled out as a religion, but as a friendly reminder, Ecc 7:9 “Do not be quickly provoked in your spirit, for anger resides in the lap of fools.”

I’m out.[/quote]

Heheh. Duly noted. Take care.

63

[quote]Cortes wrote:
My previous post was not about scoring an internet point off of you. We get enough Catholic bashers here that your posts don’t make a damned bit of difference one way or the other. Most of them have more coherent arguments than you. I don’t have to “show you,” anything HH. You do a fine job of it yourself, with every new post you make.
[/quote]

I only speak the truth. You answered me by calling upon a brilliant old trolling thread I posted – which took a lot of work setting up – the intellect you thereby displayed got an appropriate answer.

If you gents want to ignore me and have a Catholic circle jerk, go ahead. Solipsism and religion go hand in hand.

64

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Headhunter’s brain macaroni salad aside, this entire thing has been a disaster for Obama. The only reason the contraception mandate was rolled out when it was rolled out was that it was part of the “war on women” meme the campaign was trying to score points with. Obama wanted to pander to the women’s vote - who, if you listen to Obama, isn’t a monolothic vote, but he decided to pander to it all the same as if it was.

It fizzled. The “war on women” meme and the contraception mandate didn’t move the needle in his direction, and what does he have to show for the effort? A First Amendment lawsuit that will not only create a robust debate about constitutional overreach (which is bad for Obama) but it will also lay to rest that the opponents aren’t part of any “war on women” (not that there was anyone left believing that anyway, but the platform of the lawsuit will be used to re-tell that story with great effect).

Now voters get to take stock with yet another lawsuit against the administration for overreach. Overreach, overreach, overreach - it will sound like a broken record. Obamacare. Contraception mandate. War Powers Act on Libya (no lawsuit, but easy pickings to talk about).

A disaster.[/quote]

Let’s all ignore him, like everyone else.[/quote]

You all want to ignore TB? Why?

Was it because he read Atlas Shrugged once when he 15, never read it again, then saw fit to denounce it many years later? We KNOW he was brilliant at 15 so he was capable of passing judgment on things way back then.

65

Related to lawsuits against the government by religious groups, what are your thoughts on this?

66

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:
My previous post was not about scoring an internet point off of you. We get enough Catholic bashers here that your posts don’t make a damned bit of difference one way or the other. Most of them have more coherent arguments than you. I don’t have to “show you,” anything HH. You do a fine job of it yourself, with every new post you make.
[/quote]

I only speak the truth. You answered me by calling upon a brilliant old trolling thread I posted – which took a lot of work setting up – the intellect you thereby displayed got an appropriate answer.

If you gents want to ignore me and have a Catholic circle jerk, go ahead. Solipsism and religion go hand in hand.
[/quote]

Cool. You have fun with newbatman.

67

[quote]atypical1 wrote:
Related to lawsuits against the government by religious groups, what are your thoughts on this?

Damn I like the Werewolf logo! The whole thing is absurd though. I can tell you first hand that none of the marines of 122 give a shit what their name is. It’s funny how people that are in no way affiliated with the Corps, or military for that matter, care so much.

I guess we’re just supposed to kill the enemy. Heaven forbid we both offend and kill them.

68

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
The vast majority of priests or pastors would love nothing more than to have wild sex with a bunch of 15 year olds. [/quote]

That is a vicious and ignorant statement to make, and one that you cannot support. [/quote]

Are you kidding? Americans rarely go into the priesthood anymore because now they CAN have all sorts of sexual adventures. They can indulge. Before, they had to try and repress their animalistic desires by fleeing to the cloth. The priests and preachers that are in there now are pissed because they are missing out.

Why do you think very few Americans go into the priesthood? There’s no point. They can’t be pedos yet but can be homos. They even get Leftists to fight for their ‘rights’ to be perverts!

The Church has built up this image in you guys’ minds of a vow of poverty and no sex and all purity and light. What a bunch of horseshit! Win the lottery and watch 'em flock around you. Watch how some sleazy old whoremonger eyeballs the young ladies/men in church – I’ve watched this numerous times, Zeb. Watch the priest after he hands the Communion wafer to a young person; the old lecher watches their asses as they walk away!

I’ll never go to church again ever, that’s for sure.
[/quote]

I’m not a Catholic HH, but I do have respect for the Catholic Church and what it has stood for this many years. But primarily for what it has stood against, abortion, homosexual marriage and many other things. As for horrible comments, I’ll just have to shake my head and walk away. With one closing comment, if you are not purposely trolling, I feel very sorry for you.

69

[quote]ZEB wrote:

With one closing comment, if you are not purposely trolling, I feel very sorry for you.[/quote]

I pity him even if he is purposely trolling. What value is there in spending this much time “trolling”? Your life has to be pretty empty. It’s pitiful.

70

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

Let’s all ignore him, like everyone else.

You all want to ignore TB? Why?

Was it because he read Atlas Shrugged once when he 15, never read it again, then saw fit to denounce it many years later? We KNOW he was brilliant at 15 so he was capable of passing judgment on things way back then.
[/quote]

Ayn Rand was a first class idiot. The fact that she is a capitalist only serves to prove that not all capitalists are smart. I liken her philosophical ‘discoveries’ to a kid who learns how to take off his own diaper. It seems brilliant at the time, until you figure out that everybody already knew that.
She is certainly not academically revered… Mainly because she had little to no point. She was a troll to boot.

Now your on ignore…

71

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

With one closing comment, if you are not purposely trolling, I feel very sorry for you.[/quote]

I pity him even if he is purposely trolling. What value is there in spending this much time “trolling”? Your life has to be pretty empty. It’s pitiful.[/quote]

This takes 10 minutes per day.

You guys know I am right, that all religion is just a scam. You just won’t say so because your Internet friends won’t like you anymore.

How lonely and empty is that? LOL!

Now I’m off to a graduation party (not my son’s yet) at USNA. Yep, poor old ‘empty life’ me…

72

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Headhunter wrote:

Let’s all ignore him, like everyone else.

You all want to ignore TB? Why?

Was it because he read Atlas Shrugged once when he 15, never read it again, then saw fit to denounce it many years later? We KNOW he was brilliant at 15 so he was capable of passing judgment on things way back then.
[/quote]

Ayn Rand was a first class idiot. The fact that she is a capitalist only serves to prove that not all capitalists are smart. I liken her philosophical ‘discoveries’ to a kid who learns how to take off his own diaper. It seems brilliant at the time, until you figure out that everybody already knew that.
She is certainly not academically revered… Mainly because she had little to no point. She was a troll to boot.

Now your on ignore…[/quote]

you’re…not ‘your’. Russian immigrant and she wrote better than you can…

73

I don not know why that got stuck in my brain but I think if someone had incestuous inclinations he would not get his daughter a vibrator.

Because, what would be the point?

74

[quote]atypical1 wrote:
Related to lawsuits against the government by religious groups, what are your thoughts on this?

I thought atheists weren’t religious?

75

I wonder who is actually behind the great right wing surge to destroy “Obamacare”? It certainly can’t be the millions of uninsured Americans that spend their days dreading that the cough they’ve had for 2 weeks isn’t emphysema or cancer, I’m sure it’s not the families bankrupted by skyrocketing medical costs and outrageous pharmaceutical co-pays? If it’s not "Joe Sixpack then who is it? Hmmmm, Insurance Companies and their lobbyists protecting their profits, outdated religious institutions protecting their religious dogma, Corporations more worried about decimal points on an earnings statement than the health of their employees, customers, suppliers etc. It is the big man trying to screw the little man (again) and through a cleverly marketed, well designed series of misleading attack ads the people with the $ have convinced the sheeple that their best interest is to be …at risk? If you are against Obamacare I would have to question your patriotism, I question your commitment to your fellow Americans, and I question your sanity, the costs of the uninsured are transferred to you and I anyway, wouldn’t it be better to pay for care that is proactive and preventative rather than reactive and palliative?

76

[quote]BrianHanson wrote:
I wonder who is actually behind the great right wing surge to destroy “Obamacare”? It certainly can’t be the millions of uninsured Americans that spend their days dreading that the cough they’ve had for 2 weeks isn’t emphysema or cancer, I’m sure it’s not the families bankrupted by skyrocketing medical costs and outrageous pharmaceutical co-pays? If it’s not "Joe Sixpack then who is it? Hmmmm, Insurance Companies and their lobbyists protecting their profits, outdated religious institutions protecting their religious dogma, Corporations more worried about decimal points on an earnings statement than the health of their employees, customers, suppliers etc. It is the big man trying to screw the little man (again) and through a cleverly marketed, well designed series of misleading attack ads the people with the $ have convinced the sheeple that their best interest is to be …at risk? If you are against Obamacare I would have to question your patriotism, I question your commitment to your fellow Americans, and I question your sanity, the costs of the uninsured are transferred to you and I anyway, wouldn’t it be better to pay for care that is proactive and preventative rather than reactive and palliative? [/quote]

Are you an idiot?

Those of us who have to pay for others to have that insurance are against it. (eye roll)

Now tell me again how much more important indurance is over food shelter and a properly running car.

Hey…why don’t we supply those things too?

Yeah, that’s the ticket. Then we will all be equal.

HA …

77

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
So, let’s talk about the elephant in the room.

I don’t know if Obama’s stance on gay marriage has been talked about, but do you think it has helped or hurt him ?[/quote]

Didn’t know the elephant was in this room.[/quote]

I think he means the distraction in the room.[/quote]

Ah yes. The government discriminating against its citizens under the law is always such a meaningless and distracting issue. Has no relevance on our lives at all!

78

[quote]Tumbles wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
So, let’s talk about the elephant in the room.

I don’t know if Obama’s stance on gay marriage has been talked about, but do you think it has helped or hurt him ?[/quote]

Didn’t know the elephant was in this room.[/quote]

I think he means the distraction in the room.[/quote]

Ah yes. The government discriminating against its citizens under the law is always such a meaningless and distracting issue. Has no relevance on our lives at all![/quote]

Who is being discriminated against, and how? Be specific.

79

And real quick before I walk out the door. @raj in particular but anyone is free to answer:

Are you contending that homosexual married relationships are EQUAL to heterosexual ones?

Like, exactly as important?

80

Sorry, disregard the last two posts here. I moved the responses to the Traditional Marriage thread to avoid clutter.