Texas Chainsaw 3D due out this January.
[quote]paulieserafini wrote:
how in the eff do i watch teddy bear, cant find it anywhere[/quote]
It got a limited theatrical release about a month ago, so itâs not available for rentalâŠyet.
Latest trailer for The Hobbit: An Unexpected SequelâŠI mean Journey
No sign of old toasty tonsils.
[quote]roybot wrote:
Latest trailer for The Hobbit: An Unexpected SequelâŠI mean Journey
No sign of old toasty tonsils. [/quote]
Is anyone in the world actually happy itâs going to be THREE movies?
[quote]Gmoore17 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
Latest trailer for The Hobbit: An Unexpected SequelâŠI mean Journey
No sign of old toasty tonsils. [/quote]
Is anyone in the world actually happy itâs going to be THREE movies?[/quote]
Yes. New Line.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Gmoore17 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
Latest trailer for The Hobbit: An Unexpected SequelâŠI mean Journey
No sign of old toasty tonsils. [/quote]
Is anyone in the world actually happy itâs going to be THREE movies?[/quote]
Yes. New Line. [/quote]
Me personally as long as it is done well I could care less. I have loved and read/reread these books for the last 25 years, so to me its about quality and dont care about the quantity.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Gmoore17 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
Latest trailer for The Hobbit: An Unexpected SequelâŠI mean Journey
No sign of old toasty tonsils. [/quote]
Is anyone in the world actually happy itâs going to be THREE movies?[/quote]
Yes. New Line. [/quote]
Me personally as long as it is done well I could care less. I have loved and read/reread these books for the last 25 years, so to me its about quality and dont care about the quantity. [/quote]
Iâm just exaggerating for effect, like I do with Michael Bay movies.
If team Jackson can deliver each movie with perfect pacing, then Iâll consider the decision to make a trilogy a good idea; if the story comes in bloated and over-long and too prequelly, then they shouldâve stuck to a two-movie limit (even if that meant they couldnât snag that lucrative and critically lauded golden goose of the movie industry - the trilogy).
Have to wait and see. Not happy that Legolas is making an appearance though. Not so much the character, more the actor: Or-bland-o Bloom.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Gmoore17 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
Latest trailer for The Hobbit: An Unexpected SequelâŠI mean Journey
No sign of old toasty tonsils. [/quote]
Is anyone in the world actually happy itâs going to be THREE movies?[/quote]
Yes. New Line. [/quote]
Me personally as long as it is done well I could care less. I have loved and read/reread these books for the last 25 years, so to me its about quality and dont care about the quantity. [/quote]
Iâm just exagerrating for effect, like I do with Michael Bay movies.
If team Jackson can deliver each movie with perfect pacing, then Iâll consider the decision to make a trilogy a good idea; if the story comes in bloated and over-long and too prequelly, then they shouldâve stuck to a two-movie limit (even if that meant they couldnât snag that lucrative and critically lauded golden goose of the movie industry - the trilogy).
Have to wait and see. Not happy that Legolas is making an appearance though. Not so much the character, more the actor: Or-bland-o Bloom. [/quote]
Fuck didnt know that he was in this, please say its just a bit part.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Gmoore17 wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
Latest trailer for The Hobbit: An Unexpected SequelâŠI mean Journey
No sign of old toasty tonsils. [/quote]
Is anyone in the world actually happy itâs going to be THREE movies?[/quote]
Yes. New Line. [/quote]
Me personally as long as it is done well I could care less. I have loved and read/reread these books for the last 25 years, so to me its about quality and dont care about the quantity. [/quote]
Iâm just exagerrating for effect, like I do with Michael Bay movies.
If team Jackson can deliver each movie with perfect pacing, then Iâll consider the decision to make a trilogy a good idea; if the story comes in bloated and over-long and too prequelly, then they shouldâve stuck to a two-movie limit (even if that meant they couldnât snag that lucrative and critically lauded golden goose of the movie industry - the trilogy).
Have to wait and see. Not happy that Legolas is making an appearance though. Not so much the character, more the actor: Or-bland-o Bloom. [/quote]
Fuck didnt know that he was in this, please say its just a bit part.[/quote]
Yep. Heâs in:
http://collider.com/orlando-bloom-the-hobbit-interview/118777/
Jesus Christ how many times are they going to reboot the Three Musketeers?
I have yet to ever see one that was nothing more than B movie shit.
Iâm actually thinking I wonât even see the first Hobbit movie.
Iâve read the books all twice, have the Lord of the Rings trilogy in leatherbound hardcover ready for me to read again soonâŠbut the movies sometimes feel like Easter mass. So long and dull and I canât wait for it to end.
[quote]Nards wrote:
Iâm actually thinking I wonât even see the first Hobbit movie.
Iâve read the books all twice, have the Lord of the Rings trilogy in leatherbound hardcover ready for me to read again soonâŠbut the movies sometimes feel like Easter mass. So long and dull and I canât wait for it to end.[/quote]
Thatâs the sort of reasoning I have for wanting something shorter and less taxing - a lighter alternative to the trilogy when you just donât feel like a marathon . Tolkien created The Hobbit as a bedtime story for his kids. That should set the tone and the length. The running time shouldnât be what makes you fall asleep. It isnât a doorstop book but theyâre adapting it like it is.
âŠand if Tolkien wanted Legolas in The Hobbit, heâd have written him into the book.
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
Iâm actually thinking I wonât even see the first Hobbit movie.
Iâve read the books all twice, have the Lord of the Rings trilogy in leatherbound hardcover ready for me to read again soonâŠbut the movies sometimes feel like Easter mass. So long and dull and I canât wait for it to end.[/quote]
Thatâs the sort of reasoning I have for wanting something shorter and less taxing - a lighter alternative to the trilogy when you just donât feel like a marathon . Tolkien created The Hobbit as a bedtime story for his kids. That should set the tone and the length. The running time shouldnât be what makes you fall asleep. It isnât a doorstop book but theyâre adapting like it is.
âŠand if Tolkien wanted Legolas in The Hobbit, heâd have written him into the book.
[/quote]
He is in the book. And in the Fall of Gondolin but not the Silmarillion
[quote]Irish Daza wrote:
[quote]roybot wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
Iâm actually thinking I wonât even see the first Hobbit movie.
Iâve read the books all twice, have the Lord of the Rings trilogy in leatherbound hardcover ready for me to read again soonâŠbut the movies sometimes feel like Easter mass. So long and dull and I canât wait for it to end.[/quote]
Thatâs the sort of reasoning I have for wanting something shorter and less taxing - a lighter alternative to the trilogy when you just donât feel like a marathon . Tolkien created The Hobbit as a bedtime story for his kids. That should set the tone and the length. The running time shouldnât be what makes you fall asleep. It isnât a doorstop book but theyâre adapting like it is.
âŠand if Tolkien wanted Legolas in The Hobbit, heâd have written him into the book.
[/quote]
He is in the book.[/quote]
Really? I donât remember him, but then I havenât read The Hobbit since Return of the King was released.
It doesnât matter if heâs in it or not, these movies make me feel like a sucker.
Lord of the Rings Trilogy: Between 1137 and 1347 pages, depending on the edition⊠3 very good movies (that some people still thought dragged on at times [although those were probably people who hadnât read the books]).
The Hobbit: 297-320 pages⊠significantly shorter than any one of the LOTR books⊠3 movies.
Looper animated trailer:
[quote]Gmoore17 wrote:
Lord of the Rings Trilogy: Between 1137 and 1347 pages, depending on the edition⊠3 very good movies (that some people still thought dragged on at times [although those were probably people who hadnât read the books]).
The Hobbit: 297-320 pages⊠significantly shorter than any one of the LOTR books⊠3 movies.[/quote]
Hollywood has to make that dollar bill!
Iâm rereading The Hobbit and the part where they meet the trolls is, in my edition, on page 33âŠhow much you wanna bet the first movie concludes, at the 2 hour 40 minute mark, with this scene?
[quote]Nards wrote:
Iâm rereading The Hobbit and the part where they meet the trolls is, in my edition, on page 33âŠhow much you wanna bet the first movie concludes, at the 2 hour 40 minute mark, with this scene?[/quote]
I will not take that bet, cause that is my guess as well. The first movie will be back story and build up, with the meeting at the trolls the end. Next will be Rivendale/Gollum and Last will be Smog