NBA Free Agency/Offseason

[quote]randman wrote:

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:
The difference is only because of their personalities and the way they handled it. Garnett carried himself with class and thanked the fans and obviously agonized over leaving his team. Lebron… not so much.
[/quote]

No, that’s not the only difference. You’re missing the BIGGEST difference. Charles Barkley has said this as well. Look it up on youtube.com. Garnett, Karl Malone, Gary Payton, Ray Allen all went to teams LATER in their careers (on the downside of their careers) to come together and try to win a championship. T

hey didn’t puss out and go to another team when they were in their primes. Alpha Males, Guys who want to be considered as part of greatest players of all time, don’t pull this shit. Only LeQueen does…[/quote]

LOL damn man, why are you so angry?

Jabbar demanded a trade from the Bucks. Granted, he had already won a championship, but he had Oscar Robertson on his team. He is certainly in the conversation among best ever.

Robertson actually is a good comparison for Lebron. Didn’t win a championship until his 30s (and got traded to a team with a young Kareem); brilliant all-around play but criticized for not elevating his teammates. Certainly among the best ever.

How bout Chamberlain? Played for 3 different teams. Some (not me) argue he’s the greatest of all time.

Shaq is another comparison for Lebron. Left in free agency in his prime. Considered one of the greatest players of all time.

The difference is that, every other team (with the exception of Robertson’s Royals) who had a top-20 all-time talent (as Lebron certainly is) managed to put quality supporting casts around their star. The Cavs never did.

It’s not about being selfish, or being an asshole. Kobe’s gonna go down as the best player of his generation, and he’s definitely an asshole. He wasn’t serious about the Clippers, but best believe he was serious about the Bulls. He’s said in recent interviews that he wasn’t serious about the Clips but he was with the Bulls.

It’s about being a pussy. Kobe in LeBron’s position might have gone to Chicago. But not this team. He wants to be the best player ever. Winning is a big part of it, but not the whole thing. [Robert Horry is probably the winningest player of Michael Jordan’s generation–he’s also not even a Top 100 player in history]. You have to be better than the other players in the league and the undisputed #1 guy on your team.

[quote]randman wrote:

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:
It’s the people who say, “he should have went to the Knicks/Bull/Nets” or whatever who are retarded. Wtf does he owe the Knicks?

[/quote]

He doesn’t owe the Knicks anything. But if he did go to either Knicks/Bulls/Nets, people would still criticize him for leaving but we wouldn’t all be saying he couldn’t win is the Alpha Male on a team so had to go to Wade’s team to try and win anything. Biggest beta male move ever in NBA history. Total wuss…

What the hell are you talking about? Wade was never a sidekick role on Miami. Are you kidding me? He had one of the most dominating Finals performances in NBA history. He almost single-handedly won that series against Dallas. Shaq was the sidekick. WTF?!?
[/quote]

Magic wasn’t the “Alpha Male” in the beginning of his Lakers career, Kareem was. Didn’t stop him from taking that title eventually and going down as one of the greatest in NBA history. Even your beloved Kobe took a while to become the “Alpha” and really, last year was the first title he won as “the Alpha.”

Besides, by game 40 it will be apparent that Lebron is the Alpha Male of that team, so this argument will be moot.

[quote]randman wrote:

[quote]LarryDavid wrote:
and to develop some more on the mental side of things. [/quote]

Agree with most of what you say. However, you casually mentioned the BIGGEST factor/problem with Lebron James that we who have been his most vocal critics have said all along.

He lacks the killer instinct. Plain and simple. You don’t just develop this mentality. You either have it or you don’t. Jordan/Kobe = having it. Lebron = doesn’t hav it/never will.

His decision to join Miami confirms this.[/quote]

Yeah, he doesn’t have a killer instinct and you’ve gotta be born with that I think.

But I think the ability to not fall apart in the playoffs against a team like Boston is one a good coach and some experience could really help with. MJ was a better player for suffering through the Celts and Pistons. I wish LeBron had TRIED that route as well.

NEWS: Wesley Matthews signs 5yr/$34M with POR, Jazz have 7 days to match.

If UTA doesn’t match, I hope the Jazz can bring back Ronnie Brewer, he was a good fit for the team and he is one of D-Will’s best friends.

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:
LOL damn man, why are you so angry? [/quote]

Me? Angry? Not at all.

He won a championship on his own!!! And Oscar Robertson was not an Alpha Male, batman, etc. He was no Dwayne Wade. Highly talented, highly skilled but Oscar was not an Alpha Dog leading his team to a championship with a supporting cast like Wade did. How can you not see the differences?

Not among best ever. He did not win as an Alpha Dog on any championship team. Kareem was Alpha Dog. If Lebron is lucky he may flirt with top ten if he wins multiple championships but the criticism of him you’re not understanding is that everyone was crowning this guy as the potential to be one of the best ever.

No freaking way now. He’s not even in the conversation with Magic, Bird, Jordan, Kareem, Russell; yes and Kobe is fast approaching that group. Lebron willing gave up the ability to win a championship on any team as the Alpha Dog. He was a beta male and always will be a beta male regardless of if he wins championships now which isn’t guaranteed.

Not the greatest of all time. Wilt Chamberlain does NOT rank above Bird, Johnson, Jabar, Russell and Jordan. That’s exactly the type of comparison that makes my point even more. Lebron a lot like Chamberlain. Oodles of talent, physical freaks, no killer instinct. Even he had one championship as an Alpha Dog. LeLoser will have none.

You want to criticize Kobe with Shaq? Fine, then put the same criteria on LeLoser. And Kobe/Shaq didn’t choose each other because they couldn’t win on their own. It just worked out that they both were serious Alpha Dogs when Shaq came over from Orlando and Kobe was traded to the Lakers.

Doesn’t even crack top 10 players. What fucking list are you picking from?!?

[quote]
The difference is that, every other team (with the exception of Robertson’s Royals) who had a top-20 all-time talent (as Lebron certainly is) managed to put quality supporting casts around their star. The Cavs never did.[/quote]

And this is your defense of Lebron’s sorry ass going to Miami where Wade is the Alpha Dog??? Again, if Jordan or Kobe were in Lebron’s position and really that unhappy with Cleveland, Jordan/Kobe would have chosen Chicago, NY, NJ, etc where they would be the Alpha Dog. Not Lebron, he’s a pussy and he knows he can’t win as the Alpha dog for his team so went running to Wade.

Enough with your sorry ass defense of this punk.

[quote]LarryDavid wrote:

[quote]randman wrote:

[quote]LarryDavid wrote:
and to develop some more on the mental side of things. [/quote]

Agree with most of what you say. However, you casually mentioned the BIGGEST factor/problem with Lebron James that we who have been his most vocal critics have said all along.

He lacks the killer instinct. Plain and simple. You don’t just develop this mentality. You either have it or you don’t. Jordan/Kobe = having it. Lebron = doesn’t hav it/never will.

His decision to join Miami confirms this.[/quote]

Yeah, he doesn’t have a killer instinct and you’ve gotta be born with that I think.

But I think the ability to not fall apart in the playoffs against a team like Boston is one a good coach and some experience could really help with. MJ was a better player for suffering through the Celts and Pistons. I wish LeBron had TRIED that route as well.[/quote]

But he didn’t because he showed his true colors. No chance of GOAT, no Alpha Male status, just a poseur who wanted to hang out with his friends in South Beach and have fun.

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:
Magic wasn’t the “Alpha Male” in the beginning of his Lakers career, Kareem was. Didn’t stop him from taking that title eventually and going down as one of the greatest in NBA history. Even your beloved Kobe took a while to become the “Alpha” and really, last year was the first title he won as “the Alpha.”

Besides, by game 40 it will be apparent that Lebron is the Alpha Male of that team, so this argument will be moot.[/quote]

Seriously, trying to explain things to you is starting to get “tiring”. I know you’re not this stupid.

Magic didn’t fail in the league for 7 years in his prime, couldn’t win a championship on his own so he chose another team with an Alpha Dog already on it. Yes, in the beginning it was Kareem and soon became Magic with Kareem as good Robin.

Shaq and Kobe were both Alpha Males. I’m not going to keep repeating myself where in the 01 and 02 season he was actually producing the better PER in the playoffs than Shaq. Kobe was never a Robin to Shaq’s Batman. They were both Batman’s with the exception of the first year for Kobe he was a Robin.

And again, Kobe or Shaq didn’t dwadle in the league for 7 years, couldn’t win a title on their own as Alpha Dog, and go running to one another when they couldn’t do it as an Alpha Dog.

This is what Lebron just did. NO OTHER TOP TEN PLAYER OF ALL TIME has done this. Lebron’s legacy is permanently tarnished with this beta male decision. Plain and simple.

[quote]LarryDavid wrote:
I don’t have a problem with LeBron taking less money to have a chance at winning multiple titles. That’s fine by me. I also don’t have a problem with him trying to change the way the League is with this. I don’t have a problem with him wanting to play with his buddies.

I have a problem with his refusal to compete against the two guys he is teaming up with. It’s like he gave up on wanting to be GOAT. I can’t believe he doesn’t want to see who ends up the better player down the line: him Wade, Bosh, Kobe, Durant, etc.

As far as raw ability goes, this guy is head and shoulders above everybody in the league. Easily. That includes Kobe, Wade, Garnett in his prime, whoever. There just isn’t a player with his combination of speed, size, agility, coordination. Some are better at one of those, but no one has the whole package like James.

He’s a guy who is capable of leading a shitty team to a 60 win record in the regular season. And he’s the consensus pick for most exciting player in the league. No one close there either. He really just needed better coaching, and to develop some more on the mental side of things.

And maybe a better jump shot if he wanted to be a complete player. He had a good coach hired in Cleveland, with Byron Scott, and the other two take time and effort.

I don’t know if he’d ever be as great as Mike, but he could have easily finished his career in the position to be mentioned in the same breath. Just on pure ability to play ball, he and Kobe are probably already better than Michael.

He just needed to win as an undisputed leader. To everybody who isn’t a hardcore Kobe fan, the fact that his first three rings came with Shaq kind of disqualifies him from being as good as MJ. LeBron just voluntarily put that hex on himself.

THAT is my issue with LeBron’s choice.[/quote]

Yeah those are close to my sentiments about the entire ‘decision.’ I still cant fathom LeBron James being in Miami taking in a equal or secondary role in a basketball team. He was the supposedly ‘chosen one’ who’d lead a team(s) to glory.

These last 7 years he’s basically carried that team on his back (which to add is a average-mediocre team), leading them to several years with the best record in the league and 1 Finals appearance. Its easy to think ‘what a waste’ now that he’s going to be joining what would have been competition.

However the feelings I have are of disappointment and mellowed sadness. His decision is ultimately his own and its consequences on his image and legacy are borne only by him. With that in mind I’m not angry and bitter and I’m not going to hate on him even though I think the NBA is going to be worse.

I disagree with you Larry about MJ though. Apparently in his prime Jordan was much more athletic than Kobe in his prime. LeBron is a freak and I think he’s more athletic than any basketballer ever. In technical ability Kobe maybe better than MJ but MJ was more technical than LeBron I believe. MJ kind of gets the best of both worlds.

[quote]LarryDavid wrote:
It’s not about being selfish, or being an asshole. Kobe’s gonna go down as the best player of his generation, and he’s definitely an asshole. He wasn’t serious about the Clippers, but best believe he was serious about the Bulls. He’s said in recent interviews that he wasn’t serious about the Clips but he was with the Bulls.

It’s about being a pussy. Kobe in LeBron’s position might have gone to Chicago. But not this team. He wants to be the best player ever. Winning is a big part of it, but not the whole thing. [Robert Horry is probably the winningest player of Michael Jordan’s generation–he’s also not even a Top 100 player in history]. You have to be better than the other players in the league and the undisputed #1 guy on your team.[/quote]

Thank you. Jtrinsey and Drewdines are just too dense to get this.

[quote]LarryDavid wrote:
It’s about being a pussy… Winning is a big part of it, but not the whole thing… You have to be better than the other players in the league and the undisputed #1 guy on your team.[/quote]

Wait… didn’t Lebron just win two MVPs? He’s better than Wade. I love how everybody has completely forgotten about this so quickly. This argument is absolutely ludicrous because Lebron has already proved he’s better than Kobe/Wade/anybody else at carrying a team by himself.

What he hasn’t proved is that he has the ability to win championships with a supporting cast that is good enough where he can be expected to win a championship. So why not go to a team with a supporting cast that is good enough to win.

I don’t get how this is being a pussy. There’s more pressure on him in Miami than anywhere else. Anywhere else, it could have been, “supporting cast wasn’t good enough,” again.

Now, if they don’t win the championship, his legacy will pretty much be tarnished forever and people will always say, “yeah he was great as a one-man show, but he can’t win the big one.” There’s more pressure on him than any NBA player in recent memory. How is that a pussy move?

[quote]therajraj wrote:
I find it hard to believe Bosh/James/Wade were conspiring when they signed extensions with their previous teams. They wanted to sign big contracts just before the new CBA kicks in.[/quote]

you sir are uninformed. they all signed limited 5 year deals with the express chance of maybe playing with each other. however, as we know now, it was not “maybe”.

[quote]randman wrote:

Doesn’t even crack top 10 players. What fucking list are you picking from?!?

[/quote]

Out of context but in those early years with the Lakers and the championship era Shaq was about as dominant as any player in NBA history. Honestly he was insane…

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
All of them, KG, Allen and Pierce, toiled with their respective teams in an effort to win. If you see it any other way, you’re just obtuse.[/quote]

LOL, you say this like Lebron wasn’t “toiling” for Cleveland the past 7 years. Was he sipping pina coladas and playing Harlem Globtrotters exhibitions while refusing to don a Cavs jersey?

From a basketball perspective, what James did was almost identical to what Garnett did. He sacrificed being “the man” on a weaker team in order to have a better chance at winning a title. Garnett was universally praised for his decision, Lebron is universally criticized.

The difference is only because of their personalities and the way they handled it. Garnett carried himself with class and thanked the fans and obviously agonized over leaving his team. Lebron… not so much.
[/quote]

Not even a close comparison. Minnesota did very little to give him the teammates to win it all. GARNETT DID NOT CONSPIRE WITH TWO OTHER SUPERSTARS TO CHERRY PICK ANOTHER TEAM. GARNETT WAS ON THE DOWNSIDE OF HIS CAREER, LOOKING TO GET A RING. LEBRON IS WELL WITHIN HIS PRIME, LOOKING TO CHERRY PICK A RING.

[quote]Gettnitdone wrote:

[quote]randman wrote:

Doesn’t even crack top 10 players. What fucking list are you picking from?!?

[/quote]

Out of context but in those early years with the Lakers and the championship era Shaq was about as dominant as any player in NBA history. Honestly he was insane…[/quote]

Dude, he was in my opinion one of the most physical freaks I’ve ever laid eyes on. My God. I’m with you. I’m just reminiscing now when I didn’t hate Shaq. :slight_smile:

[quote]jtrinsey wrote:
Wait… didn’t Lebron just win two MVPs?
[/quote]

Regular season MVPs??? This is your defense of Lebron? Yes, because greatest of all time players are defined by their regular seasons. You must be kidding…again.

You’re mixing up talent with being “the man” on your own team. Wade is “the man” on the Heat. Lebron will never take over that role. ARod is more talented than Jeter. Jeter is “the man” on the Yankees and ARod will never be.

No championships in 7 years. Being the pussy that he is, he walked to go to hide under the shadow of Wade instead of cutting a path with Chicago as being “the man”. He couldn’t do it because he mentally has no killer instinct. Kobe or Wade or Jordan would never go running to Lebron. NEVER.

He wasn’t good enough to win a championship as the Alpha Dog and quit trying and decided to “become” part of the supporting cast to Wade’s team. Stop trying to manipulate reality. This is and always WILL BE Wade’s team. Lebron is part of the supporting cast now. You got it backwards.

[quote]
I don’t get how this is being a pussy. There’s more pressure on him in Miami than anywhere else. Anywhere else, it could have been, “supporting cast wasn’t good enough,” again.

Now, if they don’t win the championship, his legacy will pretty much be tarnished forever and people will always say, “yeah he was great as a one-man show, but he can’t win the big one.” There’s more pressure on him than any NBA player in recent memory. How is that a pussy move?[/quote]

Even if he wins, he’s still a pussy. He doesn’t have to be great every night anymore. Kobe and Jordan almost always have to be great every night. Lebron can hide behind Wade and doesn’t have to be “the man” every night. He’s a pussy. Plain and simple. Stop defending pussy behavior.

[quote]randman wrote:

[quote]LarryDavid wrote:
It’s not about being selfish, or being an asshole. Kobe’s gonna go down as the best player of his generation, and he’s definitely an asshole. He wasn’t serious about the Clippers, but best believe he was serious about the Bulls. He’s said in recent interviews that he wasn’t serious about the Clips but he was with the Bulls.

It’s about being a pussy. Kobe in LeBron’s position might have gone to Chicago. But not this team. He wants to be the best player ever. Winning is a big part of it, but not the whole thing. [Robert Horry is probably the winningest player of Michael Jordan’s generation–he’s also not even a Top 100 player in history]. You have to be better than the other players in the league and the undisputed #1 guy on your team.[/quote]

Thank you. Jtrinsey and Drewdines are just too dense to get this.[/quote]

Well I don’t get it either. I think winning should always be the top priority.

It’s a little different if you want to represent your hometown. But otherwise, it’s a team sport, and you guys are basically saying athletes should have a “me first” attitude [trying to prove how great they are]. Sorry but I don’t get it.

[quote]randman wrote:
Shaq and Kobe were both Alpha Males. [/quote]

Kobe’s average record without Shaq or Pau Gasol: 40-42
Lebron’s average record without Shaq or Pau Gasol: 50-32

OHMYGODKOBEISSOFUCKINGALPHA!!!

Before, we go further into a discourse in which we will inevitably misconstrue the other’s opinions and/or strawman the shit out of each other, I want to make it clear that I REALLY DO UNDERSTAND that argument that you are making. I read the entire Bill Simmons book and all 800000 footnotes, and look, I agree with you for the most part.

Remember that Andrew Bynum/Tony Parker shitfest, and the argument about being the 2nd-best player on a championship team and all that nonsense? I agree totally that players should be largely judged on how much they contribute to championship teams. That is why I will totally agree that, as of this moment, Kobe is “greater” than Lebron. Hands down.

Agreements aside, here is where you are a borderline down-syndrome case:

(1) Not including Oscar Roberton and Shaq among the “best players ever.” Please. Through 2009, Shaq was better than Kobe. Same amount of championships, was more dominant at his peak, etc. Kobe has passed him now, and the distance will certainly grow. But to not put Shaq and Oscar among the top 10 or 15 all-time is insane.

(2) Your comments that seem to imply Dwayne Wade as better than Oscar Robertson. Please, explain that before everybody on here loses all respect for your basketball knowledge.

(3) The assertion that Lebron has no chance to win a championship as an Alpha Dog. So… Kobe can be a “co-Alpha” with Shaq, but Lebron is demoted to beta status? Please. Lebron is better than Dwayne Wade or at least on the level where they are “co-Alphas” or “mutal Batmen” or whatever term you want to use.

Of course, maybe Lebron just isn’t built that way and he will reveal himself as a second-banana and then everything will easily be settled. But, to act like he has no chance to assert himself as unquestionably the go-to guy on the Heat, reel off 5 championships and lay claim to GOAT status… it’s possible. Unlikely, and I don’t think it will happen. But, it’s certainly possible.

(4) You keep saying that Lebron is a coward for running and everybody else is so tough and manly for sticking with these teams. “Nobody has done it before.” Let’s break down everybody else remotely in the conversation for GOAT and see who they had around them by year 6:

Jordan: Pippen, Grant, Jackson
Kareem: Oscar Robertson and 4-time all-star Bob Dandridge
Magic: Kareem, Cooper, Worthy, etc.
Bird: Parish, McHale, Maxwell, Archibald,
Russell: Like half the hall of fame + Red Auerbach
Kobe: Shaq + Phil Jackson
Hakeem: Ralph Sampson + Sleepy Floyd
Duncan: Dave Robinson + Popovich
Shaq: Penny early, then Kobe
Oscar: The only other player who never really got the strong supporting cast.
Wilt: Paul Arizin
West: Elgin Baylor

Who else do you want to put up there? (Side note: you’re really going to poo-poo Shaq and Big O as among the GOATs like it’s preposterous to put them in the top-10? I can see 11 and 12. But who else are you really putting in front of them besides those 10?)

No other top player has ever left the team he was drafted with in order to win a championship, because every other great player had championship pieces already around him by year 6, and in most cases, had already played with another Hall of Famer by year 6. So, it’s kind of ridiculous to say what these guys would or wouldn’t do, because nobody really knows.

As a final note: can we all agree to stop using “Alpha,” “Beta,” “Batman,” “Robin,” etc., it’s getting a little weird and creepy.

Nvm.

[quote]randman wrote:
Kobe and Jordan almost always have to be great every night.
[/quote]

Really? You’re still going to make that argument after Game 7? Kobe couldn’t even get his team to the playoffs without Jackson and Gasol. Jordan couldn’t beat the Pistons without Pippen and Jackson.

No great player has ever done it alone. The closest anybody has come was probably Hakeem in 94. Kobe and Jordan both played with Hall of Famers and the best coach ever. So don’t act like they were never picked up by their teammates.