The funny thing is I agree with almost everything you just said… I’m done X, I said what I had to say and I’m bowing out. The stage is all yours again. Looking lean in that avatar!
Same trending topics on forums since invention of internet:
“Is XYZZ Natural?”
" How to make my ‘inner’ chest grow"
“Are cupcakes good PW?”
“Does my arms measure 18 inches?”
“Is Ahnold natural?”
“Write me a workout plan NOW!”
“How do I get a six pack?”
“How to perform a smith-machine curls.”
“Wraps R4 PUZZIES!?!¿”
“Every time I squat, My L6 disc falls off my back, Should I stop squatting?”
“How do I look like Zack Khan?”
Side note on the pictures, kinda got mentioned on page 1. These are professional pictures. Picture 1 makes the dude look unreal, picture 3 is a lot more ‘attainable’ looking. I’ve got some good friends in pro photography, and my wife does a lot with photography as well. Before I saw what my wife does with pictures once they’re on her computer, I had no idea how much goes into making photos look good (lighting techniques during a shoot AND lighting touchup on the computer, enhancing shadows, etc.)
I’m actually considering putting up some cell phone pics of myself alongside some professionally done photos so some of you guys can see how much good photography can enhance someone’s looks. I’m not even talking about photoshop bullshit, I’m talking about standard touchup stuff that’s used in every muscle mag out there.
[quote]SavagedNatiion wrote:
Same trending topics on forums since invention of internet:
“Is XYZZ Natural?”
" How to make my ‘inner’ chest grow"
“Are cupcakes good PW?”
“Does my arms measure 18 inches?”
“Is Ahnold natural?”
“Write me a workout plan NOW!”
“How do I get a six pack?”
“How to perform a smith-machine curls.”
“Wraps R4 PUZZIES!?!¿”
“Every time I squat, My L6 disc falls off my back, Should I stop squatting?”
“How do I look like Zack Khan?”[/quote]
This should be stickied
I’m no psychologist but this johnman guy might be schitzo.
Whether or not the first guy is natty, I believe he has a physique that is acheivable as a natty. Not all natty’s though.
[quote]johnman18 wrote:
I’m done X, I said what I had to say and I’m bowing out. The stage is all yours again. [/quote]
welcome to X-Nation…
[quote]flipcollar wrote:
Side note on the pictures, kinda got mentioned on page 1. These are professional pictures. Picture 1 makes the dude look unreal, picture 3 is a lot more ‘attainable’ looking. I’ve got some good friends in pro photography, and my wife does a lot with photography as well. Before I saw what my wife does with pictures once they’re on her computer, I had no idea how much goes into making photos look good (lighting techniques during a shoot AND lighting touchup on the computer, enhancing shadows, etc.)
I’m actually considering putting up some cell phone pics of myself alongside some professionally done photos so some of you guys can see how much good photography can enhance someone’s looks. I’m not even talking about photoshop bullshit, I’m talking about standard touchup stuff that’s used in every muscle mag out there.[/quote]
Please do.
[quote]ishinator wrote:
[quote]flipcollar wrote:
Side note on the pictures, kinda got mentioned on page 1. These are professional pictures. Picture 1 makes the dude look unreal, picture 3 is a lot more ‘attainable’ looking. I’ve got some good friends in pro photography, and my wife does a lot with photography as well. Before I saw what my wife does with pictures once they’re on her computer, I had no idea how much goes into making photos look good (lighting techniques during a shoot AND lighting touchup on the computer, enhancing shadows, etc.)
I’m actually considering putting up some cell phone pics of myself alongside some professionally done photos so some of you guys can see how much good photography can enhance someone’s looks. I’m not even talking about photoshop bullshit, I’m talking about standard touchup stuff that’s used in every muscle mag out there.[/quote]
Please do.
[/quote]
I’ll post in my RMP thread, and maybe CC’s new February call-out thread.
[quote]ishinator wrote:
[quote]flipcollar wrote:
Side note on the pictures, kinda got mentioned on page 1. These are professional pictures. Picture 1 makes the dude look unreal, picture 3 is a lot more ‘attainable’ looking. I’ve got some good friends in pro photography, and my wife does a lot with photography as well. Before I saw what my wife does with pictures once they’re on her computer, I had no idea how much goes into making photos look good (lighting techniques during a shoot AND lighting touchup on the computer, enhancing shadows, etc.)
I’m actually considering putting up some cell phone pics of myself alongside some professionally done photos so some of you guys can see how much good photography can enhance someone’s looks. I’m not even talking about photoshop bullshit, I’m talking about standard touchup stuff that’s used in every muscle mag out there.[/quote]
Please do.
[/quote]
x2 - I think that would be really interesting.
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
I’m no psychologist but this johnman guy might be schitzo.
Whether or not the first guy is natty, I believe he has a physique that is acheivable as a natty. Not all natty’s though. [/quote]
LOL well maybe you’re better than most psychologists I’ve seen then. I’m sure I am schizo or bipolar but any psychologist I’ve seen just say that I am an asshole…not that they’re wrong but I think there is more to it
lol Looking sick btw Maiden, nice to see you’re still posting here too.
[quote]Vagina Whisperer wrote:
[quote]johnman18 wrote:
I’m done X, I said what I had to say and I’m bowing out. The stage is all yours again. [/quote]
welcome to X-Nation…[/quote]
LMFAO!!!
like someone said the pictures can be edited and enhanced to highlight a physique. He could possibly be natural but it is always suspect when someone has size plus leaness. much less obvious than that panda dude anyway
^ I agree and like I said I’ve seen him in real life, I’ve lifted with him, he use to be a “friend”. And he looks absolutely retarded huge. I’m sure he’s not on the same cycles, he probably tones it down…just speculation of course. And yeah way less obvious then Panda. I’m not trying to drag him into this but look at Zraw he openly admits to his use. And this guy is pretty damn close to him…
In the days of yore, we might have been playing “Guess Her Muff” instead of this crap.
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
In the days of yore, we might have been playing “Guess Her Muff” instead of this crap.[/quote]
Ain’t that the truth! I’d rather play that game but I just figured this was the best game we could play on here now lol.
[quote]johnman18 wrote:
[quote]SteelyD wrote:
In the days of yore, we might have been playing “Guess Her Muff” instead of this crap.[/quote]
Ain’t that the truth! I’d rather play that game but I just figured this was the best game we could play on here now lol.[/quote]
Better yet, Meat or Pussy.
he looks awsome in that first picture .
[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Honestly white guys cant be that big and lean naturally…he is definitely on teh juice![/quote]
what if they play basketball?
[quote]Airtruth wrote:
[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Honestly white guys cant be that big and lean naturally…he is definitely on teh juice![/quote]
what if they play basketball?
[/quote]
And eat mc Donald’s?
[quote]gregron wrote:
[quote]Airtruth wrote:
[quote]MattyXL wrote:
Honestly white guys cant be that big and lean naturally…he is definitely on teh juice![/quote]
what if they play basketball?
[/quote]
And eat mc Donald’s?[/quote]
But none of the burgers or chicken salads, protein is for dudes with shitty genetics.
