[quote]kilpaba wrote:
It should be pointed out, in fairness to both sides, that a non-zero possibility exists for both lots of life elsewhere and no life anywhere else. The question is which has the LARGER possibility of occurring given the data that we have currently. Current science and statistics would indicate there is a greater chance of other life than no other life. It is more reasonable given the evidence to assume something PROBABLY exists out there than to say that it is UNLIKELY anything else is out there. [/quote]
I do not argue this point. My opinion (and the opinion of most experts in the field) is that the number of stars is effectively infinite – it may actually BE infinite, for we have not proved there is an end to the universe, and it does not get any less dense the further out we look-- which makes ANY possible outcome, no matter how improbable, into a certainty.
But you’re technically right… if the number of stars is finite, no matter how large it is, it’s technically possible something could only exist once. Something like that would have to be a number so infinitesimally small that we can’t grasp how small the chance is-- much like the universe is so large we can’t grasp how BIG it is.
If I can prance around saying “THE UNIVERSE IS SO BIG YOU CANT GRASP IT” then I suppose I should accept that the formation of life is so improbable that I can’t grasp how improbable it is. It’s only fair.

