My Problem with Wikileaks

Agreed

Have a good one

???

I’m definitely missing the point on this one…

1 Like

A picture says a thousand words

2 Likes

Who wouldn’t stare at Christina? Shit I’d take a slap with a smile.

2 Likes

Okay…

Now Clinton is a child and chicken sacrificing LESBIAN Succubus, who is the very spawn of Satan himself…

Anything else?

She’s also Trump’s distant cousin, both descended from British royalty:

She had affairs with men and women, including Yoko Ono. Here’s one about an affair with a man:

As for Bill, are you not aware of his escapades with Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, and others? How come him and Hillary get a free pass but everyone is going after Trump?

1 Like

Are you kidding me, @chris_ottawa?

Free pass? The CLINTON’S???

PLEASE tell me you are kidding by making that statement.

Where are you from and how old are you? You would have to be living under a rock in the Antarctic your whole Life to not have heard of Bill’s issues.

1 Like

Yeah, but the mainstream media still supports them. Compare that to all the anti-Trump nonsense. Trump is no good, perhaps the lesser of two evils but still evil, but the things they attack him for are minor nonsense compared to the actual bad shit he has done.

In any case, if Trump was for real he would have put the Clintons in jail already. We’re here discussing a case with a guy getting extradited to a country in which he never committed any crime and is not a citizen, look at how the Clinton Foundation robbed Haiti. If there was any justice, they would confiscate all the Clintons’ assets (proceeds of crime) and use them to help Haiti and put a few dollars towards their life sentence there. They deserve it.

I should just mention here, since a whole bunch of people think that it’s perfectly normal for a guy to be extradited under these circumstances, that even in the UK this is highly controversial. Theresa May is an evil piece of shit as you can already see, but there are other opposition politicians who are opposed to Assange’s arrest and impending extradition. This is not a cut and dry case at all.

1 Like

Okay…I see where you are coming from.

Thanks for your honesty.

America is never wrong because we make the rules. And also if we do something bad most of us will just say ā€œlove it or leave it!ā€ anyways.

Suck on our freedom everyone.

2 Likes

I approve this message.

2 Likes

@H_factor 2020! That’s way better than MAGA or Forward.

2 Likes

WikiLeaks was concerned about a drone strike? WikiLeaks probably made up the story about a potential drone strike since they were the source for the story in the first place.

Now, @zecarlo…

You mean ā€œtheā€ WikiLeaks…the gold standard of Journalistic Integrity and Freedom?

Impossible.

All you need to do is qualify it with ā€œan unnamed source.ā€

WikiLeaks did publish a book in which they describe in detail why they hate America. I don’t get why anyone would speculate about it one way or another when they have clearly stated their position. It should not even be debatable.

@zecarlo…

Makes sense in the asymmetric way in which they publish(ed?) information about the U.S. and not other World Players.

However; the 2016 election is somewhat of a ā€œhead-scratcherā€? (Maybe?) in WikiLeak’s asymmetric release of information?

I do know this; I have seen one of the worst cases of ā€œWhat-about-ismā€ on this thread in defending Wikileaks using the Clinton’s as some kind of justification for what was done.

(…and for the record…I do not, and have not, been a supporter of the Clinton’s and never will be. There is just WAY too much ā€œsmokeā€ that surrounds those two for none if it to be true…)

Heard an interesting take that was food for thought. Nothing Wikileaks has published has turned out to be fake. So far they’re batting 1000.

All of the ā€œnormalā€ media outlets on every side make mistakes every day trying to be first with a story. Wikileaks just publishes the source material without editorializtion.

So whether they are puppets of a foreign power or make corrupt editorial decisions on what to publish: They’re vetting the material.

One small bit of faint praise.

WikiLeaks has really never leaked anything that wasn’t already known.